On the hyperdeterminant for 2 × 2 × 3 arrays

Linear and Multilinear Algebra

Volumn 60, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 921-932

  Bremner, Murray R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

hyperdeterminant; invariant theory; multidimensional arrays; multilinear algebra; representation theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864591087     PISSN: 03081087     EISSN: 15635139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03081087.2011.634412     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cayley, A. 1845. On the theory of linear transformations. Cambridge Math. J., 4: 193-209. Available atwww.archive.org/details/collectedmathema01cayluoft
2. de Graaf, WA. 2000. Lie Algebras: Theory and Algorithms, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
3. de Silva, V and Lim, L-H. 2008. Tensor rank and the ill-posedness of the best low-rank approximation problem. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 30: 1084-1127.
4. Erdmann, K and Wildon, MJ. 2006. Introduction to Lie Algebras, London: Springer-Verlag.
5. Gelfand, IM, Kapranov, MM and Zelevinsky, AV. 1992. Hyperdeterminants. Adv. Math., 96: 226-263.
6. Humphreys, JE. 1972. Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, New York: Springer.
7. Jacobson, N. 1962. Lie Algebras, New York: Interscience Publishers.
8. Kolda, TG and Bader, BW. 2009. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Rev., 51: 455-500.
9. Kruskal, JB. 1977. Three-way arrays: Rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions, with application to arithmetic complexity and statistics. Linear Algebra Appl., 18: 95-138.
10. Martin, CD. 2011. The rank of a 2 × 2 × 2 tensor. Linear Multilinear Algebra, 59: 943-950.
11. Stegeman, A and Comon, P. 2010. Subtracting a best rank-1 approximation may increase tensor rank. Linear Algebra Appl., 433: 1276-1300.
12. Stillwell, J. 2008. Naive Lie Theory, New York: Springer.
13. ten Berge, JMF. 1991. Kruskal's polynomial for 2 × 2 × 2 arrays and a generalization to 2 × n × n arrays. Psychometrika, 56: 631-636.