Scale-dependent drivers of ungulate patch use along a temporal and spatial gradient of snow depth

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 90, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 972-983

  Witt, J C ^a,b   Webster, C R ^a   Froese, R E ^a   Drummer, T D ^a   Vucetich, J A ^a  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis); FRAGSTATS; Generalized linear model; Habitat selection; Upper Peninsula of Michigan; White tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus); Winter cover

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL VARIATION; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; CLIMATE EFFECT; CONIFEROUS FOREST; DEER; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT SELECTION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MIGRATORY BEHAVIOR; MOVEMENT; PATCH USE; REFUGIUM; REGENERATION; SNOW ACCUMULATION; SNOW COVER; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

MICHIGAN; UNITED STATES; UPPER PENINSULA;

EID: 84864659014     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: 14803283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/Z2012-065     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Alverson, W.S., Waller, D.M., and Solheim, S.L. 1988. Forests too deer: edge effects in northern Wisconsin. Conserv. Biol. 2(4): 348-358. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00199.x.
2. Anderson, R.C., and Katz, A.J. 1993. Recovery of browse-sensitive tree species following release from white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus Zimmerman browsing pressure. Biol. Conserv. 63(3): 203-208. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90713-B.
3. Anderson, R.C., and Loucks, O.L. 1979. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) influence on structure and composition of Tsuga canadensis forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 16(3): 855-861. doi:10.2307/ 2402859.
4. Bates, D., and Sarkar, D. 2006. Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.995-2 3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
5. Beier, P., and McCullough, D.R. 1990. Factors influencing whitetailed deer activity patterns and habitat use. Wildl. Monogr. 109: 3-51.
6. Bender, D.J., and Fahrig, L. 2005. Matrix structure obscures the relationship between interpatch movement and patch size and isolation. Ecology, 86(4): 1023-1033. doi:10.1890/03-0769.
7. Blouch, R.I. 1984. Northern Great Lakes states and Ontario forests. In White-tailed deer ecology and management. Edited by L.K. Halls. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pa. pp. 391-410.
8. Boyce, M.S., Mao, J.S., Merrill, E.H., Fortin, D., Turner, M.G., Fryxell, J., and Turchin, P. 2003. Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park. Écoscience, 10: 421-431.
9. Bradford, D.F., Neale, A.C., Nash, M.S., Sada, D.W., and Jaeger, J.R. 2003. Habitat patch occupancy by toads (Bufo punctatus) in a naturally fragmented desert landscape. Ecology, 84(4): 1012-1023. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1012:HPOBTB]2.0.CO;2.
10. Burnham, K., and Anderson, D. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
11. Côté, S.D., Rooney, T.P., Tremblay, J.P., Dussault, C., and Waller, D.M. 2004. Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35(1): 113-147. doi:10.1146/annurev. ecolsys.35.021103.105725.
12. Creel, S., Winnie, J., Jr., Maxwell, B., Hamlin, K., and Creel, M. 2005. Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. Ecology, 86(12): 3387-3397. doi:10.1890/05-0032.
13. Dahlberg, B.L., and Guettinger, R.C. 1956. The white-tailed deer in Wisconsin. Game Management Division, Wisconsin Conservation Department, Madison.
14. Doepker, R.V., Beyer, D.E., and Donovan, M.L. 1994. Deer population trends in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Division, Lansing.
15. Drolet, C.A. 1976. Distribution and movements of white-tailed deer in southern New Brunswick in relation to environmental factors. Can. Field-Nat. 90: 123-136.
16. Dussault, C., Ouellet, J.-P., Courtois, R., Huot, J., Breton, L., and Jolicoeur, H. 2005. Linking moose habitat selection to limiting factors. Ecography, 28(5): 619-628. doi:10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04263.x.
17. Eichenlaub, V.L. 1970. Lake effect snowfall to the lee of the Great Lakes: its role in Michigan. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 51(5): 403-412. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1970)051<0403:LESTTL>2.0.CO;2.
18. Euler, D., and Thurston, L. 1980. Characteristics of hemlock stands related to deer use in east-central Ontario. J. Appl. Ecol. 17(1): 1-6. doi:10.2307/2402958.
19. Fancy, S.G., and White, R.G. 1985. Energy expenditures by caribou while cratering in snow. J. Wildl. Manage. 49(4): 987-993. doi:10. 2307/3801384.
