Climate change and voltinism in Californian insect pest species: Sensitivity to location, scenario and climate model choice

Global Change Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2771-2780

  Ziter, Carly ^a   Robinson, Emily A ^a   Newman, Jonathan A ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agricultural pests; Climate change; Degree days; Global warming; Voltinism

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; CLIMATE MODELING; GLOBAL WARMING; INSECT; PEST SPECIES; VOLTINISM;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

HEXAPODA;

EID: 84864621791     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: 13652486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02748.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bader D, Covey C, Gutowski W et al. (2008) Climate models: an assessment of strengths and limitations. In: A report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Washington, D.C. USA, 124 pp.
2. Bale JS, Masters GJ, Hodkinson ID, et al. (2002) Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Global Change Biology, 8, 1-16.
3. Beasley C, Adams C (1996) Field-based, degree-day model for pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) development. Journal of Economic Entomology, 89, 881-890.
4. Beaumont LJ, Hughes L (2002) Potential changes in the distributions of latitudinally restricted Australian butterfly species in response to climate change. Global Change Biology, 8, 954-971.
5. Beaumont LJ, Pitman A, Poulsen M, Hughes L (2007) Where will species go? Incorporating new advances in climate modelling into projections of species distributions. Global Change Biology, 13, 1368-1385.
6. Beaumont LJ, Hughes L, Pitman A (2008) Why is the choice of future climate scenarios for species distribution modelling important? Ecology Letters, 11, 1135-1146.
7. Bettiga LJ, Kido H, Mccalley NF (1992) Orange tortrix. In: Grape Pest Management. Agr. Sci. Publ. #4105. (eds Flaherty DL, Christensen LP, Lanini WT, Marois JJ, Phillips PA, Wilson LT) pp. 174-179. University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
8. Bimboni HG (1970) The relation of variation in temperature to the rate of development of immature stages of California red scale [Aonidiella aurantii [Mask]] on citrus. University of California, Riverside, 112 pp.
9. Buisson L, Thuiller W, Casajus N, Lek S, Grenouillet G (2010) Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution. Global Change Biology, 16, 1145-1157.
10. Buytaert W, Cèlleri R, Timbe L (2009) Predicting climate change impacts on water resources in the tropical Andes: effects of GCM uncertainty. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L07406.
11. Carroll C, Dunk JR, Moilanen A (2010) Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multispecies conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Global Change Biology, 16, 891-904.
12. Croft B, Michels M, Rice R (1980) Validation of a PETE timing model for the oriental fruit moth in Michigan and central California (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Great Lakes Entomologist, 13, 211-217.
13. Dahlsten D, Tait S, Rowney D, Gingg B (1993) A monitoring system and development of ecologically sound treatments for elm leaf beetle. Journal of Arboriculture, 19, 181-181.
14. Gregory PJ, Johnson SN, Newton AC, Ingram JSI (2009) Integrating pests and pathogens into the climate change/food security debate. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60, 2827.
15. Harrison P, Berry P, Butt N, New M (2006) Modelling climate change impacts on species' distributions at the European scale: implications for conservation policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 9, 116-128.
16. Hartstack AWJ, Hollingsworth JP, Ridgeway RL, Lopez DJ (1976) MOTHZV-2: A Computer Simulation of Heliothis zea and virescens Population Dynamics. User manual. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Region, 127, 55 pp.
17. Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90, 1095-1107.
18. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field CB, et al. (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 12422-12427.
19. Hogg DB, Gutierrez A (1980) A model of the flight phenology of the beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in central California. Hilgardia, 48, 1-35.
20. Hoover JK, Newman JA (2004) Tritrophic interactions in the context of climate change: a model of grasses, cereal Aphids and their parasitoids. Global Change Biology, 10, 1197-1208.
