Urodynamics. Role in incontinence and prolapse: A urology perspective

Urologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 265-272

  Dillon, Benjamin E ^a   Lee, Dominic ^a   Lemack, Gary E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Burch colposuspension; Pelvic organ prolapse; Stress urinary incontinence; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; MICTURITION DISORDER; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; STRESS INCONTINENCE; TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URGE INCONTINENCE; URINE RETENTION; URODYNAMICS; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PROGNOSIS; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGY;

EID: 84864805993     PISSN: 00940143     EISSN: 1558318X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2012.05.001     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. In 2011 the baby boomers start to turn 65: 16 statistics about the coming retirement crisis that will drop your jaw. The American Dream. 2011 [online].
2. Olsen A.L., Smith V.J., Bergstrom J.O., et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997, 89(4):501-506.
3. Lee J., Dwyer P.L. Age-related trends in female stress urinary incontinence surgery in Australia-Medicare data for 1994-2009. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010, 50:543.
4. Klutke C., Siegel S., Carlin B., et al. Urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: incidence and treatment. Urology 2001, 58:697.
5. Ward R.M., Hampton B.S., Blume J.D., et al. The impact of multichannel urodynamics upon treatment recommendations for female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008, 19:1235.
6. Nager C.W., Brubaker L., Daneshgari F., et al. Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: a non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations. Contemp Clin Trials 2009, 30:531.
7. Nager C.W., FitzGerald M., Kraus S.R., et al. Urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women. J Urol 2008, 179:1470.
8. Kuhn A., Nager C.W., Hawkins E., et al. A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007, 18:931.
9. Weber A.M. Is urethral pressure profilometry a useful diagnostic test for stress urinary incontinence?. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2001, 56:720.
10. Albo M., Wruck L., Baker J., et al. The relationships among measures of incontinence severity in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2007, 177:1810.
11. Lemack G.E., Xu Y., Brubaker L., et al. Clinical and demographic factors associated with valsalva leak point pressure among women undergoing burch bladder neck suspension or autologous rectus fascial sling procedures. Neurourol Urodyn 2007, 26:392.
12. Nager C.W., Kraus S.R., Kenton K., et al. Urodynamics, the supine empty bladder stress test, and incontinence severity. Neurourol Urodyn 2010, 29:1306.
13. Bergman A., Koonings P.P., Ballard C.A. Proposed management of low urethral pressure type of genuine stress urinary incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1989, 27:155.
14. Koonings P.P., Bergman A., Ballard C.A. Low urethral pressure and stress urinary incontinence in women: risk factor for failed retropubic surgical procedure. Urology 1990, 36:245.
15. Sand P.K., Winkler H., Blackhurst D.W., et al. A prospective randomized study comparing modified Burch retropubic urethropexy and suburethral sling for treatment of genuine stress incontinence with low-pressure urethra. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000, 182:30.
16. Wadie B.S., El-Hefnawy A.S. Urethral pressure measurement in stress incontinence: does it help?. Int Urol Nephrol 2009, 41:491.
17. Chaikin D.C., Rosenthal J., Blaivas J.G. Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: long-term analysis. J Urol 1998, 160:1312.
18. Rodriguez L.V., de Almeida F., Dorey F., et al. Does valsalva leak point pressure predict outcome after the distal urethral polypropylene sling? Role of urodynamics in the sling era. J Urol 2004, 172:210.
19. Barber M.D., Kleeman S., Karram M.M., et al. Risk factors associated with failure 1 year after retropubic or transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 199:666.e1.
20. Costantini E., Lazzeri M., Giannantoni A., et al. Preoperative MUCP and VLPP did not predict long-term (4-Year) outcome after transobturator mid-urethral sling. Urol Int 2009, 83:392.
21. Nager C.W., Sirls L., Litman H.J., et al. Baseline urodynamic predictors of treatment failure 1 year after mid urethral sling surgery. J Urol 2011, 186:597.
22. Rechberger T., Futyma K., Jankiewicz K., et al. The clinical effectiveness of retropubic (IVS-02) and transobturator (IVS-04) midurethral slings: randomized trial. Eur Urol 2009, 56:24.
23. Wang A.C., Chen M.C. The correlation between preoperative voiding mechanism and surgical outcome of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure, with reference to quality of life. BJU Int 2003, 91:502.
