Progression of visual field defects in eyes with different optic disc appearances in patients with normal tension glaucoma

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 426-430

  Nakazawa, Toru ^a   Shimura, Masahiko ^b   Ryu, Morin ^a   Himori, Noriko ^a   Nitta, Fumihiko ^a   Omodaka, Kazuko ^a   Doi, Hiroshi ^a   Yasui, Tomoki ^c   Fuse, Nobuo ^a   Nishida, Kohji ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b NTT East Tohoku Hospital   (Japan)

^c Yasui Eye Clinic   (Japan)

Author keywords

myopia; normal tension glaucoma; optic disc type; visual fields

Indexed keywords

ANTIGLAUCOMA AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LOW TENSION GLAUCOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; TOPICAL TREATMENT; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

AGED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LOW TENSION GLAUCOMA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84864607647     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182182897     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1641-1648.
2. The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension Glaucoma Collaborative normaltension glaucoma study group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126 498-505
3. Nicolela MT, SM Drance. Various glaucomatous optic nerve appearances clinical correlations. Ophthalmology 1996;103: 640-649.
4. Nicolela MT, McCormick TA, Drance SM, et al. Visual field and optic disc progression in patients with different types of optic disc damage A longitudinal prospective study. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2178-2184.
5. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. Mosby; 1999.
6. Nakazawa T, Fuse N, Omodaka K, et al. Different types of optic disc shape on the patients with the advanced stage of open angle Glaucoma Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010. (In press).
7. Omodaka K, Nakazawa T, Otomo T, et al. Correlation between morphology of optic disc determined by heidelberg retina tomograph II and visual function in eyes with open angle Glaucoma Clin Ophthalmol. 2010. (In press).
8. Sawada A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, et al. Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population: The Tajimi study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:363-370. e363.
9. Kempen JH, Mitchell P, Lee KE, et al. The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:495-505.
10. Sperduto RD, Seigel D, Roberts J, et al. Prevalence of myopia in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:405-407.
11. Jonas JB, Berenshtein E, Holbach L. Lamina cribrosa thickness and spatial relationships between intraocular space and cerebrospinal fluid space in highly myopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2660-2665.
12. Mitchell P, Hourihan F, Sandbach J, et al. The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2010-2015.
13. Suzuki Y, Iwase A, Araie M, et al. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma in a Japanese population: The Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1613-1617.
14. Xu L, Wang Y, Wang S, et al. High myopia and glaucoma susceptibility the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2007;114: 216-220.
15. Broadway DC, Nicolela MT, Drance SM. Optic disk appearances in primary open-angle Glaucoma Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;43(Suppl 1):S223-S243.