Low-cost facility for assessing impact of carbon dioxide on crops

Current Science

Volumn 102, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1035-1040

  Chakrabarti, B ^a   Singh, S D ^a   Naresh Kumar, S ^a   Aggarwal, P K ^b   Pathak, H ^a   Nagarajan, S ^a  

^a INDIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b INTERNATIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide; Climate change; Crop productivity; Free air carbon dioxide enrichment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864526937     PISSN: 00113891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Paultikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J. and Hanon, C. E. (eds), IPCC, Climate change 2007. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Technical Summary of Working Group II to Fourth Assessment Report Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp. 23-78.
2. 2? Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 1997, 48, 609-639.
3. Rawson, H. M., Gifford, R. M. and Condon, B. N., Temperature gradient chambers for research on global environment change. I. Portable chambers for research on short-stature vegetation Canberra, Australia. Plant Cell Environ., 1995, 18, 1048-1054.
4. 2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ., 1999, 22, 683-714.
5. 2 concentration: a meta-analytic test of current theories and perceptions. Glob. Change Biol., 1999, 5, 723-741.
6. 2 concentration. J. Agric. Meteorol., 1993, 48, 559-566.
7. Morison, J. I. L., Sensitivity of stomata and water use efficiency to high CO. Plant Cell Environ., 1985, 8, 467-474.
8. Olszyk, D. M., Takemoto, B. K., Kats, G., Dawson, P. J., Morrison, C. L., Wolf Preston, J. and Thompson, C. R., Effects of open top chambers on 'Valencia' orange trees. J. Environ. Qual., 1992, 21, 128-134.
9. 2. New Phytol., 2005. 165, 351-372.
10. Mooi, I. J. and van der Zalm, A. J. A., Research on the effects of higher than ambient concentrations of SO2 and NO2 on vegetation under semi-natural conditions. The developing and testing of a field fumigation system; process description. First interim report to the Commission of the European Communities, EEC Contract ENV-677-NL, Research Institute for Plant Protection, 1985.
11. Greenwood, P., Greenhalgh, A., Baker, C. K. and Unsworth, M. H., A computer-controlled system for exposing field crops to gaseous air pollutants. Atmos. Environ., 1982, 39, 2166-2261.
12. McLeod, A. R., An open-air system for exposure of young forest trees to sulfur-dioxide and ozone. Plant Cell Environ., 1995, 18, 215-225.
13. 2. Biol. Plant., 2003, 46, 35-39.
14. 2 fumigation system. Glob. Change Biol., 1997, 3, 417-427.
15. Hendrey, G. R. and Kimball, B. A., The FACE program. Agric. For. Meteorol., 1994, 70, 3-14.
16. 2. Glob. Change Biol., 1999, 5, 293- 309.
17. 2 use in 1990 and 1991. Agric. For. Meteorol., 1994, 70, 31-48.
18. 2, warming and drought: the CLIMAITE project. Funct. Ecol., 2008, 22, 185-195.
19. 2. Case Studies, Processes and Perspectives (eds Noseberger, J. et al.), Springer, Berlin, 2006, pp. 15-46.
20. 2 uptake under free-air concentration enrichment (FACE). Glob. Change Biol., 2004, 10, 951-962.
21. 2 in a grassland ecosystem. Plant Physiol., 1996, 112, 575-583.