DNA sequence data reveal a subfamily-level divergence within Thamnophilidae (Aves: Passeriformes)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 287-293

  Bravo, Gustavo A ^a   Remsen, J V ^a   Whitney, Bret M ^a   Brumfield, Robb T ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antbirds; Antwrens; Avian systematics; New genus; New subfamily; Suboscines

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SONGBIRD; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PASSERIFORMES; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

AVES; PASSERI; PASSERIFORMES; TERENURA; TERENURA CALLINOTA; TERENURA HUMERALIS; TERENURA MACULATA; TERENURA SHARPEI; TERENURA SPODIOPTILA; THAMNOPHILIDAE; TYRANNI;

EID: 84864544374     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aleixo A., Burlamaqui T.C.T., Schneider M.P.C., Gonçalves E.C. Molecular systematics and plumage evolution in the monotypic obligate army-ant-following genus Skutchia (Thamnophilidae). Condor 2009, 111:382-387.
2. Ames P.L. The morphology of the syrinx in passerine birds. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. 1971, 114:1-32.
3. Baldwin, S.P., Oberholser, H.C.,Worley, L.G., 1931. Measurements of birds. Sci. Pub. Cleveland Mus. Nat. Hist.
4. Barker F.K., Barrowclough G.F., Groth J.G. A phylogenetic hypothesis for passerine birds: taxonomic and biogeographic implications of an analysis of nuclear DNA sequence data. Proc. Royal Soc. London B. Biol. Sci. 2002, 269:295-308.
5. Bledsoe A.H. Nuclear DNA evolution and phylogeny of the New World nine-primaried oscines. Auk 1988, 105:504-515.
6. Bravo G.A., Chesser R.T., Brumfield R.T. Isleria, a new genus of antwren (Aves: Passeriformes: Thamnophilidae). Zootaxa 2012, 3195:61-67.
7. Brumfield R.T., Edwards S.V. Evolution into and out of the Andes: a Bayesian analysis of historical diversification in Thamnophilus antshrikes. Evolution 2007, 61:346-367.
8. Brumfield R.T., Tello J.G., Cheviron Z.A., Carling M.D., Crochet N., Rosenberg K.V. Phylogenetic conservatism and antiquity of a tropical specialization: army-ant-following in the typical antbirds (Thamnophilidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 45:1-13.
9. Cabanis, J., Heine, F., 1859-1860. Verzeichniss der ornithologischen Sammlung des Oberamtmann Ferdinand Heine auf Gut St. Burchard vor Halberstadt. Mit krtischen Anmerkungen und Beschreinbung der neuen Arten systematisch bearbeitet. Museum Heineanum 2, pp. 1-175.
10. Cháves J.C., Cuervo A.M., Miller M.J., Cadena C.D. Revising species limits in a group of Myrmeciza antbirds reveals a cryptic species within M. laemosticta. Condor 2010, 112:718-730.
11. Cory C.B., Hellmayr C.E. Catalogue of birds of the Americas and the adjacent islands, Part III, Pteroptochidae-Conopophagidae-Formicariidae. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Zool. Ser. 1924, 13:1-369.
12. Derryberry E.P., Claramunt S., Derryberry G.D., Chesser R.T., Cracraft J., Aleixo A., Pérez-Emán J., Remsen J.V., Brumfield R.T. Lineage diversification and morphological evolution in a large-scale continental radiation: The Neotropical ovenbirds and woodcreepers (Aves: Furnariidae). Evolution 2011, 65:2973-2986.
13. Drummond, A.J., Ashton, B., Buxton, S., Cheung, M., Cooper, A., Duran, C., Field, M., Heled, J., Kearse, M., Markowitz, S., Moir, R., Stone-Havas, S., Sturrock, S., Thierer, T., Wilson, A., 2011. Geneious v5.4. http://www.geneious.com/.
14. Gómez J.P., Bravo G.A., Brumfield R.T., Tello J.G., Cadena C.D. A phylogenetic approach to disentangling the role of competition and habitat filtering in community assembly of Neotropical forest birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 2010, 79:1181-1192.
15. Groth J.G., Barrowclough G.F. Basal divergence in birds and phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1999, 12:115-123.
16. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
17. Irestedt M., Fjeldså J., Nylander J.A.A., Ericson P.G.P. Phylogenetic relationships of typical antbirds (Thamnophilidae) and test of incongruence based on Bayes factors. BMC Evol. Biol. 2004, 4:23.
18. Isler M.L., Lacerda D.R., Isler P.R., Hackett S.J., Rosenberg K.V., Brumfield R.T. Epinecrophylla, a new genus of antwrens (Aves: Passeriformes: Thamnophilidae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 2006, 119:522-527.
19. Isler, P.R., Whitney, B.M., 2002. Songs of the Antbirds. Thamnophilidae, Formicariidae, and Conopophagidae. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. Ithaca, NY.
