Consistency of Patient Preferences About a Secure Internet-Based Patient Communications Portal: Contemplating, Enrolling, and Using

American Journal of Medical Quality

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 494-502

  Wakefield, Douglas S ^a   Kruse, Robin L ^a   Wakefield, Bonnie J ^a,b   Koopman, Richelle J ^a   Keplinger, Lynn E ^a   Canfield, Shannon M ^a   Mehr, David R ^a  

^a Center for Health Care Quality   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

asynchronous communications; patient portal; quality of care; secure Internet communications

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864570769     PISSN: 10628606     EISSN: 1555824X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1062860611436246     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Zhou YY,Garrido T,Chin HL,Wiesenthal AM,Liang LL.Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: impact on primary care utilization.Am J Manag Care. 2007;13:418-424.
2. McGeady D,Kujala J,Ilvonen K.The impact of patient-physician web messaging on healthcare service provision.Int J Med Inform. 2008;77:17-23.
3. Virji A,Yarnall SH,Karuse KM, et al.Use of email in a family practice setting: opportunities and challenges in patient- and physician-initiated communication.BMC Med. 2006;4:18.
4. Klein R.An empirical examination of patient-physician portal acceptance.Eur J Inf Syst. 2007;16:751-760.
5. Silvestre AL,Sue VM,Allen JY.If you build it, will they come? The Kaiser Permante model of online health care.Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:334-344.
6. EmontS. Measuring the impact of patient portals: what the literature tells us. http://www.chcf.org/publications/2011/05/measuring-impact-patient-portals. Accessed August 10, 2011.
7. Molyneaux H,O'Donnell S,Oakley P, et alPatient Portal Technologies. Fredericton, NB, Canada: National Research Council; 2009:.
8. Wallwiener M,Wallwiener CW,Kansy JK,Seeger H,Rajab TK.Impact of electronic messaging on the patient-physician interaction.J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15:243-250.
9. Bryne JM,Elliott S,Firek A.Initial experience with patient-clinician secure messaging at a VA medical center.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:267-270.
10. Lin CT,Wittevrongel L,Moore L,Beaty BL,Ross SE.An Internet-based patient-provider communication system: randomized controlled trial.J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e47.
11. Hess R,Bryce CL,Paone S, et al.Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: implementation and initial assessment.Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:509-517.
12. Kleiner KD,Akers R,Burke BL,Werner EJ.Parent and physician attitudes regarding electronic communications in pediatric practices.Pediatrics. 2002;109:740-744.
13. Denton IC.Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience.J Healthc Inf Manage. 2001;15:251-259.
14. Couchman GR,Forjuoh SN,Rascoe TG,Reis MD,Koehler K,Walsum KL.E-mail communications in primary care: what are patients' expectations for specific test results?.Int J Med Inform. 2005;74:21-30.
15. Sittig DF,King S,Hazlehurst BL.A survey of patient-provider e-mail communication: what do patients think?.Int J Med Inform. 2001;61:71-80.
16. Couchman GR,Forjuoh SN,Rascoe TG.E-mail communication in family practice: what do patients expect?.J Fam Pract. 2001;50:414-418.
17. Katz SJ,Moyer CA,Cox DT,Stern DT.Effect of a triage-based e-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care.J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:736-744.
18. Bergman DA,Brown NL,Wilson S.Teen use of a patient portal: a qualitative study of parent and teen attitudes.Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2008;5:13.
19. Atreja A,Mehta N,Miller D, et al.One size does not fit all: using qualitative methods to inform the development of an Internet portal for multiple sclerosis patients.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:16-20.
20. Bryce CL,Zickmund S,Hess R, et al.Value versus user fees: perspectives of patients before and after using a web-based portal of management of diabetes.Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:1035-1043.
21. Earnest MA,Ross SE,Wittevrongel L,Lin C.Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences.J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2004;11:410-417.
22. Winkelman WJ,Leonard KJ,Rossos PG.Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness.J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2005;12:306-314.
23. Shaw E,Howard M,Chan D, et al.Access to Web-based personalized antenatal health records for pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:38-43.
24. Matheny ME,Gandhi TK,Orav EJ, et al.Impact of an automated test results management system on patients' satisfaction about test result communication.Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2233-2239.
25. Aldas-Manzano J,Lassala-Navarre C,Ruiz-Mafe C,Sans-Blas S.Key drivers of Internet banking services use.Online Inf Rev. 2009;33:672-695.
26. Laukkanen P,Sinkkonen S,Laukkanen T.Consumer resistance to Internet banking: postponers, opponents, and rejectors.Int J Bank Manag. 2008;26:440-455.
27. Lichtenstein S,Williamson K.Understanding consumer adoption of Internet banking: an interpretative study in the Australian banking context.J Electron Commerce Res. 2006;7 (2): 50-66.