The comparison of cardiovascular risk scores using two methods of substituting missing risk factor data in patient medical records

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 225-232

  Dalton, Andrew R H ^a,b   Bottle, Alex ^a   Soljak, Michael ^a   Okoro, Cyprian ^a,b   Majeed, Azeem ^a   Millett, Christopher ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NHS Ealing Primary Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular disease; Electronic health records; Health inequalities; Primary prevention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

BODY MASS INDEX; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COMORBIDITY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84864562171     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v19i4.817     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease. Department of Health: London, 2000.
2. Department of Health. Putting Prevention First, Vascular Checks; risk assessment and management. Department of Health: London, 2008.
3. Chamnan P, Simmons RK, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ and Griffin SJ. Estimating the population impact of screening strategies for identifying and treating people at high risk of cardiovascular disease: modelling study. BMJ 2010;340:c1693.
4. Lawson KD, Fenwick EAL, Pell ACH and Pell JP. Comparison of mass and targeted screening strategies for cardiovascular risk: simulation of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and coverage using a cross-sectional survey of 3921 people. Heart 2010;96 (3):208-12.
5. Dalton ARH, Bottle A, Okoro C, MajeedAand Millett C. Implementation of the NHS Health Checks programme: baseline assessment of risk factor recording in an urban culturally diverse setting. Family Practice 2011;28 (1):34-40.
6. Majeed A, Car J and Sheikh A. Accuracy and completeness of electronic patient records in primary care. Family Practice 2008;25 (4):213-14.
7. Oberoi. Clinical Observations. Oberoi Consulting: Derby, UK, 2007.
8. Janssen KJ, Donders AR, Harrell FE Jr et al. Missing covariate data in medical research: to impute is better than to ignore. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010; 63 (7):721-7.
9. Clark TG and Altman DG. Developing a prognostic model in the presence of missing data: an ovarian cancer case study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2003;56 (1): 28-37. (Pubitemid 36183312)
10. Joint British Societies (JBS2). Joint British Societies' guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice. Heart 2005;91 (Suppl. 5):v1-52.
11. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Vinogradova Y et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2. BMJ 2008;336 (7659):1475-82. (Pubitemid 351977019)
12. Graham JW, Olchowski AE and Gilreath TD.Howmany imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science 2007;8 (3):206-13.
13. Dalton ARH, Soljak M, Samarasundera E, Millett C and Majeed A. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk amongst the population eligible for the NHS Health Check Programme. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation 2012. DOI: 10.1177/ 1741826711428797.
14. Cyr L and Francis K. Measures of clinical agreement for nominal and categorical data: the kappa coefficient. Computers in Biology and Medicine 1992;22 (4):239-46.
15. Marshall T. The use of cardiovascular risk factor information in practice databases: making the best of patient data. The British Journal of General Practice 2006; 56 (529):600-5. (Pubitemid 44209983)
16. DaltonARHand Bull RJ. Risk stratification could reduce costs in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. BMJ 2011;343:d4913.
17. Marshall T. Estimating the value of information in strategies for identifying patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Informatics in Primary Care 2006;14 (2): 85-92. (Pubitemid 44687599)
18. Marshall T. Targeted case finding for cardiovascular prevention. BMJ 2010;340:c1376.
19. Ekundayo OJ, Vassar SD, Williams LS, Bravata DM and Cheng EM. Using Administrative databases to calculate Framingham scores within a large health care organization. Stroke 2011;42 (7):1982-7.
20. Marshall T. Identification of patients for clinical risk assessment by prediction of cardiovascular risk using default risk factor values. BMC Public Health 2008;8:25.
21. Collins GS and Altman DG. An independent external validation and evaluation of QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction: a prospective open cohort study. BMJ 2009; 339:b2584.
22. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and the Modification of Blood Lipids for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease (CG67). NICE: London, 2008.
23. Department of Health. Economic Modelling for Vascular Checks. Department of Health: London, 2008.
24. Dalton ARH, Bottle A, Okoro C, MajeedAand Millett C. Uptake of the NHS Health Checks programme in a deprived, culturally diverse setting: cross-sectional study. Journal of Public Health 2011;33 (3):422-9.
25. Cooney MT, Dudina A, Whincup P et al. Re-evaluating the Rose approach: comparative benefits of the population and high-risk preventive strategies. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation 2009;16 (5): 541-9.
26. Batsis JA and Lopez-Jimenez F. Cardiovascular risk assessment - from individual risk prediction to estimation of global risk and change in risk in the population. BMC Medicine 2010;8 (1):29.