The effect of circle hooks on shark catchability and at-vessel mortality rates in longlines fisheries

Bulletin of Marine Science

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 469-483

  Godin, Aurélie C ^a   Carlson, John K ^b   Burgener, Valérie ^c  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b SOUTHEAST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c Rue de l'Orangerie 6 ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATCHABILITY; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHING GEAR; FISHING MORTALITY; FISHING VESSEL; LONGLINING; META-ANALYSIS; SHARK; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

CHELONIIDAE; CHONDRICHTHYES; ELASMOBRANCHII; TESTUDINES;

EID: 84864742787     PISSN: 00074977     EISSN: 15536955     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5343/bms.2011.1054     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Aalbers SA, Bernal D, Sepulveda CA . 2010. The functional role of the caudal fin in the feeding ecology of the common thresher shark, Alopias vulpinus. J Fish Biol. 76:1863-1868. PMid:20557638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1095-8649.2010.02616.x
2. Afonso AS , Hazin FHV , Carvalho F, Pacheco JC, Hazin H, Kerstetter DW, Murie D, Burgess GH. 2011. Fishing gear modifications to reduce elasmobranch mortality in pelagic and bottom longline fisheries off Northeast Brazil. Fish Res. 108:336-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.01.007
3. Beverly S, Park T. 2009. Longline terminal gear identification guide. Secretariat of the Pacific Community.
4. Borucinska J, Martin J, Skomal G. 2001. Peritonitis and pericarditis associated with gastric perforation by a retained fishing hook in a blue shark (Prionace glauca) (Linnaeus, 1758). J Aquat Animal Health. 13:347-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8667(2001)0132.0.CO ;2
5. Borucinska J, Kohler N, Natanson L, Skomal G. 2002. Pathology associated with retained fishing hooks in blue sharks (Prionace glauca) with implications for their conservation. J Fish Disease. 25:515-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j. 1365-2761.2002.00396.x
6. Bolten AB , Martins HR , Isidro E, Santos M, Ferreira R, Bettencourt E, Giga A, Cruz A, Bjorndal KA . 2005. Experiment to evaluate gear modification on rates of sea turtle bycatch in the longline fishery in the Azores. Phase 4. Final project report submitted to the US National Marine Fisheries Service. Florida, USA.
7. Camhi MD, Valenti SV , Fordham SV , Fowler SL , Gibson C. 2009. The conservation status of pelagic sharks and rays. Report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Pelagic Shark Red List Workshop. IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group. Newbury, UK. x + 78
8. Campana SE , Marks L, Joyce W, Kohler NE . 2006. Effects of recreational and commercial fishing on blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in Atlantic Canada, with inferences on the North Atlantic population. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 63:670-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f05-251 (Pubitemid 43773985)
9. Campana SE , Joyce W, Manning MJ. 2009. Bycatch and discard mortality in commercially caught blue sharks Prionace glauca assessed using archival satellite pop-up tags. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 387:241-253. http://dx.doi.org/10. 3354/meps08109
10. Carruthers EH , Schneider DC , Neilson JD. 2009. Estimating the odds of survival and identifying mitigation opportunities for common bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries. Biol Conserv. 142:2620-2630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. biocon.2009.06.010
11. Coelho R, Erzini K. 2008. Effects of fishing methods on deep water shark species caught as by-catch off southern Portugal. Hydrobiologia. 606:187-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9335-y (Pubitemid 351533965)
12. Coelho R, Santos MN, Amorim S. 2012. Effects of hook and bait on targeted and bycatch fishes in an equatorial Atlantic pelagic longline fishery. Bull Mar Sci. 88:59-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5343/bms.2011.1064
