Concept possession, experimental semantics, and hybrid theories of reference

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 717-742

  Genone, James ^a   Lombrozo, Tania ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Concepts; Experimental Philosophy; Semantics; Theories of Reference

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864679779     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: 1465394X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2011.627538     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Burge, T. 1979. Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 4: 73-121.
2. Deutsch, M. 2009. Experimental philosophy and the theory of reference. Mind & Language, 24: 445-466.
3. Devitt, M. 2011a. Experimental semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82: 418-435.
4. Devitt, M. 2011b. Deference and the use theory. Protosociology, 27: 196-211.
5. Devitt, M and Sterelny, K. 1999. Language and reality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Dickie, I. (2011). How proper names refer. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 111. 43-78
7. Evans, G. 1973. The causal theory of names. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 47: 187-208.
8. Evans, G. 1983. The varieties of reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Frege, G. (1948). On sense and reference (M. Black, Trans.). The Philosophical Review, 57, 207-230. (Original work published 1892.)
10. Hewson, C. (1994). Empirical evidence regarding the folk psychological concept of belief. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 403-406
11. Ichikawa, J, Maitra, I and Weatherson, B. 2011. In defense of a Kripkean dogma. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82: 418-435.
12. Jackman, H. 2009. Semantic intuitions, conceptual analysis, and cross-cultural variation. Philosophical Studies, 146: 159-177.
13. Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1972).
14. Laurence, S. & Margolis, E. (Eds.). (1999). Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
15. Ludwig, K. 2007. The epistemology of thought experiments: First-Person approach vs. third-person approach. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31: 128-159.
16. Machery, E. 2009. Doing without concepts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Machery, E. 2011. Thought experiments and philosophical knowledge. Metaphilosophy, 42: 191-214.
18. Machery, E, Mallon, R, Nichols, S and Stich, S. 2004. Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition, 92: B1-B12.
19. Machery, E, Olivola, C and De Blanc, M. 2009. Linguistic and metalinguistic intuitions in the philosophy of language. Analysis, 69: 689-694.
20. Machery, E. & Seppälä, S. (unpublished manuscript). Against hybrid theories of concepts
21. Machery, E. & Stich, S. (forthcoming). Experimental philosophy of language. In G. Russell and D.G. Fara (Eds.) Routledge companion to the philosophy of language. Abingdon: Routledge
22. Mallon, R, Machery, E, Nichols, S and Stich, S. 2009. Against arguments from reference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79: 332-356.
23. Marti, G. 2009. Against semantic multi-culturalism. Analysis, 69: 42-48.
24. Putnam, H. 1975. The meaning of "meaning.". In In his Mind, language, and reality: Philosophical papers, 215-271. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Searle, J. 1958. Proper names. Mind, 67: 166-173.
26. Soames, S. 2005. Reference and description, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. Sytsma, J and Livengood, J. 2011. A new perspective concerning experiments on semanitic intuitions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89: 315-332.