20. Frelich, L.E., and Lorimer, C.G. 1985. Current and predicted longterm effects of deer browsing in hemlock forests in Michigan, USA. Biol. Conserv. 34(2): 99-120. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(85) 90103-X.
21. Guisan, A., and Zimmermann, N.E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135(2-3): 147-186. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9.
22. Gustafson, E.J., and Gardner, R.H. 1996. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology, 77(1): 94-107. doi:10.2307/2265659.
23. Holmes, S.A., and Webster, C.R. 2011. Herbivore-induced expansion of generalist species as a driver of homogenization in postdisturbance plant communities. Plant Ecol. 212(5): 753-768. doi:10.1007/s11258-010-9858-y.
24. Hurley, P.M., Webster, C.R., Flaspohler, D.J., and Parker, G.R. 2012. Untangling the landscape of deer overabundance: reserve size vs. landscape context in the agricultural Midwest. Biol. Conserv. 146(1): 62-71. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.034.
25. Jensen, N.R., Webster, C.R., Witt, J.C., and Grant, J.B. 2011. Ungulate winter habitat selection as a driver of herbaceous-layer heterogeneity in northern temperate forests. Ecosphere, 2: art67. doi:10.1890/ES10-00189.1.
26. Johnson, D.H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61(1): 65-71. doi:10.2307/1937156.
27. Johnson, C.J., Parker, K.L., Heard, D.C., and Gillingham, M.P. 2002. Movement parameters of ungulates and scale-specific responses to the environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 71(2): 225-235. doi:10.1046/j. 1365-2656.2002.00595.x.
28. Jones, P.F., and Hudson, R.J. 2002. Winter habitat selection at three spatial scales by American elk, Cervus elaphus, in west-central Alberta. Can. Field-Nat. 116: 183-191.
29. Kie, J.G., Bowyer, R.T., Nicholson, M.C., Boroski, B.B., and Loft, E.R. 2002. Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deer. Ecology, 83(2): 530-544. doi:10. 1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0530:LHADSE]2.0.CO;2.
30. Kirchhoff, M.D., and Schoen, J.W. 1987. Forest cover and snow: implications for deer habitat in southeast Alaska. J. Wildl. Manage. 51(1): 28-33. doi:10.2307/3801623.
31. Kittle, A.M., Fryxell, J.M., Desy, G.E., and Hamr, J. 2008. The scaledependent impact of wolf predation risk on resource selection by three sympatric ungulates. Oecologia (Berl.), 157(1): 163-175. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1051-9. PMID:18481095.
32. Lang, B.K., and Gates, J.E. 1985. Selection of sites for winter night beds by white-tailed deer in a hemlock-northern hardwood forest. Am. Midl. Nat. 113(2): 245-255. doi:10.2307/2425570.
33. Maissurow, D.K. 1941. The role of fire in the perpetuation of virgin forests of northern Wisconsin. J. For. 39: 201-207.
34. Mayor, S., Schaefer, J., Schneider, D., and Mahoney, S. 2007. Spectrum of selection: new approaches to detecting the scaledependent response to habitat. Ecology, 88(7): 1634-1640. doi:10. 1890/06-1672.1. PMID:17645009.
35. Mayor, S.J., Schneider, D.C., Schaefer, J.A., and Mahoney, S.P. 2009. Habitat selection at multiple scales. Écoscience, 16(2): 238-247. doi:10.2980/16-2-3238.
36. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A., Neel, M.C., and Ene, E. 2002. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
37. McShea, W.J., Underwood, H.B., and Rappole, J.H. 1997. The science of overabundance: deer ecology and population management. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
38. Michigan Department of Natural Resources. 2001. IFMAP/GAP Upper Peninsula Land Cover data with 30-m resolution. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing.
39. Millington, J.D.A., Walters, M.B., Matonis, M.S., and Liu, J. 2010. Effects of local and regional landscape characteristics on wildlife distribution across managed forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 259(6): 1102-1110. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.12.020.
40. Mladenoff, D.J., and Stearns, F. 1993. Eastern hemlock regeneration and deer browsing in the northern Great Lakes region: a reexamination and model simulation. Conserv. Biol. 7(4): 889-900. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740889.x.
41. Morrison, S.F., Forbes, G.J., Young, S.J., and Lusk, S. 2003. Withinyard habitat use by white-tailed deer at varying winter severity. For. Ecol. Manage. 172(2-3): 173-182. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127 (01)00809-X. National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center (NOHRSC). 2004. Snow Data Assimilation System (SNODAS) data products at NSIDC. National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, Colo.
