Comparing empirical and analytical estimates of earthquake loss assessment studies for the city of Dehradun, India

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 595-619

  Lang, Dominik H ^a   Singh, Yogendra ^b   Prasad, J S R ^b  

^a NORSAR   (Norway)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOTION ESTIMATION;

ANALYTICAL ESTIMATES; BUILDING VULNERABILITIES; CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD; EARTHQUAKE RISK; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; GROUND MOTIONS; INDIAN SUBCONTINENTS; LOSS ESTIMATES;

EARTHQUAKES;

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; VULNERABILITY;

DEHRADUN; HIMALAYAS; INDIA; UTTARAKHAND;

EID: 84865003602     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.4000004     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ahorner, L., 1983. Seismicity and neotectonic structural activity of the Rhine Graben system in Central Europe, in Seismicity and Seismic Risk in the Offshore North Sea Area (A. R. Ritsema and A. Gürpinar, eds.), D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 101-111. (Pubitemid 16543245)
2. Ambraseys, N. N., Douglas, J., Sarma, S. K., and Smit, P. M., 2005. Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 3, 1-53. (Pubitemid 40550640)
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1985. Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, Report No. ATC-13, Redwood City, CA.
4. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Report No. ATC-40, Redwood City, CA.
5. Arya, A. S., 2003. Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings in Various Seismic Zones in India, Capacity Building Advisor, Technical Report, Government of India-United Nations Development Programme (GOI-UNDP) Disaster Risk Management (DRM) Programme, New Delhi, India.
6. Atkinson, G. M., and Wald, D. J., 2007. "Did you feel it?" Intensity data: A surprisingly good measure of earthquake ground motion, Seismological Research Letters 78, 362-368.
7. Bakun, W. H., and Wentworth, C. M., 1997. Estimating earthquake location and magnitude from seismic intensity data, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 87, 1502-1521.
8. Barbat, A. H., Moya, F. Y., and Canas, J. A., 1996. Damage scenarios simulation for seismic risk assessment in urban zones, Earthquake Spectra 12, 371-394. (Pubitemid 126596220)
9. Barbat, A. H., Pujades, L. G., and Lantada, N., 2008. Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: Application to Barcelona, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28, 851-865.
10. Boore, D. M., Joyner, W. B., and Fumal, T. E., 1997. Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work, Seismological Research Letters 68, 128-153.
11. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), 2002. Indian Standard -Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1 -General Provisions and Buildings, IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002, ICS 91.120.25, New Delhi, India.
12. Burt, J. E., and Barber, G. M., 1996. Elementary Statistics for Geographers, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
13. Campos Costa, A., Sousa, M. L., Carvalho, A., and Coelho, E., 2010. Evaluation of seismic risk and mitigation strategies for the existing building stock: Application of LNECloss to the metropolitan area of Lisbon, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8, 119-134.
14. Cattari, S., Curti, E., Giovinazzi, S., Lagomarsino, S., Parodi, S., and Penna, A., 2004. A mechanical model for the vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings in urban areas, in Proceedings, VI Congreso nazionale "L'ingegneria Sismica in Italia," Genova, Italy (in Italian).
15. Coburn, A., and Spence, R., 2002. Earthquake Protection, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England, 420 pp.
16. Edwards, M. R., Robinson, D., McAneney, K. J., and Schneider, J., 2004. Vulnerability of residential structures in Australia, Paper No. 2985, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1-6 August 2004, Vancouver, Canada.
17. Erdik, M., and Aydinoǧlu, N., 2002. Earthquake risk to buildings in Istanbul and a proposal towards its mitigation, in Proceedings, Second Annual IIASA-DPRI Meeting on Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity vulnerability and resilience, H. Pankl, ed., IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 1-10.
18. Erdik, M., Aydinoǧlu, N., Fahjan, Y., Sesetyan, K., Demircioǧlu, M., Siyahi, B., Durukal, E., Özbey, C., Biro, Y., Akman, H., and Yüzügüllü, O., 2003. Earthquake risk assessment for Istanbul metropolitan area, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2, 1-23.
19. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2003. HAZUS-MH MR4 Technical Manual.Washington, D.C., http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/hz-manuals.shtm, accessed 23 September 2010. accessed 23 September 2010
20. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2005. Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, FEMA 440, Washington, D.C.
21. Freeman, S. A., Nicoletti, J. P., and Tyrell, J. V., 1975. Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk: A case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington, in Proceedings of U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Berkeley, CA, 113-122.
22. Freeman, S. A., 1978. Prediction of Response of Concrete Buildings to Severe Earthquake Motion, Publication SP-55, pp. 589-605, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI.
23. Grünthal, G. (ed.), 1998. European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98), Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Vol. 15, Luxembourg.
24. International Code Council (ICC), 2006. 2006 International Building Code (IBC-2006), Washington, D.C.
