3D contour perception for flow visualization

Proceedings - APGV 2006: Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 101-106

  Ware, Colin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Depth cues; Flow visualization; Stereo viewing

Indexed keywords

CURVED CONTOURS; MOTION DEPTH CUES; STEREO VIEWING;

DATA VISUALIZATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; IMAGE QUALITY; PIXELS; SPECIAL EFFECTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

FLOW VISUALIZATION;

EID: 34250784983     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1140491.1140512     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. CABRAL, B. AND LEEDOM, C. 1993. Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, '93, 27, 263-272.
2. CAMPBELL, F.W. AND GREEN, D.G. 1965. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity. Nature 209:191-192.
3. FRISBY, J.P., BUCKLEY, D., AND DUKE, P.A. 1996. Evidence for recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing. Perception, 25, 129-154.
4. GEIBEN, M., RUMPF, M. 1993. Visualization of finite elements and tools for numerical analysis. In Advances in Scientific Visualization. F.H. Post and AJS Hin (eds) Springer Verlag.
5. HOWARD, I.P. AND ROGERS, B.J. 1995. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. Oxford Psychology Series No 29. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
6. HULTQUIST, J.P.M. 1992. Constructing Stream Surfaces in Steady 3D Vector Fields. Proceedings of Visualization ' 92. 171-198
7. INTERRANTE, V., AND GROSCH, C. 1998. Visualizing 3D flow. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 18(4):49-53.
8. LAIDLAW, D.H. KIRBY, R.M., DAVIDSON, J.S., MILLER, T.S. DASILVA, M., WARREN, W.H. AND TARR, M. (2001) Quantitative comparative evaluation of 2D vector visualization methods. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization '01, October.
9. LARAMEE, R.S., WEISKOPF, D., SCHNEIDER, J., AND HAUSER, H. 2004 Investigating swirl and tumble with a comparison of visualization techniques. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization (Vis 2004), 51-58, October 15-19, Austin,
10. VAN EE, R., AND SCHOR, C.M. 2000. Unconstrained stereoscopic matching of lines. Vision Research, 40, 151-162.
11. NORMAN, J.F. TODD, J.T. PEROTTI, V.I AND TITTLE, J.S. 1996. The visual perception of 3-D length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22, 173-186.
12. REZK-SALAMA, C. HASTREITER, P., TEITZEL, C., AND ERTL, T. 1999 Interactive exploration of volume line integral convolution based on 3D texture mapping. Proceedings IEEE Visualization '99, 233-240.
13. ROGERS, B. AND CAGENELLO, R. 1989. Disparity curvatures and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Nature 339: 137-139.
14. SOLLENBERGER, R.L., AND MILGRAM, P. 1993. The effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in a three dimensional path tracing task. Human Factors, 35(3) 483-500.
15. SCHROEDER, W., VOLPE, C.R. AND LORENSEN, W.E. 1991. The stream polygon: a technique of 3D vector field visualization. Proceedings IEEE Visualization '99, 126-132.
16. TYLER, C. 1975. Spatial organization of binocular disparity sensitivity. Vision Research 15, 583-590.
17. UUMORI, K. AND NISHIDA, S. 1994. The dynamics of the visual system in combining conflicting KDE and binocular stereopsis cues. Perception and Psychophysics, 55(5), 526-536.
18. WALLACH, H. 1959. The perception of motion. Scientific American. July, 56-60.
19. WARE, C. AND FRANCK, G. 1996. Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 15(2) 121-140.
20. WHEATSTONE, C. 1838. Contributions to the physiology of vision. Pert the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 128, 371-394.
21. ZOCKLER, M., STALLING, D., AND HEGE, H.C. 1996. Interactive Visualization of 3D Vector fields using illuminated streamlines. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization '96 San Francisco. 107-113.