13. Cooke SJ, Suski CD . 2004. Are circle hooks and effective tool for conserving marine and freshwater recreational catch-and-release fisheries? Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshwat Ecosyst. 14:299-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.614 (Pubitemid 38791220)
14. Curran D, Bigelow K. 2011. Effects of circle hooks on pelagic catches in the Hawaii-based tuna longline fishery. Fish Res. 109:265-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.02.013
15. DerSimonian R, Laird N. 1986. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 7:177-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 (Pubitemid 17189972)
16. Diaz GA, Serafy JE. 2005. Longline-caught blue shark (Prionace glauca): Factors affecting the numbers available for live release. Fish Bull. 103:720-724. (Pubitemid 41703253)
17. Dulvy NK , Baum JK, Clarke S, Compagno LJV, Cortes E, Domingo A, Fordham S, Fowler SL , Malcom FP, Gibson C, et al. 2008. You can swim but you can't hide: The global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshwat Ecosyst. 482:459-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc. 975
18. Falterman B, Graves JE. 2002. A preliminary comparison of the relative mortality and hooking efficiency of circle and straight shank ("J") hooks used in the pelagic longline industry. Am Fish Soc Symp. 30:80-87. (Pubitemid 41250559)
19. FAO Fisheries Department. Guidelines to reduce sea turtle mortality in fishing operations. Rome, FAO . 2009. 128
20. FAO . Fishing operations. 2. Best practices to reduce incidental catch of seabirds in capture fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries. No. 1, Suppl. 2. Rome, FAO . 2009. 49
21. US Fed Reg. 2011. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf, and South Atlantic. 50 C.F.R.S 622. (Last updated December 5, 2011).
22. Galeana-Villasenor I, Galvan-Magana F, Gomez-Aguilar R. 2008. Influence of hook type and fishing depth on longline catches of sharks and other pelagic species in the northwest Mexican Pacific. Rev Biol Marl Oceanogr. 43:99-110.
23. Galeana-Villasenor I, Galvan-Magana F, Santana-Hernandez H. 2009. Fishing by hooks in longliners from the Mexican Pacific Ocean: effects in the catch rate and weight of sharks and other species. Rev Biol Marl Oceanogr. 44:163-172.
24. Gilman E, Zollett E, Beverly S, Nakano H, Davis K, Shiode D, Dalzell P, Kinan I. 2006. Reducing sea turtle by-catch in pelagic longline fisheries. Fish Fish. 7:2-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2006.00196.x
25. Gilman E, Kobayashi D, Swenarton T, Brothers N, Dalzell P, Kinan-kelly I. 2007. Reducing sea turtle interactions in the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery. Biol Conserv. 139:19-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.002 (Pubitemid 47320609)
26. Gilman E, Clarke S, Brothers N, Alfaroshigueto J, Mandelman J, Mangel J, Petersen S, Piovano S, Thomson N, Dalzell P. 2008. Shark interactions in pelagic longline fisheries. Mar Pol. 32:1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007. 05.001 (Pubitemid 351200312)
27. Hale LF , Gulak SJB, Napier AM , Carlson JK. 2011. Characterization of the shark bottom longline fishery, 2010. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-611. 35
28. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG , Deeks JJ, Altman DG . 2003. Measuring inconsistency in metaanalyses. BMJ. 327:557-60. PMid:12958120. PMCid:192859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
29. Ingram W, Henwood T, Grace M, Jones L, Driggers W, Mitchell K. 2005. Catch rates, distribution, and size composition of large coastal sharks collected during NOAA Fisheries bottom longline surveys from the US Gulf of Mexico and US Atlantic Ocean National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula, Mississippi-SEDAR 11 LCS 05/06-DW-27.
30. Kerstetter D, Graves J. 2006. Effects of circle vs J-style hooks on target and non-target species in a pelagic longline fishery. Fish Res. 80:239-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2006.03.032 (Pubitemid 44764771)
31. Kim S-S, Moon D-Y, An D-H, Koh J-R. 2006. Comparison of circle hook and J hook catch rate for target and bycatch species taken in the Korean tuna longline fishery. Paper presented at the Second Regular Session of the Scientific Committee, 7-18 August, 2006. Manila, Philippines. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission WCPFC-SC 2-2006/EB WP-12.
