Predicting protein functions from PPI networks using functional aggregation

Mathematical Biosciences

Volumn 240, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 63-69

  Hou, Jingyu ^a   Chi, Xiaoxiao ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Choquet Integral; Function prediction; Protein interaction

Indexed keywords

CHOQUET-INTEGRAL; DATA SETS; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; FUNCTION PREDICTION; FUNCTIONAL CORRELATION; FUNCTIONAL INFORMATION; FUZZY THEORY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT TECHNOLOGIES; INNOVATIVE METHOD; MUTUAL CORRELATIONS; PREDICTION ALGORITHMS; PREDICTION METHODS; PROTEIN FUNCTIONS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS;

ALGORITHMS; FORECASTING; PROTEINS;

INTEGRAL EQUATIONS;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; DATA SET; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; PREDICTION; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL AGGREGATION; FUZZY SYSTEM; PREDICTION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THEORY;

ALGORITHMS; FUZZY LOGIC; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84864746280     PISSN: 00255564     EISSN: 18793134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Schwikowski B., Uetz P., Fields S. A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nature Biotechnology 2000, 18(12):1257.
2. Fields S. High-throughput two-hybrid analysis, the promise and the peril. FEBS Journal 2005, 272:5391.
3. Sharan R., Ulitsky I., Shamir R. Network-based prediction of protein function. Molecular Systems Biology 2007, 3:88.
4. Hishigaki H., Nakai K., Ono T., Tanigami A., Takagi T. Assessment of prediction accuracy of protein function from protein-protein interaction data. Yeast 2001, 18:523.
5. Chua H., Sung W., Wong L. Exploiting indirect neighbours and topological weight to predict protein function from protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(13):1623.
6. Vazquez A., Flammini A., Maritan A., Vespignani A. Global protein function prediction from protein-protein interaction networks. Nature Biotechnology 2003, 21:697.
7. Karaoz U., Murali T.M., Letovsky S., Zheng Y., Ding C., Cantor C.R., Kasif S. Whole-genome annotation by using evidence integration in functional-linkage networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101:2888.
8. Nabieva E., Jim K., Agarwal A., Chazelle B., Singh M. Whole proteome prediction of protein function via graph-theoretic analysis of interaction maps. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(Suppl 1):i302.
9. Brun C., Chevenet F., Martin D., Wojcik J., Guénoche A., Jacq B. Functional classification of proteins for the prediction of cellular function from a protein-protein interaction network. Genome Biology 2004, 5(1). 5:R6.
10. Kirac M., Ozsoyoglu G., Yang J. Annotating proteins by mining protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(14):e260.
11. J. Chen, W. Hsu, M.L. Lee, S.K. Ng, Labeling network motifs in protein interactomes for protein function prediction, in: IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2007) pp. 546-55.
12. Pandey G., Myers C.L., Kumar V. Incorporating functional inter-relationships into protein function prediction algorithms. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:142.
13. Deng M., Zhang K., Mehta S., Chen T., Sun F. Prediction of protein function using protein-protein interaction data. Journal of Computational Biology 2003, 10:947.
14. Ashburner M., Ball C., Blake J., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J., Davis A., Dolinski K., Dwight S., Eppig J. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 2000, 25(1):25.
15. Ruepp A., Zollner A., Maier D., Albermann K., Hani J., Mokrejs M., Tetko I., Güldener U., Mannhaupt G., Münsterkötter M., Mewes H.W. The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 2004, 32(18):5539. 14.
16. Xu T., Du L.F., Zhou Y. Evaluation of GO-based functional similarity measures using S. cerevisiae protein interaction and expression profile data. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:472.
17. Resnik P. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. Proceedings of International Joint Conference for Artificial Intelligence 1995, 448-453.
18. Jiang J., Conrath D. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. Proceedings of International Conference Research on Computational Linguistics 1997, 19-33.
19. D. Lin, An information-theoretic definition of similarity, in: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 1998, pp. 296-304.
20. Zhu W., Hou J., Chen Y-P.P. Semantic and layered protein function prediction from PPI networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2010, 267(2):129.
21. G. Chen, J. Wang, M. Li, GO semantic similarity based analysis for human protein interactions, in: International Joint Conference on Bioinformatics, Systems Biology and Intelligent Computing (IJCBS 2009), pp. 207-210.
22. Chi X., Hou J. An iterative approach of protein function prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:437.
23. Hüllermeier E. The Choquet-integral as an aggregation operator in case-based learning. Computational Intelligence, Theory and Applications 2006, 615.
24. Dwight S., Harris M., Dolinski K., Ball C., Binkley G., Christie K., Fisk D., Issel-Tarver L., Schroeder M., Sherlock G. Saccharomyces genome database (SGD) provides secondary gene annotation using the gene ontology (GO). Nucleic Acids Research 2002, 30(1):69.