A meta-analytical review of the effects of elevated CO 2 on plant-arthropod interactions highlights the importance of interacting environmental and biological variables

New Phytologist

Volumn 194, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 321-336

  Robinson, Emily A ^a   Ryan, Geraldine D ^a   Newman, Jonathan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide (CO 2); Climate change; Global warming; Insect plant interactions; Meta analysis; Plant defences; Plant animal interactions; Review

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ADAPTATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; DROUGHT STRESS; GLOBAL WARMING; GROWTH RESPONSE; LIGHT AVAILABILITY; LITERATURE REVIEW; METABOLITE; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; SOIL NITROGEN; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; DRUG EFFECT; ENVIRONMENT; HERBIVORY; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; META ANALYSIS; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENVIRONMENT; HERBIVORY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; PLANTS;

ANIMALIA; ARTHROPODA; HEXAPODA;

EID: 84858750330     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04074.x     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Altman DG, Bland JM. 2003. Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. British Medical Jounal 326: 219.
2. Asseng S. 2004. Wheat crop systems: a simulation analysis. Collingwood, Victoria, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
3. Awmack CS, Leather SR. 2002. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47: 817-844.
4. 2 levels. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 167-196.
5. Bernays EA, Chapman RF. 1994. Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. New York, NY, USA: Chapman and Hall.
6. 2: quantitative analyses and guild effects. Oikos 82: 212-222.
7. Bidart-Bouzat MG, Imeh-Nathaniel A. 2008. Global change effects on plant chemical defenses against insect herbivores. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 50: 1339-1354.
8. 2 influences herbivory-induced defense responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Oecologia 145: 415-424.
9. Bland M, Peacock J. 2002. Interpreting statistics with confidence. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 4: 176-180.
10. 2. Annual Review of Plant Biology 44: 309-332.
11. 2. Global Change Biology 4: 63-75.
12. Bryant JP, Chapin FS III, Klein DR. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40: 357-368.
13. Choong M, Lucas P, Ong J, Pereira B, Tan H, Turner I. 1992. Leaf fracture toughness and sclerophylly: their correlations and ecological implications. New Phytologist 121: 597-610.
14. 2 reduces the nitrogen concentration of plant tissues. Global Change Biology 4: 43-54.
15. Coviella CE, Trumble JT. 1999. Effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on insect-plant interactions. Conservation Biology 13: 700-712.
16. 2 atmospheres on plant-insect herbivore interactions: growth responses of larvae of the specialist butterfly, Junonia coenia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Oecologia 81: 514-520.
17. Farrar J, Williams M. 1991. The effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide and temperature on carbon partitioning, source-sink relations and respiration. Plant, Cell & Environment 14: 819-830.
18. Glass G. 1999. Meta-analysis at 25. Washington DC, USA: Office of Special Education Programs Research Project Directors' Conference, 1999.
19. Kopper B, Lindroth R. 2003b. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone on the phytochemistry of aspen and performance of an herbivore. Oecologia 134: 95-103.
20. Koricheva J, Larsson S, Haukioja E. 1998. Insect performance on experimentally stressed woody plants: a meta-analysis. Annual Review of Entomology 43: 195-216.
21. 2 atmospheres on the nutritional quality of Eucalyptus foliage and its interaction with soil nutrient and light availability. Oecologia 109: 59-68.
22. 2 environments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8: 64-68.
23. 3 on forests: phytochemistry, trophic interactions, and ecosystem dynamics. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36: 2-21.
24. Marks S, Lincoln DE. 1996. Antiherbivore defense mutualism under elevated carbon dioxide levels: a fungal endophyte and grass. Environmental Entomology 25: 618-623.
25. 2 concentrations on cell division rates, growth patterns, and blade anatomy in young wheat plants are modulated by factors related to leaf position, vernalization, and genotype. Plant Physiology 122: 1399.
26. Massey FP, Ennos AR, Hartley SE. 2006. Silica in grasses as a defence against insect herbivores: contrasting effects on folivores and a phloem feeder. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 595-603.
27. Mattson WJ. 1980. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 119-161.
28. 2, nitrogen and fungal endophyte-infection on tall fescue: growth, photosynthesis, chemical composition and digestibility. Global Change Biology 9: 425-437.
29. Newman JA, Anand A, Henry HAL, Hunt S, Gedalof Z. 2011. Climate change biology. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
30. Newman JA, Gibson DJ, Hickam E, Lorenz M, Adams E, Bybee L, Thompson R. 1999. Elevated carbon dioxide results in smaller populations of the bird cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. Ecological Entomology 24: 486-489.
31. 2 concentration. Vegetatio 104/105: 77-97.
32. 2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytologist 157: 175-198.
33. 2 and plant structure: a review. Global Change Biology 5: 807-837.
34. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J. 2000. MetaWin: statistical software for meta-analysis. Version 2, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
35. Rosenthal R. 1979. The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological bulletin 86: 638-641.
36. 2-mediated changes in paper birch and white pine chemistry on gypsy moth performance. Oecologia 98: 133-138.
37. Ryan GD, Rasmussen S, Newman JA. 2010. Global atmospheric change and trophic interactions: are there any general responses? In: Baluška F, Ninkovic V, eds. Plant communication from an ecological perspective. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 179-214.
38. 2) affect plant-herbivore interactions? A field experiment and meta-analysis of CO2-mediated changes on plant chemistry and herbivore performance Global Change Biology 13: 1823-1842.
39. 2 lowers relative and absolute herbivore density across all species of a scrub-oak forest. Oecologia 134: 82-87.
40. 2: reduced leaf quality and increased parasitoid attack. Ecological Applications 9: 240-244.
41. Stitt M, Krapp A. 1999. The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: the physiological and molecular background. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 583-621.
42. 2 levels. Journal of Applied Entomology 133: 189-197.
43. 2, on tree leaf chemistry and insect herbivore performance: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology 13: 184-201.
44. Walters D. 2011. Plant defense: warding off attack by pathogens, herbivores and pathogenic plants. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
45. 2. Journal of Applied Entomology 130: 2-9.
46. Ziska LH, Bunce JA. 2006. Plant responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Morison JIL, Morecroft MD, eds. Plant growth and climate change. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 17-47.
47. Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV. 2006. Consequences of simultaneous elevation of carbon dioxide and temperature for plant-herbivore interactions: a metaanalysis. Global Change Biology 12: 27-41.