Maximum Likelihood Dynamic Factor Modeling for Arbitrary N and T Using SEM

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 329-350

  Voelkle, Manuel C ^a   Oud, Johan H L ^b   von Oertzen, Timo ^a   Lindenberger, Ulman ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

dynamic factor analysis; factorial invariance; maximum likelihood estimation; time series analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864647300     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2012.687656     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson, T. W. 1963. The use of factor analysis in the statistical analysis of multiple time series. Psychometrika, 28: 1-25. doi:10.1007/BF02289543
2. Boker, S. M., Neale, M. C., Maes, H. H. and Wilde, M. 2010. OpenMx Retrieved fromhttp://openmx.psyc.virginia.edu/
3. Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
4. Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., Molenaar, P. C. M. and Lindenberger, U. 2010. Adult age differences in covariation of motivation and working memory performance: Contrasting between-person and within-person findings. Research in Human Development, 7: 61-78. doi:10.1080/15427600903578177
5. Brose, A., Voelkle, M. C., Lövdén, M., Lindenberger, U. and Schmiedek, F. Positive and negative affect: Between-person associations do not generalize to the individual (submitted)
6. Browne, M. W. and Nesselroade, J. R. 2005. "Representing psychological processes with dynamic factor models: Some promising uses and extensions of autoregressive moving average time series models.". In Contemporary psychometrics, Edited by: Maydeu, A. and McArdle, J. J. 415-452. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Cattell, R. B. 1963. "The structuring of change by P-technique and incremental R-technique.". In Problems in measuring change, Edited by: Harris, C. W. 167-198. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
8. Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K. S. and Rhymer, R. M. 1947. P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysical source traits in a normal individual. Psychometrika, 12: 267-288. doi:10.1007/BF02288941
9. Chow, S. M., Ho, M.-h., Hamaker, E. L. and Dolan, C. V. 2010. Equivalence and differences between structural equation modeling and state-space modeling techniques. Structural Equation Modeling, 17: 303-332. doi:10.1080/10705511003661553
10. Dolan, C. V. 2010. MKFM6: Multi-group, multi-subject stationary time series modeling based on the Kalman filter Retrieved fromhttp://users.fmg.uva.nl/cdolan/
11. Durbin, J. and Koopman, S. J. 2001. Time series analysis by state space methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Engle, R. and Watson, M. 1981. A one-factor multivariate time series model of metropolitan wage rates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76: 774-781.
13. Geweke, J. F. and Singleton, K. J. 1981. Maximum likelihood "confirmatory" factor analysis of economic time series. International Economic Review, 22: 37-54.
14. Gill, P. E., Murray, W., Saunders, M. A. and Wright, M. H. 1998. User's guide for NPSOL 5.0: A Fortran package for nonlinear programming Stanford, CA: Systems Optimization Laboratory, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University. (Technical Report No. SOL 86-2)
15. Hamaker, E. L., Dolan, C. V. and Molenaar, P. C. M. 2002. On the nature of SEM estimates of ARMA parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 9: 347-368.
16. Hamaker, E. L., Dolan, C. V. and Molenaar, P. C. M. 2003. ARMA-based SEM when the number of time points T exceeds the number of cases N: Raw data maximum likelihood. Structural Equation Modeling, 10: 352-379.
17. Hershberger, S. L., Molenaar, P. C. M. and Corneal, S. E. 1996. "A hierarchy of univariate and multivariate structural times series models.". In Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques, Edited by: Marcoulides, G. A. and Schumacker, R. E. 159-194. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Jones, C. J. and Nesselroade, J. R. 1990. Multivariate, replicated, single-subject, repeated measures designs and p-technique factor analysis: A review of intraindividual change studies. Experimental Aging Research: An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process, 16: 171-183. doi:10.1080/03610739008253874
19. Jöreskog, K. G. 1973. "A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system.". In Structural equation models in the social sciences, Edited by: Goldberger, A. S. and Duncan, O. D. 85-112. New York, NY: Seminar Press.
20. Lange, K., Westlake, J. and Spence, M. A. 1976. Extensions to pedigree analysis III. Variance components by the scoring method. Annals of Human Genetics, 39: 485-491. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1976.tb00156.x
21. Luborsky, L. and Mintz, J. 1972. "The contribution of P-technique to personality, psychotherapy, and psychosomatic research.". In Multivariate personality research, Edited by: Dreger, R. M. 387-410. Baton Rouge, LA: Claitor's.