20. Isler M.L., Whitney B.M. Species limits in the antbirds (Thamnophilidae): the scale-backed Antbird (Willisornis poecilonotus) complex. Wilson J. Ornithol. 2011, 123:1-14.
21. Jobling J.A. The Helm Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names 2010, Christopher Helm, London, 432 p.
22. Katoh K., Misawa K., Kuma K.I., Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucl. Acids Res. 2002, 30:3059-3066.
23. Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W., Schwartz, T., 2010. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computer Environments Workshop, New Orleans, LA, pp. 1-8.
24. Moyle R.G., Chesser R.T., Brumfield R.T., Tello J.G., Marchese D.J., Cracraft J. Phylogeny and phylogenetic classification of the antbirds, ovenbirds, woodcreepers, and allies (Aves: Passeriformes: Infraorder Furnariides). Cladistics 2009, 25:386-405.
25. Nylander, J.A.A., 2004. MrModeltest2 v2.3. Evolutionary Biology Center, Uppsala University. Uppsala, Sweden. http://www.abc.se/~nylander/.
26. Peters, J.L., 1951. Check-list of Birds of the World, vol. 7. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
27. Peterson A.T., Moyle R.G., Nyári A.S., Robbins M.B., Brumfield R.T., Remsen J.V. The need for proper vouchering in phylogenetic studies of birds. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 45:1042-1044.
28. Raposo do Amaral F., Sheldon F.H., Gamauf A., Haring E., Riesing M., Silveira L.F., Wajntal A. Patterns and processes of diversification in a widespread and ecologically diverse avian group, the buteonine hawks (Aves, Accipitridae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 53:703-715.
29. Ridgely R.S., Tudor G. The Birds of South America. The Suboscine Passerines (vol. II) 1994, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
30. Ridgway, R., 1911. The birds of North and Middle America. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 50.
31. Salvin O., Godman F.D. Biologia Centrali-Americana. Aves. vol. II 1904, Taylor and Francis, London, 598 p.
32. Sclater P.L. Descriptions of some new species of ant-thrushes (Formicariinae) from Santa Fé di Bogota. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1855, 23:88-90.
33. Sclater P.L. Synopsis of the American ant-birds (Formicariidae). Part II., Containing the Formicivorinae or antwrens. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1858, 26:232-271.
34. Sclater P.L. Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum 1890, vol. 15. British Museum of Natural History, London.
35. Sclater P.L., Salvin O. On new birds collected by Mr. C. Buckley in eastern Ecuador. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1880, 48:155-161.
36. Sclater P.L., Salvin O. Descriptions of some new species of South-American birds of the families Tyrannidae and Formicariidae. Ibis 1881, 23:267-271.
37. Seddon N. Ecological adaptation and species recognition drive vocal evolution in Neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 2005, 59:200-215.
38. Sibley C.G., Ahlquist J.E. Phylogeny and Classification of the Birds of the World 1990, Yale University Press, New Haven.
39. Snethlage E. Neue vogelarten aus nordbrasilien. J. Ornithol. 1925, 73:264-274.
40. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2688-2690.
41. Swofford, D.L. 2003, PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). v4. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland. http://paup.csit.fsu.edu/.
42. Taczanowski L., von Berlepsch C.H. Troisième liste des oiseaux recueillis par M. Stolzmann dans l'Ecuadeur. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1885, 53:67-124.
43. Texeira D.M., Gonzaga L.P. A new antwren from northeastern Brazil. Bull. Br. Ornithol. Club 1983, 103:133-135.
44. Tobias J.A., Seddon N. Signal design and perception in Hypocnemis antbirds: Evidence for convergent evolution via social selection. Evolution 2009, 63:3168-3189.
45. von Berlepsch C.H. Mitteilungen über die von den Gebrüdern G. und O. Garlepp in Bolivia gesammelten Vögel und Beschreibungen neuer Arten. J. Ornithol. 1901, 49:81-99.
46. Wied, M.P., 1831. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte von Brasilien (vol. 3). Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte von Brasilien. Weimar, pp. 637-1227.
47. Wilgenbusch, J.C., Warren, D.L., Swofford, D.L., 2004. AWTY: a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference. (10.0.11). http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty.
48. Zimmer K.J., Isler M.L. Family Thamnophilidae (Typical Antbirds). Broadbills to Tapaculos 2003, vol. 8:448-681. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. J. Del Hoyo, A. Elliott, D. Christie (Eds.).