A survey on future internet architecture

Jisuanji Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Computers

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1109-1119

  Xie, Gao Gang ^a   Zhang, Yu Jun ^a   Li, Zhen Yu ^a   Sun, Yi ^a   Xie, Ying Ke ^a   Li, Zhong Cheng ^a   Liu, Yun Jie ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Architecture; Future Internet; Next generation Internet; Next generation network; Programmable virtual router; Testbed

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS; ROUTERS; SCALABILITY; TESTBEDS;

ESSENTIAL PROBLEMS; FUTURE INTERNET; FUTURE INTERNET ARCHITECTURE; HOT RESEARCH TOPICS; INTERNET ARCHITECTURE; NEXT GENERATION INTERNET; PROGRAMMABLE VIRTUAL ROUTERS; SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE;

NETWORK ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 84864505733     PISSN: 02544164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1016.2012.0l109     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Leiner B M, Cerf V G et al. A brief history of the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2009, 39(5): 22-31
2. Feldmann A. Internet clean-slate design: What and why?. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2007, 37(3): 59-64
3. Handley M. Why the Internet only just works. BT Technology Journal, 2006, 24(3): 119-129
4. Rexford J, Dovrolis C. Future Internet architecture: Clean-slate versus evolutionary research. Communications of the ACM, 2010, 53(9): 36-40
5. Ratnasamy S, Shenker S, McCanne S. Towards an evolvable Internet architecture. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2005, 35(4): 313-324
6. Meyer D, Zhang L, Fall K. Report from the IAB workshop on routing and addressing. RFC 4984, 2007
7. Pallis G, Vakali A. Insight and perspectives for content delivery networks. Communications of the ACM, 2006, 49(1): 101-106
8. Gao W, Cao G. Fine-grained mobility characterization: Steady and transient state behaviors//Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing. Chicago, USA, 2010: 61-70
9. Azimi N, Gupta H, Hou X, Gao J. Data preservation under spatial failures in sensor networks//Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing. Chicago, USA, 2010: 171-180
10. Jacobson V. Special plenary invited short course: (CCN) Content-centric networking. Future Internet Summer School, Bremen, Germany, 2009
11. Zhang L, Estrin D et al. Named data networking (NDN) project. PARC Technical Report NDN-0001, 2010
12. Xie H, Yang R et al. P4P: Provider portal for applications//Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 Conference on Data Communication. Seattle, USA, 2008: 351-362
13. Karagiannis T, Papagiannaki K, Faloutsos M. BLINC: Multilevel traffic classification in the dark//Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications. Philadelphia, USA, 2005: 229-240
14. Farinacci D, Fuller V et al. Locator/ID separation protocol (LISP). IETF draft-ietf-lisp-09, 2010
15. Zhu Z et al. A Survey of Mobility Support in the Internet. RFC 6301, 2011
16. Parulkar G. Reinventing Internet infrastructure and services. Technical Report, USA: Standford University, 2011
17. Raychaudhuri D. MobilityFirst: A robust and trustworthy mobility-centric Architecture for the Future Internet. NSF FIA Project Summary. Technical Report of MobilityFirst Project Team: NDN-0001, 2010
18. Greenberg A, Hjalmtysson G et al. A clean slate 4D approach to network control and management. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2005, 35(5): 41-54
19. Zhang H K et al. Theory and key technologies of new generation Internet. ZTE Communications, 2008, 14(1): 17-20
20. Wu J, Cui Y et al. 4over6 transit solution using IP encapsulation and MP-BGP extensions. RFC 5747, 2010
21. Wu J, Bi J et al. A source address validation architecture (SAVA) testbed and deployment experience. RFC 5210, 2008
22. Han D et al. XIA: Efficient Support for Evolvable Internetworking//Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI'12). San Jose, USA, 2012
23. Xie G, Sun Y, Zhang Y et al. Service-oriented future Internet architecture. INFOCOM-Poster, Shanghai, China, 2011
24. Nordstrom E et al. Serval: An End-host Stack for Service-Centric Networking//Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI'12). San Jose, USA, 2012
25. Dobrescu M et al. RouteBricks: Exploiting parallelism to scale software routers//Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 22nd Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. Big Sky, USA, 2009: 15-28
26. Han S et al. PacketShader: A GPU-accelerated software router. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2010, 40(4): 195-206
27. Anwer M B, Feamster N. Building a fast, virtualized data plane with programmable hardware. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2010, 40(1): 75-82
28. Unnikrishnan D et al. Scalable network virtualization using FPGAs//Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays. Monterey, USA, 2010: 219-228
29. Yin D et al. Customizing virtual networks with partial FPGA reconfiguration//Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Virtualized Infrastructure Systems and Architectures. New Delhi, India, 2010: 57-64
30. Anwer M B et al. SwitchBlade: A platform for rapid deployment of network protocols on programmable hardware. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2010, 40(4): 183-194
31. Barham P et al. Xen and the art of virtualization//Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. Bolton Landing, USA, 2003: 164-177
32. Kohler E et al. The Click modular router. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 2000, 18(3): 263-297
33. Handley M et al. XORP: An open platform for network research. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2003, 33(1): 53-57
34. Lockwood J W et al. NetFPGA - An open platform for gigabit-rate network switching and routing//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education. San Diego, USA, 2007: 160-161
35. Xie G G, He P et al. PEARL: A programmable virtual router platform. IEEE Communication Magazine, Special Issue on Future Internet Architectures: Design and Deployment Perspectives. Communications Magazine, 2011, 49(7): 71-77
36. Chun B et al. PlanetLab: An overlay testbed for broad-coverage services. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2003, 33(3): 3-12
37. Elliott C. GENI: Opening up new classes of experiments in global networking. IEEE Internet Computing Magazine, 2010, 14: 39-42
38. Gavras A et al. Future internet research and experimentation: The FIRE initiative. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2007, 37(3): 89-92
39. Park M K et al. Implementation of a future Internet testbed on KOREN based on NetFPGA/OpenFlow switches//Proceedings of the NetFPGA Developers Workshop. Stanford, USA, 2009
40. Paul S et al. Architectures for the future networks and the next generation internet: A survey. Computer Communications, 2011, 34(1): 2-42