Imaging Techniques in Osteoarthritis

PM and R

Volumn 4, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2012, Pages

  Hunter, David J ^a   Guermazi, Ali ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASE MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUG;

ANAMNESIS; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; BONE SCINTISCANNING; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE COURSE; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; JOINT EFFUSION; KELLGREN AND LAWRENCE SCALE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOPHYTE; PATHOGENESIS; PATIENT POSITIONING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYNOVITIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING;

ANTIRHEUMATIC AGENTS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE;

EID: 84864856286     PISSN: 19341482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Nuki G. Osteoarthritis: A problem of joint failure [review]. Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie 1999, 58:142-147.
2. Eyre D.R. Collagens and cartilage matrix homeostasis [review]. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2004, (427 Suppl):S118-S122.
3. Guccione A.A., Felson D.T., Anderson J.J., et al. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 1994, 84:351-358.
4. Hannan M.T., Felson D.T., Pincus T. Analysis of the discordance between radiographic changes and knee pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol 2000, 27:1513-1517.
5. Brandt K.D., Dieppe P., Radin E.L. Etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis [review]. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2008, 34:531-559.
6. Eckstein F., Mosher T., Hunter D. Imaging of knee osteoarthritis: Data beyond the beauty [review]. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007, 19:435-443.
7. Felson D.T., Chaisson C.E., Hill C.L., et al. The association of bone marrow lesions with pain in knee osteoarthritis [see comments]. Ann Intern Med 2001, 134:541-549.
8. Hunter D., Gale D., Grainger G., Lo G., Conaghan P. The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Ann Rheum Dis 2008, 67:206-211.
9. Torres L., Dunlop D.D., Peterfy C., et al. The relationship between specific tissue lesions and pain severity in persons with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006, 14:1033-1040.
10. Hill C.L., Gale D.G., Chaisson C.E., et al. Knee effusions, popliteal cysts, and synovial thickening: Association with knee pain in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2001, 28:1330-1337.
11. Hill C.L., Hunter D.J., Niu J., et al. Synovitis detected on magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to pain and cartilage loss in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 66:1599-1603.
12. Altman R.D. Classification of disease: Osteoarthritis [review]. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1991, 20(6 Suppl 2):40-47.
13. Cibere J. Do we need radiographs to diagnose osteoarthritis?. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006, 20:27-38. [review].
14. Kellgren J.H., Lawrence J.S. Atlas of Standard Radiographs 1963, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
15. Altman R.D., Hochberg M., Murphy W.A.J., Wolfe F., Lequesne M. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1995, 3(Suppl A):3-70.
16. Creamer P. Osteoarthritis pain and its treatment [review]. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2000, 12:450-455.
17. Mazzuca S.A., Brandt K.D., Lane K.A., Katz B.P. Knee pain reduces joint space width in conventional standing anteroposterior radiographs of osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 2002, 46:1223-1227.
18. NIH Consensus Development Conference: Total hip joint replacement. J Orthop Res 1983, 1:189-234. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, March 1-3, 1982. Proceedings.
19. Mazzuca S.A., Brandt K.D. Is knee radiography useful for studying the efficacy of a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug in human?. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2003, 29:819-830. [review].
20. Mazzuca S.A., Brandt K.D., Buckwalter K.A., Lequesne M. Pitfalls in the accurate measurement of joint space narrowing in semiflexed, anteroposterior radiographic imaging of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:2508-2515.
21. Hunter D.J., Zhang Y.Q., Tu X., et al. Change in joint space width: Hyaline articular cartilage loss or alteration in meniscus?. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 54:2488-2495.
22. Buckland-Wright J.C., Macfarlane D.G., Lynch J.A., Jasani M.K., Bradshaw C.R. Joint space width measures cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis of the knee: High resolution plain film and double contrast macroradiographic investigation. Ann Rheum Dis 1995, 54:263-268.
23. Leach R.E., Gregg T., Siber F.J. Weight-bearing radiography in osteoarthritis of the knee. Radiology 1970, 97:265-268.
24. Merle-Vincent F., Vignon E., Brandt K., et al. Superiority of the Lyon schuss view over the standing anteroposterior view for detecting joint space narrowing, especially in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment, in early knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 66:747-753.
25. Hellio Le Graverand M.P., Vignon E., Brandt K.D., et al. Head-to-head comparison of the Lyon-Schuss and fixed flexion radiographic techniques. Long-term reproducibility in normal knees and sensitivity to change in osteoarthritic knees. Ann Rheum Dis 2008, 67:1562-1566.
26. Ravaud P., Chastang C., Auleley G.R., et al. Assessment of joint space width in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: A comparison of 4 measuring instruments. J Rheumatol 1996, 23:1749-1755.