32. Kim S-S, Moon D-Y, An D-H, Koh J-R. 2007. Comparison of circle hook and J hook catch rate for target and bycatch species taken in the Korean tuna longline fishery during 2005-2006. Paper presented at the Third Regular Session of the Scientific Committee, 13-24 August, 2007. Honolulu, United States. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission WCPFC-SC 3-EB SWG/WP-11.
33. Lewison RL , Crowder LB , Read AJ, Freeman SA. 2004. Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:598-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.004 (Pubitemid 39366796)
34. Musick JA. 1999. Ecology and conservation of long-lived marine animals. In: Musick JA, editor. Proceedings of Symposium 23: Life in the Slow Lane: Ecology and Conservation of Long-Lived Marine Animals, Monterey, CA , 24 August, 1997. p. 1-10. (American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD.
35. Nakano H, Matsunaga H, Okamoto H, Okazaki M. 2003. Acoustic tracking of bigeye thresher shark Alopias superciliosus in the Eastern Pacific Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 265:255-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps265255 (Pubitemid 38171102)
36. Pacheco JC, Kerstetter DW, Hazin FH, Hazin H, Segundo RSSL , Graves JE, Carvalho F, Travassos PE. 2011. A comparison of circle hook and J hook performance in a western equatorial Atlantic Ocean pelagic longline fishery. Fish Res. 107:39-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2010.10.003
37. Piovano S, Clò S, Giacoma C. 2010. Reducing longline bycatch: The larger the hook, the fewer the stingrays. Biol Conserv. 143:261-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.001
38. Promjinda S, Siriraksophon S, Darumas N, Chaidee P. 2008. Efficiency of the circle hook in comparison with J-hook in longline fishery. The ecosystem-based fishery management in the Bay of Bengal. SEAFDEC Organization.
39. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.R-project.org.
40. Sales G, Giffoni BB, Fiedler FN, Azevedo VG, Kotas JE, Swimmer Y, Bugoni L. 2010. Circle hook effectiveness for the mitigation of sea turtle bycatch and capture of target species in a Brazilian pelagic longline fishery. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshwat Ecosyst. 20:428-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1106
41. Serafy JE, Kerstetter DW, Rice PH. 2009. Can circle hook use benefit billfishes? Fish Fish. 10:132-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008. 00298.x
42. Ward P, Myers RA , Blanchard W. 2004. A fish lost at sea: The effect of soak time on pelagic longline catches. Fish Bull. 102:179-195. (Pubitemid 38319096)
43. Ward P, Hindmarsh S. 2007. An overview of historical changes in the fishing gear and practices of pelagic longliners, with particular reference to Japan's Pacific fleet. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 17:501-516. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s11160-007-9051-0 (Pubitemid 350055051)
44. Ward P, Epe S, Kreutz D, Lawrence E, Robins C, Sands A. 2009. The effects of circle hooks on bycatch and target catches in Australia's pelagic longline fishery. Fish Res. 97:253-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2009.02.009
45. Watson JW, Epperly SP, Shah AK , Foster DG . 2005. Fishing methods to reduce sea turtle mortality associated with pelagic longlines. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 62:965-981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f05-004 (Pubitemid 41284429)
46. Watson J, kerstetter dW. 2006. Pelagic longline fi shing gear: A brief history and discussion of researcheff orts to improve selectivity and sustainability. mar Technol soc J. 40:5-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.4031/ 002533206787353259
47. Western and central Pacifi c fisheries commission (WcPfc). 2008. conservation and management of sea turtles. conservation and management measures, and resolutions (cmm) resolution 2008-03.
48. Yokota K, Kiyota M, Minami H. 2006. shark catch in a pelagic longline fi shery: Comparison of circle and tuna hooks. fish res. 81: 337-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2006.08.006 (Pubitemid 44427956)