Influence of hook type and fishing depth on longline catches of sharks and other pelagic species in the northwest Mexican Pacific;Influencia del tipo de enzuelo y la profundidad de pesca en la captura con palangre de tiburones y otras especies pelágicas al noroeste del Pacífico mexicano

Revista de Biologia Marina y Oceanografia

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 99-110

  Galeana Vellaseñor, Ildefonso ^a   Galván Magaña, Felipe ^b   Gómez Aguilar, Roberto ^c  

^a Instituto Tecnológico de Mazatlán Calle Corsario 1   (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE NAYARIT   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Gulf of California; Large pelagics; Sharks

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CATCH STATISTICS; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; PELAGIC FISH; SHARK;

GULF OF CALIFORNIA; PACIFIC OCEAN;

CHONDRICHTHYES; ISTIOPHORUS; ISTIOPHORUS PLATYPTERUS; MAKAIRA NIGRICANS; PRIONACE GLAUCA; SCOMBRIDAE; TETRAPTURUS AUDAX;

EID: 51549116444     PISSN: 07173326     EISSN: 07181957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bach P, P Travassos & D Gaertner. 2006. Why the number of hooks per basket (HPB) is not a good Proxy indicator of the maximum fishing depth in drifting longline fisheries? Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 59(2): 701-715.
2. Bacheler NM & JA Buckel. 2004. Does hook type influence the catch rate, size, and injury of grouper in a North Carolina commercial fishery? Fisheries Research 69: 303-311.
3. Baranov FI. 1976. Selected works on fishing wear. Volume I. Commercial fishing techniques, 631 pp. Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem.
4. Berry DA. 1987. Logarithmic transformations in ANOVA. Biometric 43: 439-456.
5. Bigelow KA, CH Bogas & X He. 1999. Environmental effects on swordfish and blue shark catch rate in the US North Pacific longline fishery. Fisheries Oceanography 8(3): 178-198.
6. Block BA & D Booth. 1992. Direct measurement of swimming speed and depth of blue marlin. Journal of Experimental Biology 166: 267-284.
7. Boggs CH. 1992. Depth, capture time, and hooked longevity of longline-caught pelagic fish: Timing byte of fish with chips. Fishery Bulletin 90: 642-658.
8. Brill RW, DB Holts, RKC Chang, S Sullivan, H Dewar & FG Carey. 1993. Vertical and horizontal movements of striped marlin (Tetrapturus audax) near the Hawaiian Island, determined by ultrasonic telemetry, with simultaneous measurement of oceanic currents. Marine Biology 117: 567-574.
9. Broadhurst MK & FH Hazin. 2001. Influences of type and orientation of byte on catch of swordfish (Xiphias gladius) and other species in an artisanal sub-surface longline fishery off northeastern Brazil. Fisheries Research 53: 169-179.
10. Bucki F. 1981. Principios Generales de Cálculo de las Artes de Pesca. Serie de Materiales Didácticos en Ciencia y Tecnología del Mar, 77 pp. Secretaría de Educación Pública, México.
11. Carrera-Fernández M. 2004. Biología reproductiva del tiburón azul Prionace glauca (Linnaeus, 1758 en la costa occidental de Baja California Sur, México. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias, CICIMAR-IPN, México, 67 pp.
12. CONAPESCA-INP. 2004. Plan de Acción Nacional para el Manejo y Conservación de Tiburones, Rayas y Especies Afines en México, 80 pp. Comisión Nacional de Acuacultura y Pesca e Instituto Nacional de la Pesca, Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Mazatlán, México.
13. Cooke SJ & CD Suski. 2004. Are circle hooks an effective tool for conserving marine and freshwater recreational catch-and-release fisheries? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 299-326.
14. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2007. Norma oficial mexicana. NOM-029-PESC-2006. Pesca responsable de tiburones y rayas. Especificación para su aprovechamiento, 43 pp. Miércoles 14 de febrero de 2007. Primera sección. Secretaria de Gobernación, Mexico.
15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2005. Report of the Technical Consultation on Sea Turtle Conservation and Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Report 765: 1-31.
16. Fridman AL. 1976. Theory and design of commercial fishing gear. 489 pp. Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem.
17. Goodyear CP. 1999. An analysis of possible utility of time-area closures to minimize billfish bycatch by U.S. pelagic longline. Fishery Bulletin 97: 243-255.
18. Johannes RE. 1981. Words of the Lagoon: Fishing and Marine Lore in the Palau District of Micronesia, 245 pp. University of California Press, Los Angeles.
19. Kaimmer S. 1999. Direct observation on the hooking behavior on Pacific halibut, Hippoglossus stenolepis. Fishery Bulletin 97: 873-883.
20. Kerstetter DW & JE Graves. 2006. Effects of the circle versus J-style hooks on target and no-target species in a pelagic longline fisheries. Fisheries Research 80: 239-250.
21. Kooke SJ & CD Suski. 2004. Are circle hooks an effective tool for conserving marine and freshwater recreational catch-and-release fisheries. Case studies and reviews. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 299-326.
22. LØkkeborg S. 1994. Fish behavior and longline. En: Fernö A & S Olsen (eds). Marine fish behavior in capture an abundance estimation, pp. 9-27. Fishing New Books, Oxford.
23. Santana-Hernández H, R Macías-Zamora & JJ Valdez-Flores. 1998. Selectivity of the longline system used by the Mexican fleet in the Exclusive Economic Zone. Ciencias Marinas 24(2): 193-2 10.
24. Trujillo E & G Martínez. 2003. Estimación de la profundidad de trabajo de anzuelos de un palangre atunero prototipo de la flota atunera de Isla de Margarita (Venezuela). Investigaciones Marinas 31(2): 25-34.
25. Yokota K, M Kiyota & H Minami. 2006. Shark catch in a pelagic longline fishery: comparison of circlce and tuna hooks. Fisheries Research 81: 337-341.