Modeling environmental impacts of urban expansion: A systematic method for dealing with uncertainties

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 8236-8243

  Liu, Yi ^a   Yang, Sheng ^a   Chen, Jining ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRIVING FORCES; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE; INDUSTRIAL LAND; INDUSTRIAL WATER; INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; LAND-USE PLANNING; NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; SPATIAL PATTERNS; SPATIAL SAMPLING; STOCHASTIC SAMPLING; SYSTEMATIC METHOD; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN EXPANSION; URBAN LAND USE; URBAN LAND-USE CHANGE;

CELLULAR AUTOMATA; ECONOMICS; LAND USE; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; URBAN GROWTH; WATER POLLUTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; LAND USE PLANNING; RAILWAY; ROAD; STOCHASTICITY; TEMPORAL PERIOD; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; URBANIZATION;

ARTICLE; CHINA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOMESTIC WASTE; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INDUSTRIALIZATION; LAND USE; SOCIAL ASPECT; STOCHASTIC MODEL; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION; WATER POLLUTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; UNCERTAINTY; URBANIZATION;

CHINA; DALIAN; LIAONING;

EID: 84864650437     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es300766a     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aspinall, R. Modelling land use change with generalized linear models̄a multi-model analysis of change between 1860 and 2000 in Gallatin Valley, Montana J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 72 (1-2) 91-103
2. Ligtenberg, A.; Wachowicz, M.; Bregt, A. K.; Beulens, A.; Kettenis, D. L. A design and application of a multi-agent system for simulation of multi-actor spatial planning J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 72 (1-2) 43-55
3. Klosterman, R. E. The what if? collaborative planning support system Environ. Plann. B 1999, 26, 393-408
4. Kakaraparthi, S. K.; Kockelman, K. M. Application of UrbanSim to the Austin, Texas, Region: Integrated-Model Forecasts for the Year 2030 J. Urban Plann. Dev. 2011, 137 (3) 238-247
5. Esbah, H. Land use trends during rapid urbanization of the City of Aydin, Turkey Environ. Manage. 2007, 39 (4) 443-459
6. Fox, J.; Rindfuss, R. R.; Walsh, S. J.; Mishra, V. People and the environment: Approaches for Linking Household and Community Surveys to Remote Sensing and GIS; Kluwer: Boston, 2002.
7. Verburg, P. H.; Veldkamp, A.; Willemen, L.; Overmars, K. P.; Castella, J. C. Landscape level analysis of the spatial and temporal complexity of land-use change. In Ecosystems and Land Use Change; De Vries, R.; Houghton, R., Eds.; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, 2004.
8. Batty, M.; Xie, Y.; Sun, Z. Modelling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 1999, 23 (3) 205-233
9. Clarke, K. C.; Hoppen, S.; Gaydos, L. J. A self-modifying cellular automata model of historical urbanization in the San Franciso Bay area Environ. Plann. B 1997, 24, 247-261
10. Braimoh, A. K.; Onishi, T. Spatial determinants of urban land use change in Lagos, Nigeria Land Use Policy 2007, 24 (2) 502-515
11. Liu, Y.; Phinn, S. R. Modelling urban development with cellular automata incorporating fuzzy-set approaches Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2003, 27 (6) 637-658
12. Veldkamp, A.; Verburg, P. H. Modelling land use change and environmental impact J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 72 (1-2) 1-3
13. Kok, K. The role of population in understanding Honduran land use patterns J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 72 (1-2) 73-89
14. Chen, J.; Avise, J.; Guenther, A.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Salathe, E.; Jackson, R. B.; Lamb, B. Future land use and land cover influences on regional biogenic emissions and air quality in the United States Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43 (36) 5771-5780
15. Mukerjee, S.; Smith, L. A.; Johnson, M. M.; Neas, L. M.; Stallings, C. A. Spatial analysis and land use regression of VOCs and NO2 from school-based urban air monitoring in Detroit/Dearborn, USA Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407 (16) 4642-4651
16. Zhao, N.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J. Regional industrial production's spatial distribution and water pollution control:A plant-level aggregation method for the case of a small region in China Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407 (17) 4946-4953
17. Polebitski, A.; Palmer, R. Impacts of climate change and growth on water demands in the Puget Sound Region. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change, Providence, RI, United States, 2010.
18. Zorn, M.; Petan, S. Interrill soil erosion on flysch soil under different types of land use in Slovenian Istria. In 24th Conference of the Danubian Countries on the Hydrological Forecasting and Hydrological Bases of Water Management, Bled, Slovenia, 2008.