21. Jönsson AM, Appelberg G, Harding S, Bärring L (2009) Spatio temporal impact of climate change on the activity and voltinism of the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. Global Change Biology, 15, 486-499.
22. Kido H, Flaherty DL, Barnett WW, Andris HL (1981) Omnivorous leafroller. In: Grape Pest Management. Agr. Sci. Publ. #4105. (eds Flaherty DL, Jensen FL, Kasimatis AN, Kido H, Moller WJ), pp. 126-136. University of Caifornia, Cavis, CA.
23. Knutti R (2010) The end of model democracy? Climatic Change, 102, 1-10.
24. Kriticos DJ, Alexander NS, Kolomeitz SM (2009) Predicting the potential geographic distribution of weeds in 2080. In: 15th Australian Weeds Conference: Managing Weeds in a Changing Climate (eds Preston C, Watts JH, Crossman ND), pp. 27-34. Weed Management Society of South Australia, Torrens Park.
25. Luedeling E, Steinmann KP, Zhang M, Brown PH, Grant J, Girvetz EH (2011) Climate change effects on walnut pests in California. Global Change Biology, 17, 228-238.
26. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD et al. (2007) Global climate projections. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (eds Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL), pp. 748-845. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, NY.
27. Mika AM, Newman JA (2010) Climate change scenarios and models yield conflicting predictions about the future risk of an invasive species in North America. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 12, 213-221.
28. Mika AM, Weiss RM, Olfert O, Hallett RH, Newman JA (2008) Will climate change be beneficial or detrimental to the invasive swede midge in North America? Contrasting predictions using climate projections from different general circulation models. Global Change Biology, 14, 1721-1733.
29. Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G et al. (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.
30. 2 and temperature on aphid population dynamics. Global Change Biology, 10, 5-15.
31. Newman JA (2005) Climate change and the fate of cereal aphids in Southern Britain. Global Change Biology, 11, 940-944.
32. Newman JA (2006) Using the output from global circulation models to predict changes in the distribution and abundance of cereal aphids in Canada: a mechanistic modeling approach. Global Change Biology, 12, 1634-1642.
33. 2? Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 556-566.
34. Newman JA, Anand M, Henry HaL, Hunt S, Gedalof Z (2011) Climate Change Biology. CABI, Wallingford, CT, USA.
35. Ohlendorf B (1999) Integrated Management for Apples and Pears. University of California, Davis, CA.
36. Olfert O, Weiss R, Kriticos D (2011) Application of general circulation models to assess the potential impact of climate change on potential distribution and relative abundance of melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius)(Orthoptera: Acrididae) in north America. Psyche: A Journal of Entomology, 2011, Article ID 980372.
37. Parker WS (2006) Understanding pluralism in climate modeling. Foundations of Science, 11, 349-368.
38. Pickel C, Welch NC, Walsh DB (1990) Timing Lygus Sprays Using Degree-Days in Central Coast Strawberries. Agricultural Extension Publication, Santa Cruz, CA.
39. Quiggin J (2008) Uncertainty and climate change policy. Economic Analysis & Policy, 38, 203-210.
40. Randall D, Wood R, Bony S et al. (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL), pp. 590-662. Cambridge Univesity Press, Cambridge, UK and New York.
41. Rice RE, Zalom FG, Brunner JF (1982a) Monitoring Peach Twig Borer Development with Degree-Days. Div. Agr. Pub. #21302. University of California, Davis, CA.
42. Rice RE, Zalom FG, Jorgensen C (1982b) Monitoring San Jose Scale development with degree-days. California Agricultural Sciences Leaflet #21312. University of California, Davis, CA.
43. 2 on plant-arthropod interactions highlights the importance of interacting environmental and biological variables. New Phytologist, 194, 321-336.
44. Sanderson J, Barnes M, Seaman W (1989) Synthesis and validation of a degree-day model for navel orange worm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) development in California almond orchards. Environmental Entomology, 18, 612-617.
45. Scriber JM (2010) Integrating ancient patterns and current dynamics of insect-plant interactions: taxonomic and geographic variation in herbivore specialization. Insect Science, 17, 471-507.
46. Thuiller W (2004) Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change. Global Change Biology, 10, 2020-2027.