The total cost and measured performance of utility-sponsored energy efficiency programs

Energy Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 31-51

  Eto, Joseph ^a   Vine, Edward ^a   Shown, Leslie ^a   Sonnenblick, Richard ^a   Payne, Chris ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EVALUATION; PERFORMANCE;

DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT; ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS; UTILITY SPONSORED ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS;

ENERGY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0029777653     PISSN: 01956574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol17-No1-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Atkinson, Barbara A., et al. (1992). Analysis of Federal Policy Options for Improving U.S. Lighting Energy Efficiency: Commercial and Residential Buildings. Berkeley California: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, December.
2. Berry, Linda (1991). "The Administrative Cost of Energy Conservation Programs," Energy Systems and Policy 15: 1-21.
3. Blumstein, Carl and Jeffrey Harris (1993). letter to Christine Gilbert, Letters Editor, Science 261: 970.
4. California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission (1987). Standard Practice Manual, Economic Analysis of Demand-Side Management Programs. Sacramento, California: California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission, December.
5. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (1993). Net-to-Gross Ratios for PG&E's CIA Rebate Program, Study B - Manufacturer, Vendor and Contractor Surveys. San Francisco, California: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, September.
6. Eto, Joseph, E. Vine, L. Shown, R. Sonnenblick, and C. Payne (1994). The Cost and Performance of Utility Commercial Lighting Programs, Berkeley, California: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, May.
7. Hirst, Eric and Joseph Eto (1995). Justification for Electric-Utility Energy-Efficiency Programs. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, August.
8. Hirst, Eric (1989). Comparison of Energy Information Agency Data Collections: Electricity Supply and Demand. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, October.
9. Joskow, Paul L. (1992) "Weighing Environmental Externalities: Let's Do it Right!" The Electricity Journal 5 (4): 53-67.
10. Joskow, Paul L. and Donald B. Marron (1992). "What Does a Negawatt Really Cost? Evidence from Utility Conservation Programs." The Energy Journal 13 (4): 41-74.
11. Kahn, Edward (1995). "Regulation by Simulation: The Role of Production Cost Models in Electricity Planning and Pricing." Operations Research 43 (3): 388-398.
12. Krause, Florentin and Joseph Eto (1988). Least-Cost Planning Handbook for Public Utility Commissioners: Volume 2 - The Demand Side: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Washington, DC: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, December.
13. Levine, Mark D. and Richard Sonnenblick (1995). "On the Assessment of Utility Demand-Side Management Programs." Energy Policy 22 (10): 848-856.
14. Nadel, Steven M. and Kenneth M. Keating (1991). "Engineering Estimates versus Impact Evaluation Results: How Do They Compare and Why?" in Energy Program Evaluation: Uses, Methods, and Results, Proceedings of the 1991 Energy Program Evaluation Conference.
15. Train, Kenneth E. (1994). "Estimation of Net Savings from Energy-Conservation Programs." Energy - The International Journal 19 (4): 423-441.
16. U.S. Energy Information Administration (1994). Annual Energy Outlook, Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration, December.
17. U.S. Energy Information Administration (1992). Energy Consumption Series: Lighting in Commercial Buildings, Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration, March.