19. Gu, S. The study on the relationship between land use and soil erosion in the Hengduan mountainous region of the Eastern Tibet. In 2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering, Nanjing, China, 2011.
20. Xie, D.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J. Mapping Urban environmental noise: A land use regression method Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (17) 7358-7364
21. de Koning, G. H. J.; Benítez, P. C.; Muñoz, F.; Olschewski, R. Modelling the impacts of payments for biodiversity conservation on regional land-use patterns Landscape Urban Plann. 2007, 83 (4) 255-267
22. Trisurat, Y.; Alkemade, R.; Verburg, P. H. Projecting land-use change and its consequences for biodiversity in northern thailand Environ. Manage. 2010, 45 (3) 626-639
23. Polasky, S.; Nelson, E.; Pennington, D.; Johnson, K. A. The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: A case study in the state of Minnesota Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011, 48 (2) 219-242
24. Corburn, J. Urban land use, air toxics and public health: Assessing hazardous exposures at the neighborhood scale Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2007, 27 (2) 145-160
25. Alonso, D.; Solé, R. V. The DivGame simulator: A stochastic cellular automata model of rainforest dynamics Ecol. Modell. 2000, 133 (1-2) 131-141
26. Pinto, N. N.; Antnes, A. P. Cellular automata and urban studies: a literature survey Archit. City Environ. 2007, 1 (3) 368-399
27. Li, X.; Yeh, A. G. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 2002, 16 (4) 323-343
28. M, T. P.; Sullivan, D. O. Cellular automata and urban simulation: Where do we go from here? Environ. Plann. B 2001, 28, 163-168
29. van Vliet, J.; Bregt, A. K.; Hagen-Zanker, A. Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models Ecol. Modell. 2011, 222 (8) 1367-1375
30. Kim, J. O.; Yu, K.; Heo, J.; Lee, W. H. A new method for matching objects in two different geospatial datasets based on the geographic context Comput. Geosci. 2010, 36 (9) 1115-1122
31. Melchers, R. E.; Ahammed, M. A fast approximate method for parameter sensitivity estimation in Monte Carlo structural reliability Comput. Struct. 2004, 82 (1) 55-61
32. Kuczeraa, G.; Parent, E. Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm J. Hydrol. 1998, 211 (1-4) 69-85
33. Wyss, G. D.; Jorgensen, K. H. In A User's Guide to LHS: Sandia's Latin Hypercube Sampling Software, Sandia; Sandia National Laboratories: 1998.
34. Owen, A. B. Latin supercube sampling for very high-dimensional simulation ACM Trans. Model Comput. Simul. 1998, 8 (1) 71-102
35. Wu, H. Integrated Environmental Assessment Methodology and Case Study based on Urban Land Use Simulation. Master Thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2008.
36. Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; He, W.; Tong, Q.; Li, W. Application of an Uncertainty Analysis Approach to Strategic Environmental Assessment for Urban Planning Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (8) 3136-3141
37. Yan, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Wu, H. The Impact of Road Transportation system on regional industrial distribution Econ. Geogr. 2009, 29 (5) 746-751
38. Young, P. C.; Hornberger, G. M.; Spear, R. C. Modeling badly defined systems-some further thoughts. In Proceedings SIMSIG Simulation Conference; Australian National University: Canberra, Australia, 1978; pp 24-32.
39. Hornberger, G. M.; Spear, R. C. Eutrophication in Peel Inlets I. The problem-defining behavior and a mathematical model for the phosphorus scenario Water Res. 1980, 14, 29-42
40. Spear, R. C.; Hornberger, G. M. Eutrophication in Peel Inlet II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis Water Res. 1980, 14, 43-49
41. Beck, M. B. Water quality modeling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty Water Resour. Res. 1987, 23 (8) 1393-1442
42. Liu, Y.; Li, T.; Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, W.; Tong, Q.; Lv, C. Ecologically feasible space for urban development: A methodology and case study on Dalian Municipality, Northeastern China China Environ. Sci. 2007, 27 (1) 34-38
43. Oreskes, N.; Shrader-Frechette, K.; Belitz, K. Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences Science 1994, 263 (5147) 641-646
44. Rockafellar, R. T.; Wets, R. J. B. Scenario and policy aggregation in optimization under uncertainty Math. Oper. Res. 1991, 16 (1) 119-147
45. Christensen, K. S. Coping with Uncertainty in Planning J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 1985, 51 (1) 63-73
46. Beck, M. B. Environmental Foresight and Models: A Manifesto; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2002.
47. Ménard, A.; Marceau, D. J. Exploration of spatial scale sensitivity in geographic cellular automata Environ. Plann. B 2005, 32 (5) 693-714
48. Kocabas, V.; Dragicevic, S. Assessing cellular automata model behavior using a sensitivity analysis approach Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2006, 30 (6) 921-953