42. Nelson, M.E. 1995. Winter range arrival and depature of white-tailed deer in northeastern Minnesota. Can. J. Zool. 73(6): 1069-1076. doi:10.1139/z95-127.
43. Nelson, M.E. 1998. Development of migratory behavior in northern white-tailed deer. Can. J. Zool. 76(3): 426-432. doi:10.1139/z97-207.
44. Nelson, M.E., and Mech, L.D. 1981. Deer social organization and wolf predation in northeastern Minnesota. Wildl. Monogr. 77: 3-53.
45. Nelson, M.E., and Mech, L.D. 1991. Wolf predation risk associated with white-tailed deer movements. Can. J. Zool. 69(10): 2696-2699. doi:10.1139/z91-379.
46. Nelson, M.E., and Mech, L.D. 2006. A 3-decade dearth of deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in a wolf (Canis lupus)-dominated ecosystem. Am. Midl. Nat. 155(2): 373-382. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2006)155[373:ADDODO]2.0.CO;2.
47. Nordengren, C., Hofgaard, A., and Ball, J.P. 2003. Availability and quality of herbivore winter browse in relation to tree height and snow depth. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 40: 305-314.
48. O'Brien, D., Manseau, M., Fall, A., and Fortin, M.J. 2006. Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: an application of graph theory. Biol. Conserv. 130(1): 70-83. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.014.
49. Olden, J.D., Schooley, R.L., Monroe, J.B., and Poff, N.L. 2004. Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes. Ecology, 73: 1190-1194.
50. Parker, K.L., Robbins, C.T., and Hanley, T.A. 1984. Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk. J. Wildl. Manage. 48(2): 474-488. doi:10.2307/3801180.
51. Pearson, S.M., Turner, M.G., Wallace, L.L., and Romme, W.H. 1995. Winter habitat use by large ungulates following fire in northern Yellowstone National Park. Ecol. Appl. 5(3): 744-755. doi:10. 2307/1941982.
52. Potvin, M.J., Drummer, T.D., Vucetich, J.A., Beyer, D.E., Jr., Peterson, R.O., and Hammill, J.H. 2005. Monitoring and habitat analysis for wolves in Upper Michigan. J. Wildl. Manage. 69(4): 1660-1669. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1660:MAHAFW]2. 0.CO;2.
53. Rettie, W.J., and Messier, F. 2000. Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors. Ecography, 23(4): 466-478. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00303.x.
54. Ricketts, T.H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat. 158(1): 87-99. doi:10.1086/ 320863. PMID:18707317.
55. Riitters, K., O'Neill, R., Hunsaker, C., Wickham, D., Yankee, D., Timmins, S., Jones, K., and Jackson, B. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landsc. Ecol. 10(1): 23-39. doi:10.1007/BF00158551.
56. Rooney, T.P. 2001. Deer impacts on forest ecosystems: a North American perspective. Forestry, 74(3): 201-208. doi:10.1093/ forestry/74.3.201.
57. Rooney, T.P. 2009. High white-tailed deer densities benefit graminoids and contribute to biotic homogenization of forest ground-layer vegetation. Plant Ecol. 202(1): 103-111. doi:10. 1007/s11258-008-9489-8.
58. Rooney, T.P., and Waller, D.M. 1998. Local and regional variation in hemlock seedling establishment in forests of the upper Great Lakes region, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 111(2-3): 211-224. doi:10.1016/ S0378-1127(98)00333-8.
59. Rooney, T.P., McCormick, R.J., Solheim, S.L., andWaller, D.M. 2000. Regional variation in recruitment of hemlock seedlings and saplings in the Upper Great Lakes, USA. Ecol. Appl. 10(4): 1119-1132. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1119:RVIROH]2.0.CO;2.
60. Russell, F.L., Zippin, D.B., and Fowler, N.L. 2001. Effects of whitetailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on plants, plant populations and communities: a review. Am. Midl. Nat. 146(1): 1-26. doi:10. 1674/0003-0031(2001)146[0001:EOWTDO]2.0.CO;2.
61. Rutherford, A.C., and Schmitz, O.J. 2010. Regional-scale assessment of deer impacts on vegetation within western Connecticut, USA. J. Wildl. Manage. 74: 1257-1263.