22. McArdle, J. J. 2005. "The development of RAM rules for latent variable structural equation modeling.". In Contemporary advances in psychometrics, Edited by: Maydeu-Olivares, A. and McArdle, J. J. 225-273. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. McArdle, J. J. and McDonald, R. P. 1984. Some algebraic properties of the Reticular Action Model for moment structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37: 234-251.
24. Molenaar, P. C. M. 1985. A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 50: 181-202. doi:10.1007/BF02294246
25. Molenaar, P. C. M. 2004. A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2: 201-218.
26. Molenaar, P. C. M. and Campbell, C. G. 2009. The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychology, 18: 112-117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x
27. Molenaar, P. C. M. and Nesselroade, J. R. 1998. A comparison of pseudo-maximum likelihood and asymptotically distribution-free dynamic factor analysis parameter estimation in fitting covariance-structure models to block-Toeplitz matrices representing single-subject multivariate time-series. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33: 313-342.
28. Molenaar, P. C. M. and Nesselroade, J. R. 2009. The recoverability of P-technique factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44: 130-141. doi:10.1080/00273170802620204
29. Muthén, B. 2002. Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29: 81-117. doi:10.2333/bhmk.29.81
30. Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G. and Maes, H. H. 2003. Mx: Statistical modeling. Richmond, VA: Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University.
31. Nesselroade, J. R. 2007. "Factoring at the individual level: Some matters for the second century of factor analysis.". In Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions, Edited by: Cudeck, R. and MacCallum, R. C. 249-264. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Nesselroade, J. R. and Ford, D. H. 1985a. P-technique comes of age: Multivariate, replicated single-subject designs for research on older adults. Research on Aging, 7: 46-80. doi:10.1177/0164027585007001003
33. Nesselroade, J. R. and Ford, D. H. 1985b. Single-subject designs for research on older adults P-technique comes of age: Multivariate, replicated. Research on Aging, 7: 46-80.
34. Nesselroade, J. R., McArdle, J. J., Aggen, S. H. and Meyers, J. M. 2002. "Dynamic factor analysis models for representing process in multivariate time-series.". In Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: Methods and applications, Edited by: Moskowitz, D. S. and Hershberger, S. L. 235-265. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Nesselroade, J. R. and Molenaar, P. C. M. 1999. "Pooling lagged covariance structures based on short, multivariate time series for dynamic factor analysis.". In Statistical strategies for small sample research, Edited by: Hoyle, R. H. 223-250. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Nesselroade, J. R. and Molenaar, P. C. M. 2004. "Applying dynamic factor analysis in behavioral and social science research.". In Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences, Edited by: Kaplan, D. 335-344. London, UK: Sage.
37. Oud, J. H. L. 2004. "SEM state space modeling of panel data in discrete and continuous time and its relationship to traditional state space modeling.". In Recent developments on structural equations models: Theory and applications, Edited by: van Montfort, K., Oud, J. H. L. and Satorra, A. 13-40. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
38. Oud, J. H. L. and Jansen, R. A. R. G. 2000. Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of SEM. Psychometrika, 65: 199-215. doi:10.1007/BF02294374
39. Oud, J. H. L. and Singer, H. 2008. Continuous time modeling of panel data: SEM versus filter techniques. Statistica Neerlandica, 62: 4-28.
40. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
41. Schmiedek, F., Lövden, M. and Lindenberger, U. 2010. Hundred days of cognitive training enhance broad cognitive abilities in adulthood: Findings from the COGITO study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2: 4-10. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2010.00027
42. Singer, H. 2010. SEM modeling with singular moment matrices part I: ML-estimation of time series. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 34: 301-320. doi:10.1080/0022250X.2010.509524
43. van Buuren, S. 1997. Fitting ARMA time series by structural equation models. Psychometrika, 62: 215-236.
44. Wright, S. 1920. The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guineas pigs. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 6: 320-332.
45. Zhang, Z. 2006. The R function to simulate data for the direct autoregressive factor score model Retrieved fromhttp://www.psychstat.org/us/article.php/67.htm
46. Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E. L. and Nesselroade, J. R. 2008. Comparisons of four methods for estimating a dynamic factor model. Structural Equation Modeling, 15: 377-402.