Impact of coronary bifurcation angle on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in real-world practice: Results from the COBIS registry

Cardiology (Switzerland)

Volumn 122, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 216-224

  Yang, Jeong Hoon ^a   Song, Young Bin ^a   Song, Pil Sang ^a   Hahn, Joo Yong ^a   Choi, Seung Hyuk ^a   Choi, Jin Ho ^a   Lee, Sang Hoon ^a   Kim, Hyo Soo ^b   Jang, Yangsoo ^c   Tahk, Seung Jea ^f   Seung, Ki Bae ^d   Park, Seung Jung ^e   Gwon, Hyeon Cheol ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^d The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^e Asan Medical Center   (South Korea)

^f Ajou University Medical CentSuwon   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Bifurcation lesions; Drug eluting stent

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIFURCATION ANGLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; CORONARY BIFURCATION LESION; FEMALE; FINAL KISSING BALLOONING; FOLLOW UP; GUIDE WIRE; HEART DEATH; HEART DISEASE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIDE BRANCH BALLOONING; SIDE BRANCH STENTING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; REGISTRIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84864803823     PISSN: 00086312     EISSN: 14219751     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000338817     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dzavik V, Kharbanda R, Ivanov J, Ing DJ, Bui S, Mackie K, Ramsamujh R, Barolet A, Schwartz L, Seidelin PH: Predictors of long-term outcome after crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: importance of the bifurcation angle. Am Heart J 2006; 152:762-769. (Pubitemid 44396889)
2. Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Chen YD, Fang WY, Wei M, He B, Sun XW, Yang S, Chen JG, Shan SJ, Tian NL, Li XB, Liu ZZ, Kan J, Michael L, W KT: Effect of coronary bifurcation angle on clinical outcomes in Chinese patients treated with crush stenting: a subgroup analysis from DKCRUSH-1 bifurcation study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009; 122: 396-402.
3. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW: Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007; 115: 2344-2351. (Pubitemid 46685903)
4. Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M: A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006; 59: 183.
5. Lansky A, Tuinenburg J, Costa M, Maeng M, Koning G, Popma J, Cristea E, Gavit L, Costa R, Rares A, Van Es GA, Lefevre T, Reiber H, Louvard Y, Morice MC: Quantitative angio-graphic methods for bifurcation lesions: a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Group. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 258-266.
6. Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Choi JH, Lee SH, Jeong MH, Kim HS, Seong IW, Yang JY, Rha SW, Jang Y, Yoon JH, Tahk SJ, Seung KB, Park SJ, Gwon HC: Sirolimus-versus pacli-taxel-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary bifurcations results: from the COBIS (coronary bifurcation stenting) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:1743-1750.
7. Tanabe K, Hoye A, Lemos PA, Aoki J, Aram-patzis CA, Saia F, Lee CH, Degertekin M, Hofma SH, Sianos G, McFadden E, Smits PC, van der Giessen WJ, de Feyter P, van Dom-burg RT, Serruys PW: Restenosis rates following bifurcation stenting with sirolimus-eluting stents for de novo narrowings. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 115-118. (Pubitemid 38813465)
8. Iakovou I, Ge L, Colombo A: Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:1446-1455. (Pubitemid 41446178)
9. Collins N, Seidelin PH, Daly P, Ivanov J, Barolet A, Mackie K, Bui S, Schwartz L, Dza-vik V: Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation nar-rowings. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102:404-410.
10. Gao Z, Yang YJ, Gao RL: Comparative study of simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions in daily practice in Chinese patients. Clin Cardiol 2008; 31:317-322. (Pubitemid 352040154)
11. Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, Curzen NP, Clayton TC, Oldroyd KG, Bennett L, Holmberg S, Cotton JM, Glennon PE, Thomas MR, Maccarthy PA, Baumbach A, Mulvihill NT, Henderson RA, Redwood SR, Starkey IR, Stables RH: Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation 2010; 121:1235-1243.
12. Zhang F, Dong L, Ge J: Simple versus complex stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Heart 2009; 95:1676-1681.
13. Routledge HC, Morice MC, Lefevre T, Garot P, De Marco F, Vaquerizo B, Louvard Y: 2-year outcome of patients treated for bifurcation coronary disease with provisional side branch T-stenting using drug-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 1: 358-365.
14. Gil RJ, Vassilev D, Formuszewicz R, Rusicka-Piekarz T, Doganov A: The carina angle-new geometrical parameter associated with peri-procedural side branch compromise and the long-term results in coronary bifurcation lesions with main vessel stenting only. J Interv Cardiol 2009; 22:E1-E10.
15. Cho GY, Lee CW, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ: Effects of stent design on side branch occlusion after coronary stent placement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 18-23. (Pubitemid 32066471)
16. Iijima R, Tsunoda T, Yamamoto M, Shiba M, Wada M, Tsuji T, Yamamoto M, Nakajima R, Yoshitama T, Hara H, Hara H, Nakamura M: Fate of unprotected side branches as related to embolic complications during stent implantation for acute coronary syndromes using a distal protection procedure. Am J Car-diol 2005; 95:636-639. (Pubitemid 40255257)
17. Korn HV, Yu J, Ohlow MA, Huegl B, Schulte W, Wagner A, Wassmer G, Gruene S, Petek O, Lauer B: Interventional therapy of bifurcation lesions: a TIMI flow-guided concept to treat side branches in bifurcation lesions-A prospective randomized clinical study (Thueringer Bifurcation Study, Thuebis Study as pilot trial). Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 535-542.
18. Koo BK, Waseda K, Kang HJ, Kim HS, Nam CW, Hur SH, Kim JS, Choi D, Jang Y, Hahn JY, Gwon HC, Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Chung WY, Cho YS, Choi DJ, Hasegawa T, Kataoka T, Oh SJ, Honda Y, Fitzgerald PJ, Fearon WF: Anatomic and functional evaluation of bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc In-terv 2010; 3:113-119.
19. Vassilev D, Gil RJ: Relative dependence of diameters of branches in coronary bifurcations after stent implantation in main vessel-importance of carina position. Kardiol Pol 2008; 66:371-378.
20. Oyama N, Urasawa K, Sakai H, Kitabatake A: Side branch protection with hydrophilic polymer coated guide wire during cutting balloon angioplasty of a bifurcated lesion. Jpn Heart J 2003; 44: 565-573. (Pubitemid 41518994)
21. Aminian A, Dolatabadi D, Lalmand J: Small balloon inflation over a jailed wire as a bailout technique in a case of abrupt side branch occlusion during provisional stenting. J Invasive Cardiol 2010; 22: 449-452.