25. Kappos, A. J, Stylianidis, K. C, and Pitilakis, K., 1998. Development of seismic risk scenarios based on a hybrid method of vulnerability assessment, Natural Hazards 17, 177-192. (Pubitemid 28556012)
26. Kappos, A. J., and Panagopoulos, G., 2010. Fragility curves for reinforced concrete buildings in Greece, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 6, 39-53.
27. Kappos, A. J., Panagopoulos, G., and Penelis, G. G., 2008. Development of a seismic damage and loss scenario for contemporary and historical buildings in Thessaloniki, Greece, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28, 836-850. (Pubitemid 351903466)
28. Krawinkler, H., and Seneviratna, G. D. P. K., 1998. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis for seismic performance evaluation, Engineering Structures 20, 452-464. (Pubitemid 128402872)
29. Lang, D. H., Molina, S., and Lindholm, C. D., 2008. Towards near-real-time damage estimation using a CSM-based tool for seismic risk assessment, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12, Supplement 2, 199-210.
30. Mahajan, A. K., Slob, S., Ranjan, R., Sporry, R., Champati Ray, P. K., and van Westen, C. J., 2007. Seismic microzonation of Dehradun City using geophysical and geotechnical characteristics in the upper 30 m of soil column, Journal of Seismology 11, 355-370. (Pubitemid 350131218)
31. Mahajan, A. K., and Rai, N., 2011. Using MASW to map depth to bedrock underneath Dehradun fan deposits in NW Himalaya, Current Science 100, 233-238.
32. McGuire, R. K., 2004. Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis, EERI Publication No. MNO-10. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
33. Molina, S., Lang, D. H., Lingvall, F., and Lindholm, C. D., 2009. User Manual for the Earthquake Loss Estimation Tool: SELENA, v5.0, http://selena.sourceforge.net/userman.shtml.
34. Molina, S., Lang, D. H., and Lindholm, C. D., 2010. SELENA -An open-source tool for seismic risk and loss assessment using a logic tree computation procedure, Computers & Geosciences 36, 257-269, DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.07.006.
35. Prasad, J. S. R., 2010. Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Indian Urban Housing, Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR).
36. Prasad, J. S. R., Singh, Y., Kaynia, A. M., and Lindholm, C. D., 2009. Socioeconomic clustering in seismic risk assessment of Indian urban housing stock, Earthquake Spectra 25, 619-641.
37. Roca, A., Goula, X., Susagna, T., Chávez, J., González, M., and Reinoso, E., 2006. A simplified method for vulnerability assessment of dwelling buildings and estimation of damage scenarios in Catalonia, Spain, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4, 141-158.
38. Seismic Loss Estimation Using a Logic Tree Approach (SELENA), 2011. SELENA-RISe Open Risk Package Web page, http://selena.sourceforge.net/.
39. Sharma, M. L., and Lindholm, C. D., 2007. Seismic Hazard Analysis and Zonation for Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, Tech. Rep.1, http://www.eqrisk.info/ downloads/Tech-Report-1-New-Hazard-Report.pdf, accessed 12 September 2010.
40. Sharma, M. L., and Lindholm, C. D., 2011. Earthquake hazard assessment for Dehradun including characteristic earthquake model for HFF, Pure and Applied Geophysics, DOI 10.1007/s00024-011-0427-7.
41. Sharma, M. L., Douglas, J., Bungum, H., and Kotadia, J., 2009. Ground-motion prediction equations based on data from the Himalayan and Zagros regions, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 13, 1191-1210, DOI: 10.1080/13632460902859151.
42. So, E. K. M., and Spence, R., 2006. Factors determining human casualties in earthquakes: A revised loss modeling approach, in Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA, Paper no. 445.
43. Spence, R. J. S., Coburn, A. W., Sakai, S., and Pomonis, A., 1991. A parameterless scale of seismic intensity for use in seismic risk analysis and vulnerability assessment, in Earthquake Blast and Impact: Measurement and effects of vibration, (The Society For Earthquake & Civil Engineering Dynamics, eds.), Elsevier Applied Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 19-28.
44. Spence, R. J. S., Coburn, A. W., and Pomonis, A., 1992. Correlation of ground motion with building damage: The definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale, in Proceedings of the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 551-556.
45. Sponheuer, W., 1962. Untersuchungen zur Seismizität von Deutschland, Veröffentlichungen des Instituts fuer Bodendynamik und Erdbebenforschung Jena 72, 23-52 (in German).
46. Sponheuer, W., and Karnik, V., 1964. Neue seismische Skala, in Proceedings of the 7th Symposium of the ESC, (W. Sponheuer, ed.), Jena 1962, Veröffentlichungen des Instituts fuer Bodendynamik und Erdbebenforschung Jena 77, 69-76 (in German).
47. Steinbrugge, K. V., 1982. Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tsunamis: An Anatomy of Hazards, Skandia America Group, New York, NY.
48. Sørensen, M. B., Stromeyer, D., and Grünthal, G., 2009. Attenuation of macroseismic intensity: A new relation for the Marmara Sea region, northwest Turkey, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99, 538-553, DOI: 10.1785/0120080299.
49. Turkish Ministry of Public Works and Settlement (TMPS), 1998. Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas, Part III -Earthquake Disaster Prevention, Ankara, Turkey, 84 pp.
50. Whitman, R. V., Anagnos, T., Kircher, C. A., Lagorio, H. J., Lawson, R. S., and Schneider, P., 1997. Development of a national earthquake loss estimation methodology, Earthquake Spectra 13, 643-661. (Pubitemid 127625909)
51. Yamazaki, F., Nishimura, A., and Ueno, Y., 1996. Estimation of human casualties due to urban earthquakes, in Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier Science Ltd, Paper no. 443.