62. Sabine, D.L., Morrison, S.F., Whitlaw, H.A., Ballard, W.B., Forbes, G.J., and Bowman, J. 2002. Migration behavior of white-tailed deer under varying winter climate regimes in New Brunswick. J. Wildl. Manage. 66(3): 718-728. doi:10.2307/3803137.
63. Salk, T.T., Frelich, L.E., Sugita, S., Calcote, R., Ferrari, J.B., and Montgomery, R.A. 2011. Poor recruitment is changing the structure and species composition of an old-growth hemlock-hardwood forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 261(11): 1998-2006. doi:10. 1016/j.foreco.2011.02.026.
64. Schabenberger, O., and Pierce, F. 2002. Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
65. Senft, R.L., Coughenour, M.B., Bailey, D.W., Rittenhouse, L.R., Sala, O.E., and Swift, D.M. 1987. Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience, 37(11): 789-799. doi:10.2307/ 1310545.
66. Stottlemyer, R., and Toczydlowski, D. 1991. Stream chemistry and hydrologic pathways during snowmelt in a small watershed adjacent Lake Superior. Biogeochemistry, 13(3): 177-197. doi:10.1007/BF00002941.
67. Telfer, E.S. 1970. Winter habitat selection by moose and white-tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manage. 34(3): 553-559. doi:10.2307/3798862.
68. Tierson, W., Mattfeld, G., Sage, R., and Behrend, D. 1985. Seasonal movements and home ranges of white-tailed deer in theAdirondacks. J. Wildl. Manage. 49(3): 760-769. doi:10.2307/3801708.
69. Turner, M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20(1): 171-197. doi:10.1146/ annurev.es.20.110189.001131.
70. Turner, M., Pearson, S., Romme, W., and Wallace, L. 1997. Landscape heterogeneity and ungulate dynamics: what spatial scales are important? In Wildlife and landscape ecology: effects of pattern and scale. Edited by J. Bissonette. Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 331-348.
71. US Geological Survey. 1998. 1998 Series USGS digital orthophoto quadrangles. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Forestry, Mineral and Fire Management Division, Resource Mapping and Aerial Photography, Lansing.
72. Van Deelen, T.R., Campa, H., III, Hamady, M., and Haufler, J.B. 1998. Migration and seasonal range dynamics of deer using adjacent deeryards in northern Michigan. J. Wildl. Manage. 62(1): 205-213. doi:10.2307/3802280.
73. Verme, L.J. 1973. Movements of white-tailed deer in upper Michigan. J. Wildl. Manage. 37(4): 545-552. doi:10.2307/3800320.
74. Waller, D.M., and Alverson, W.S. 1997. The white-tailed deer: a keystone herbivore. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25: 217-226.
75. Webster, C.R., Rock, J.H., Froese, R.E., and Jenkins, M.A. 2008. Drought-herbivory interaction disrupts competitive displacement of native plants by Microstegium vimineum, 10-year results. Oecologia (Berl.), 157(3): 497-508. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1085-z. PMID:18584209.
76. Whitney, G.G. 1987. An ecological history of the Great Lakes forest of Michigan. J. Ecol. 75(3): 667-684. doi:10.2307/2260198.
77. Wiens, J.A. 1976. Population responses to patchy environments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7(1): 81-120. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.07. 110176.000501.
78. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 1998. WISCLAND land cover (WLCGW930). Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.
79. Witt, J.C. 2010. Patch selection by wintering white-tailed deer: consequences for eastern hemlock regeneration at local and landscape scales. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton.
80. Witt, J.C., and Webster, C.R. 2010. Regeneration dynamics in remnant Tsuga canadensis stands in the northern Lake States: potential direct and indirect effects of herbivory. For. Ecol. Manage. 260(4): 519-525. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.05.007.
81. Woolf, A., Nielsen, C., Weber, T., and Gibbs-Kieninger, T. 2002. Statewide modeling of bobcat, Lynx rufus, habitat in Illinois. Biol. Conserv. 104(2): 191-198. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00164-1.
82. Xie, J., Hill, H.R., Winterstein, S.R., Campa, H., III, Doepker, R.V., Van Deelen, T.R., and Liu, J. 1999. White-tailed deer management options model (DeerMOM): design, quantification, and application. Ecol. Model. 124(2-3): 121-130. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800 (99)00157-X.
83. Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Walker, N., Smith, G.M., and Saveliev, A.A. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York.