24. Kirby A.C., Nager C.W., Litman H.J., et al. Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 2011, 22:657.
25. Bunyavejchevin S. Can pre-operative urodynamic study predict the successful outcome of tension free vaginal tape (TVT) operation in Thai women with stress urinary incontinence?. J Med Assoc Thai 2005, 88:1493.
26. Duckett J.R., Tamilselvi A. Effect of tension-free vaginal tape in women with a urodynamic diagnosis of idiopathic detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence. BJOG 2006, 113:30.
27. Albo M.E. The trial of mid-urethral slings (TOMUS): design and methodology. J Applied Res 2008, 8:1.
28. Albo M.E., Richter H.E., Brubaker L., et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:2143.
29. Miller E.A., Amundsen C.L., Toh K.L., et al. Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling. J Urol 2003, 169:2234.
30. Lemack G.E., Krauss S., Litman H., et al. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling. J Urol 2008, 180:2076.
31. Kraus S. Urodynamic changes 12 months after retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings. In: AUA Annual Meeting Washington, DC, May, 2011.
32. Wang K.H., Neimark M., Davila G.W. Voiding dysfunction following TVT procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002, 13:353.
33. Panayi D.C., Duckett J., Digesu G.A., et al. Pre-operative opening detrusor pressure is predictive of detrusor overactivity following TVT in patients with pre-operative mixed urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2009, 28:82.
34. Alperin M., Abrahams-Gessel S., Wakamatsu M.M. Development of de novo urge incontinence in women post sling: the role of preoperative urodynamics in assessing the risk. Neurourol Urodyn 2008, 27:407.
35. Kenton K., Richter H., Litman H., et al. Risk factors associated with urge incontinence after continence surgery. J Urol 2009, 182:2805.
36. Klutke J.J., Klutke C.G., Bergman J., et al. Urodynamics changes in voiding after anti-incontinence surgery: an insight into the mechanism of cure. Urology 1999, 54:1003.
37. Belair G., Tessier J., Bertrand P.E., et al. Retropubic cystourethropexy: is it an obstructive procedure?. J Urol 1997, 158:533.
38. Kraus S.R., Lemack G.E., Richter H.E., et al. Changes in urodynamic measures two years after Burch colposuspension or autologous sling surgery. Urology 2011, 78:1263.
39. Kraus S.R., Lemack G.E., Sirls L.T., et al. Urodynamic changes associated with successful stress urinary incontinence surgery: is a little tension a good thing?. Urology 2011, 78:1257.
40. Fulford S.C., Flynn R., Barrington J., et al. An assessment of the surgical outcome and urodynamic effects of the pubovaginal sling for stress incontinence and the associated urge syndrome. J Urol 1999, 162:135.
41. Mitsui T., Tanaka H., Moriya K., et al. Clinical and urodynamic outcomes of pubovaginal sling procedure with autologous rectus fascia for stress urinary incontinence. Int J Urol 2007, 14:1076.
42. Lukacz E.S., Luber K.M., Nager C.W. The effects of the tension-free vaginal tape on voiding function: a prospective evaluation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004, 15:32.
43. Sander P., Sorensen F., Lose G. Does the tension-free vaginal tape procedure (TVT) affect the voiding function over time? Pressure-flow studies 1 year and 3(1/2) years after TVT. Neurourol Urodyn 2007, 26:995.
44. Borstad E., Rud T. The risk of developing urinary stress-incontinence after vaginal repair in continent women. A clinical and urodynamic follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989, 68:545.
45. Roovers J.P., van Laar J.O., Loffeld C., et al. Does urodynamic investigation improve outcome in patients undergoing prolapse surgery?. Neurourol Urodyn 2007, 26:170.
46. Jha S., Toozs-Hobson P., Parsons M., et al. Does preoperative urodynamics change the management of prolapse?. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008, 28:320.
47. Visco A.G., Brubaker L., Nygaard I., et al. The role of preoperative urodynamic testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy: the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized surgical trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008, 19:607.
48. Mueller E.R., Kenton K., Mahajan S., et al. Urodynamic prolapse reduction alters urethral pressure but not filling or pressure flow parameters. J Urol 2007, 177:600.
49. Ballert K.N., Biggs G.Y., Isenalumhe A., et al. Managing the urethra at transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a urodynamic approach. J Urol 2009, 181:679.
50. Elser D.M., Moen M.D., Stanford E.J., et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and urinary incontinence: surgical planning based on urodynamics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010, 202:375.e1.
51. Nager C.W., Brubaker L., Litman H.J., et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med 2012, 366:1987.