Visual reconstructability as a quality metric for flow visualization

Computer Graphics Forum

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 781-790

  Jänicke, Heike ^a   Weidner, Thomas ^b   Chung, David ^c   Laramee, Robert S ^c   Townsend, Peter ^c   Chen, Min ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVOLUTION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; VECTORS; VISUALIZATION;

2D FLOW VISUALIZATION; COST-EFFECTIVE MEANS; LINE INTEGRAL CONVOLUTION; QUALITY METRICES; RECONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS; VECTOR FIELDS; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS; VISUALIZATION RESULTS;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84864668461     PISSN: 01677055     EISSN: 14678659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01927.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BRODLIE K., BROOKE J., CHEN M., CHISNALL D., FEWINGS A., HUGHES C., JOHN N., JONES M., RIDING M., ROARD N.: Visual supercomputing-technologies, applications and challenges. Comp. Graph. Forum 24, 4 (2005), 217-245. 1
2. BERTINI E., SANTUCCI G.: Visual quality metrics. In BELIV '06: Proceedings of the 2006 AVI workshop on Beyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization (2006), ACM. 2
3. CANNY J.: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 8, 6 (1986), 679-698. 3
4. CHEN Y., COHEN J., KROLIK J.: Similarity-guided streamline placement with error evaluation. IEEE TVCG (2007), 1448-1455. 2
5. CGAL, Computational Geometry Algorithms Library, last accessed 03/2010. http://www.cgal.org. 6
6. CABRAL B., LEEDOM L. C.: Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution. In SIGGRAPH '93 (1993), ACM, pp. 263-270. 4
7. CUI Q., YANG J., WARD M., RUNDENSTEINER E.: Measuring data abstraction quality in multiresolution visualizations. IEEE TVCG 12, 5 (2006), 709-716. 1, 2, 3
8. DE BERG M., CHEONG O., VAN KREVELD M., OVERMARS M.: Computational Geometry. Springer, 2008. 6
9. DUDA R. O., HART P. E.: Use of the hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Comm. ACM 15 (1972), 11-15. 3, 5
10. FILONIK D., BAUR D.: Measuring aesthetics for information visualization. In IV '09: Proc. of the Conf. Info. Vis. (Washington, DC, USA, 2009), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 579-584. 1, 2
11. FORSBERG A., CHEN J., LAIDLAW D.: Comparing 3d vector field visualization methods: A user study. IEEE TVCG 15 (2009), 1219-1226. 2
12. JÄHNE B.: Digital Image Processing. Springer, 2002. 3, 5
13. JÄNICKE H., CHEN M.: A salience-based quality metric for visualization. Computer Graphics Forum (2010), Accepted for Eurographics/IEEE Symposium on Visualization. 1, 2, 3
14. JOSHI A., RHEINGANS P.: Evaluation of illustrationinspired techniques for time-varying data visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 27, 3 (2008), 999-1006. 2
15. KOSARA R., HEALEY C. G., INTERRANTE V., LAIDLAW D. H., WARE C.: User studies: Why, how, and when? IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 23, 4 (2003), 20-25. 2
16. KADYROV A., PETROU M.: Reverse engineering the human vision system: A possible explanation for the role of microsaccades. Pattern Recognition, International Conference on 4 (2004), 64-67. 6
17. LAIDLAW D. H., DAVIDSON J. S., MILLER T. S., DA SILVA M., KIRBY R. M., WARREN W. H., TARR M.: Quantitative comparative evaluation of 2d vector field visualization methods. In VIS '01: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '01 (Washington, DC, USA, 2001), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 143-150. 2
18. LAIDLAW D. H., KIRBY R. M., JACKSON C. D., DAVIDSON J. S., MILLER T. S., DA SILVA M., WARREN W. H., TARR M. J.: Comparing 2d vector field visualization methods: A user study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11, 1 (2005), 59-70. 2, 9
19. MARR D., HILDRETH E.: Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 207, 1167 (1980), 187-217. 2
20. NYMAN G., LAURINEN P.: Reconstruction of spatial information in the human visual system. Nature 297 (1982), 324-325. 6
21. OPENFOAM: Open cfd ltd., openfoam (open source cfd toolbox), last accessed 03/2010. http://www.openfoam.com/. 4
22. PALMER S.: Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999. 3, 5
23. PAGENDARM H.-G., POST F. H.: Studies in comparative visualization of flow features. In Scientific Visualization, Overviews, Methodologies, and Techniques (1997), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 211-227. 2
24. PÉREZ RISQUET C.: Visualisierung und RAijckrechnung von zwei-dimensionalen Vektordaten. PhD thesis, Rostock University, 2002. 2
25. POST F. H., VROLIJK B., HAUSER H., LARAMEE R. S., DOLEISCH H.: Feature Extraction and Visualization of Flow Fields. In Eurographics 2002 State-of-the-Art Reports (2002), pp. 69-100. 4
26. PINEO D., WARE C.: Neural modeling of flow rendering effectiveness. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 7 (June 2008), 20:1-20:15. 2
27. SHEN H.-W., KAO D. L.: A new line integral convolution algorithm for visualizing time-varying flow fields. IEEE TVCG 4 (1998), 98-108. 4
28. SHEN Q., PANG A., USELTON S.: Data level comparison of wind tunnel and computational fluid dynamics data. In VIS '98: Proc. of the conf. on Vis. (1998), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 415-418. 2, 3
29. SHAPIRO L., STOCKMAN G.: Computer Vision. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2001. 5
30. SAHASRABUDHE N., WEST J. E., MACHIRAJU R., JANUS M.: Structured spatial domain image and data comparison metrics. In VIS '99: Proc. of the conf. on Vis. (Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1999), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 97-104. 2, 3
31. VERMA V., PANG A.: Comparative flow visualization. IEEE TVCG 10, 6 (2004), 609-624. 2, 3
32. VAN WIJK J.: The value of visualization. In Proc. IEEE Visualization 2005 (2005), pp. 79-86. 2
33. WARE C.: 3d contour perception for flow visualization. In Applied Perception on Graphics and Visualization (APGV) (2006), ACM, pp. 101-106. 2
34. XU L., LEE T.-Y., SHEN H.-W.: An informationtheoretic framework for flow visualization. IEEE TVCG 16, 6 (2010), 1216-1224. 1
35. ZHOU H., CHEN M., WEBSTER M. F.: Comparative evaluation of visualization and experimental results using image comparison metrics. In VIS '02: Proc. of the conf. on Vis. (2002), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 315-322. 2, 3