Triple negative breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of residual invasive carcinoma after lumpectomy

Cancer

Volumn 118, Issue 16, 2012, Pages 3893-3898

  Sioshansi, Shirin ^a,b   Ehdaivand, Shahrzad ^c,d,e   Cramer, Christina ^d   Lomme, Michele M ^c,d   Price, Lori Lyn ^f   Wazer, David E ^c,e,f,g  

^a UMASS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; breast conservation surgery; local recurrence; molecular phenotype; molecular subtype; radioresistance; radiotherapy; triple negative

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RISK; CANCER STAGING; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPH VESSEL METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AMINOPYRINE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DRUG COMBINATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PHENYLBUTAZONE; RISK;

EID: 84864710363     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27376     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000; 406: 747-752.
2. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 10869-10874.
3. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 8418-8423.
4. Sotiriou C, Neo SY, McShane LM, et al. Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 10393-10398.
5. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006; 295: 2492-2502.
6. Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10: 5367-5374.
7. Nguyen PL, Taghian AG, Katz MK, et al. Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 2373-2378.
8. Millar EK, Graham PH, O'Toole SA, et al. Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4701-4708.
9. Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Li T, Nicolaou N,. Locoregional recurrence of triple-negative breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery and radiation. Cancer. 2009; 115: 946-951.
10. Voduc KD, Cheang MC, Tyldesley S, Gelmon K, Nielsen TO, Kennecke H,. Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 1684-1691.
11. Billar JA, Dueck AC, Stucky CC, et al. Triple-negative breast cancers: unique clinical presentation and outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17 (suppl 3): 384-390.
12. Kyndi M, Sørensen FB, Knudsen H, Overgaard M, Nielsen HM, Overgaard J,; Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and response to postmastectomy radiotherapy in high-risk breast cancer: the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 1419-1426.
13. Wilder RB, Curcio LD, Khanijou RK, et al. Results with accelerated partial breast irradiation in terms of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human growth factor receptor 2 status. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78: 799-803.
14. Pashtan IM, Ancukiewicz M, Wo JY, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer is associated with higher risk of local recurrence after 3D-conformal external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (3D-CRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78 (3 suppl): S53 (abstract 112).
15. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13: 4429-4434.
16. Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, et al. The value of lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997; 38: 291-299.
17. Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Ruthazer R, et al. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 45: 885-891.
18. Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, Jeffrey SS,. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003; 57: 979-985.
19. Weigelt B, Baehner FL, Reis-Filho JS,. The contribution of gene expression profiling to breast cancer classification, prognostication and prediction: a retrospective of the last decade. J Pathol. 2010; 220: 263-380.
20. Bertucci F, Finetti P, Cervera N, et al. How basal are triple-negative breast cancers? Int J Cancer. 2008; 123: 236-240.
21. Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V,. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California Cancer Registry. Cancer. 2007; 109: 1721-1728.
22. Millikan RC, Newman B, Tse CK, et al. Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 109: 123-139.
23. Foulkes WD, Stefansson IM, Chappuis PO, et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95: 1482-1485.
24. Lakhani SR, Reis-Filho JS, Fulford L, et al. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Prediction of BRCA1 status in patients with breast cancer using estrogen receptor and basal phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11: 5175-5180.
25. Crabb SJ, Cheang MC, Leung S, et al. Basal breast cancer molecular subtype predicts for lower incidence of axillary lymph node metastases in primary breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2008; 8: 249-256.
26. Foulkes WD, Grainge MJ, Rakha EA, Green AR, Ellis IO,. Tumor size is an unreliable predictor of prognosis in basal-like breast cancers and does not correlate closely with lymph node status. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009; 117: 199-204.
27. Dent R, Hanna WM, Trudeau M, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA,. Pattern of metastatic spread in triple-negative breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009; 115: 423-428.
28. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 1275-1281.
29. Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans PM, et al. Impact of higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3259-3265.
30. Jones HA, Antonini N, Hart AA, et al. Impact of pathological characteristics on local relapse after breast-conserving therapy: a subgroup analysis of the EORTC boost versus no boost trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4939-4947.