27. Duryea J., Zaim S., Genant H.K. New radiographic-based surrogate outcome measures for osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003, 11:102-110.
28. Conrozier T., Favret H., Mathieu P., et al. Influence of the quality of tibial plateau alignment on the reproducibility of computer joint space measurement from Lyon schuss radiographic views of the knee in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12:765-770.
29. Peterfy C., Li J., Zaim S., et al. Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: Test-retest reproducibility. Skeletal Radiol 2003, 32:128-132.
30. Reichmann W.M., Maillefert J.F., Hunter D.J., Katz J.N., Conaghan P.G., Losina E. Responsiveness to change and reliability of measurement of radiographic joint space width in osteoarthritis of the knee: A systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19:550-556.
31. Eckstein F., Burstein D., Link T.M. Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: Degenerative changes in osteoarthritis. NMR Biomed 2006, 19:822-854. [review].
32. Hunter D.J., Zhang W., Conaghan P.G., et al. Responsiveness and reliability of MRI in knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of published evidence. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19:589-605.
33. Peterfy C.G., Guermazi A., Zaim S., et al. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12:177-190.
34. Kornaat P.R., Ceulemans R.Y., Kroon H.M., et al. MRI assessment of knee osteoarthritis: Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System (KOSS)-inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of a compartment-based scoring system. Skeletal Radiol 2005, 34:95-102.
35. Hunter D.J., Guermazi A., Lo G.H., et al. Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19:990-1002.
36. Hunter D.J., Zhang W., Conaghan P.G., et al. Systematic review of the concurrent and predictive validity of MRI biomarkers in OA. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19:557-588.
37. Burgkart R., Glaser C., Hyhlik-Durr A., Englmeier K.H., Reiser M., Eckstein F. Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: Accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. Arthritis Rheum 2001, 44:2072-2077.
38. Graichen H., Eisenhart-Rothe R., Vogl T., Englmeier K.H., Eckstein F. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: Technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:811-816.
39. Berthiaume M.J., Raynauld J.P., Martel-Pelletier J., et al. Meniscal tear and extrusion are strongly associated with progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis as assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Rheum Dis 2005, 64:556-563.
40. Roemer F.W., Khrad H., Hayashi D., et al. Volumetric and semiquantitative assessment of MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow lesions in knee osteoarthritis: A comparison of contrast-enhanced and non-enhanced imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010, 18:1062-1066.
41. Fotinos-Hoyer A.K., Guermazi A., Jara H., et al. Assessment of synovitis in the osteoarthritic knee: Comparison between manual segmentation, semiautomated segmentation, and semiquantitative assessment using contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010, 64:604-609.
42. Habib S., Guermazi A., Ozonoff A., Hayashi D., Crema M.D., Roemer F.W. MRI-based volumetric assessment of joint effusion in knee osteoarthritis using proton density-weighted fat-suppressed and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed sequences. Skeletal Radiol 2011, 40:1581-1585.
43. Gray M.L., Burstein D. Molecular (and functional) imaging of articular cartilage [review]. J Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interact 2004, 4:365-368.
44. Guermazi A., Burstein D., Conaghan P., et al. Imaging in osteoarthritis [review]. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2008, 34:645-687.
45. Altman R., Asch E., Bloch D., et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 1986, 29:1039-1049.
46. Englund M., Guermazi A., Gale D., et al. Incidental meniscal findings on knee MRI in middle-aged and elderly persons. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1108-1115. [see comment].
47. Bhattacharyya T., Gale D., Dewire P., et al. The clinical importance of meniscal tears demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthritis of the knee [comment]. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2003, 85-A:4-9.
48. Englund M., Lohmander L.S. Risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fifteen to twenty-two years after meniscectomy. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:2811-2819.
49. Roos E.M., Ostenberg A., Roos H., et al. Long-term outcome of meniscectomy: Symptoms, function, and performance tests in patients with or without radiographic osteoarthritis compared to matched controls. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001, 9:316-324.
50. Henley M.B., Turkelson C., Jacobs J.J., Haralson R.H. Evidence-based medicine, the quality initiative, and P4P: Performance or paperwork?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:2781-2790. AOA symposium.
51. Extremity magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: Report of the American College of Rheumatology Extremity Magnetic Resonance Imaging Task Force. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 54:1034-1047. American College of Rheumatology Extremity Magnetic Resonance Imaging Task Force, American College of Rheumatology Extremity Magnetic Resonance Imaging Task Force, [see comment; review].
52. Hunter D.J., Sharma L., Skaife T. Alignment and osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(Suppl 1):85-89.