Dimensions of Judgment: Factor Analysis of Individual Differences

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 402-413

  Weaver, Elise A ^a   Stewart, Thomas R ^b  

^a HUMAN RESOURCES RESEARCH ORGANIZATION   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive ability; Individual differences; Judgment; Performance; Probability; Problem solving; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864807847     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: 10990771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.748     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Balzer, W. K., Doherty, M. E., & O'Connor, J. (1989). Effect of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 410-433.
2. Balzer, W. K., Sulsky, L. M., Hammer, L. B., & Sumner, K. E. (1992). Task information, cognitive information, or functional validity information: Which components of cognitive feedback affect performance? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 35-54.
3. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
4. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 938-956.
5. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2011). Explaining adult age differences in decision-making competence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. doi: 10.1002/bdm.712 (this issue).
6. Bruner, J. S. (1958). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
7. Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton.
8. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Canivez, G. I., Konold, T. R., Collins, J. M., & Wilson, G. (2009). Construct validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence and Wide Range Intelligence Test: convergent and structural validity. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(4), 252-265.
10. Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. K. (1986). A day at the races: A study of IQ, expertise, and cognitive complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 115(3), 255-266.
11. Chasseigne, G., Mullet, E., & Stewart, T. R. (1997). Aging and multiple cue probability learning: The case of inverse relationships. Acta Psychologica, 97, 235-252.
12. Del Missier, F., Mäntylä, T., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2011). Decision-making competence, executive functioning, and general cognitive abilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. doi: 10.1002/bdm.731 (this issue).
13. Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. NY: Oxford University Press.
14. Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Hammond, K. R., & Summers, D. A. (1965). Cognitive dependence on linear and nonlinear cues. Psychological Review, 72, 215-224.
16. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93(4), 411-428.
17. Holzworth, R. J. (1999). Annotated bibliography of cue probability learning studies. http://www.brunswik.org/resources/mcplbib.doc, Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut.
18. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
19. Klayman, J. (1988). Cue discovery in probabilistic environments: Uncertainty and experimentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(2), 317-330.
20. Lopes, L. L., & Oden, G. C. (1991). The rationality of intelligence. In E. Eells, & T. Maruszewski (Eds), Probability and rationality: Studies on L. Jonathan Cohen's philosophy of science. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
21. Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2005). Decision making competence: External validation through an individual-differences approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 1-27.
22. Payne, J., Bettman, J., & Johnson, E. (1993). The Adaptive Decision Maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition, 49(1-2), 123-163.
24. Ramachandran, V. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the brain: Probing the mysteries of the human mind. NY: Harper Perrenial.
25. Reagan-Cirincione, P. (1994). Improving the accuracy of group judgment: A process intervention combining group facilitation, social judgment analysis, and information technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 246-270.
26. Smedslund, J. (1955). Multiple probability learning. Oslo: Akademisk forlag.
27. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999). Individual differences in reasoning and the heuristics and biases debate. In P. L. Ackerman, & P. C. Kyllonen (Eds), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 389-411). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-665.
30. Tape, T. G., Kripal, J., & Wigton, R. S. (1992). Comparing methods of learning clinical prediction from case simulations. Medical Decision Making, 12, 213-221.
31. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
32. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
33. Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273-281.
34. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
35. Williams, P. E., Weiss, L. G., & Rolfhus, E. L. (2003). WISC-IV Technical Report #2: Psychometric Properties: The Psychological Corporation, a Harcourt Assessment Company (http://harcourtassessment.com/hai/Images/pdf/wisciv/WISCIVTechReport2.pdf).
36. Wright, G., Rowe, G., Bolger, F., & Gammack, J. (1994). Coherence, calibration, and expertise in judgmental probability forecasting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 1-25.