P4p: Provider portal for applications

Computer Communication Review

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 351-362

  Xie, Haiyong ^a   Yang, Y Richard ^a   Krishnamurthy, Arvind ^b   Liu, Yanbin Grace ^c   Silberschatz, Abraham ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Network application; Network architecture; P2p

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PERFORMANCE; EXTENSIVE SIMULATIONS; NETWORK APPLICATION; NETWORK PROVIDERS; NETWORK RESOURCES; P2P; P2P APPLICATIONS; PEER TO PEERS; SCALABLE NETWORKS;

APPLICATIONS; CONVOLUTIONAL CODES; INTERNET;

NETWORK ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 63749093433     PISSN: 01464833     EISSN: 01464833     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1402946.1402999     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. V. Aggarwal, A. Feldmann, and C. Scheideier. Can ISPs and P2P systems cooperate for improved performance? ACM CCR, July 2007.
2. D. Applegate and E. Cohen. Making intra-domain routing robust to changing and uncertain traffic demands: Understanding fundamental tradeoffs. In Proc of SIGCOMM, Karlsruhe, Germany, Aug. 2003.
3. A. Bharambe, C. Herley, and V. Padmanabhan. Analyzing and improving a BitTorrent network's performance mechanisms. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '06, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.
4. R. Bindal, P. Cao, W. Chan, J. Medval, G. Suwala, T. Bates, and A. Zhang. Improving traffic locality in Bittorrent via biased neighbor selection. In Proceedings of IEEE ICDCS '06, Lisboa, Portugal, July 2006.
5. S. Cerruti and C. Wright. ISP bandwidth billing. http ://www.servicelevel.net/rating-matters/newsletters/issue13.htm, 2002.
6. Cisco. Network-based application recognition (NBAR). www.cisco.com/ univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t8/dtnbarad.htm.
7. F5 White Paper. Bandwidth management for peer-to-peer applications. http ://www.f5.com/solutions/technology/rateshaping-wp.html, Jan. 2006.
8. K. Gummadi, R. Dunn, S. Saroiu, S. Gribble, H. Levy, and J. Zahorjan. Measurement, modeling, and analysis of a peer-topeer file-sharing workload. In Proc. of SOSP '03, Bolton Landing, Oct. 2003.
9. Joost. http://www.joost.org/whatsjoost.html.
10. S. Kandula, D. Katabi, B. Davie, and A. Charny. Walking the tightrope: Responsive yet stable traffic engineering. In Proc of SIGCOMM, Philadelphia, PA, Aug. 2005.
11. T. Karagiannis, D. Papagiannaki, and M. Faloutsos. BLINC: Multilevel traffic classification in the dark. In Proc of SIGCOMM, Philadelphia, PA, Aug. 2005.
12. T. Karagiannis, P. Rodriguez, and K. Papagiannaki. Should internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution? In Pmceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference, Berkeley, CA, Oct. 2005.
13. R. Keralapura, N. Taft, C.-N. Chuah, and G. Iannaccone. Can ISPs take the heat from overlay networks? In Proc. of HotNets-III, San Diego, CA, Nov. 2004.
14. Kontiki. http://www.kontiki.com.
15. A. Kuzmanovic and E. Knightly. TCP-LP: Low-priority service via end-point congestion control. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 14(4), Aug. 2006.
16. N. Leibowitz, A. Bergman, R. Ben-Shaul, and A. Shavit. Are file swapping networks cacheable? characterizing P2P traffic. In Proceedings of WCW, Boulder, CO, 2002.
17. H. V. Madhyastha, T. Isdal, M. Piatek, C. Dixon, T. Anderson, A. Krishnamurthy, and A. Venkataramani. iPlane: An information plane for distributed services. In Proc. of OSDI, Seattle, WA, 2006.
18. A. Odlyzko. Internet pricing and the history of communications. Computer Networks, 36(5-6):493-517, Aug. 2001.
19. P-Cube. P-Cube. http://www.p-cube.net/indexold.shtml.
20. Packeteer. Packeteer PacketShaper. http://www.packeteer.com/products/ packetshaper.
21. Pando Networks, Inc. http://www.pandonetworks.com.
22. M. Piatek, C. Dixon, A. Krishnamurthy, and T. Anderson. Liveswarms: Adapting bittorrent for end host multicast. Technical Report UW-CSE-06-11-01, University of Washington, 2006.
23. D. Qiu and R. Srikant. Modeling and performance analysis of Bittorrent-like peer-to-peer networks. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, Portland, OR, Aug. 2004.
24. L. Qiu, Y. R. Yang, Y Zhang, and S. Shenker. Selfish routing in Internet-like environments. In Proc of SIGCOMM, Karlsruhe, Germany, Aug. 2003.
25. B. Raghavan and A. C. Snoeren. A system for authenticated policy-compliant routing. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, Portland, OR, Aug. 2004.
26. RouteScience Technologies, Inc. Route optimization, for ebusiness applications. White Paper. Available at http://www.routescience.com, June 2003.
27. O. Saleh and M. Hefeeda. Modeling and caching of peer-to-peer traffic. Technical Report TR 2006-11, Simon Fraser University, May 2006.
28. Sandvine. Intelligent broadband network management. http ://www.sandvine.com.
29. S. Saroiu, K. P. Gummadi, R. J. Dunn, S. D. Gribble, and H. M. Levy. An analysis of internet content delivery systems. In. Proc of OSDI, Boston, MA, Dec. 2002.
30. S. Seetharaman and M. Ammar. Characterizing and mitigating inter-domain policy violations in overlay routes. In Proc of ICNP, 2006.
31. S. Sen, O. Spatscheck, and D. Wang. Accurate, scalable in-network identification of P2P traffic using application signatures. In Proceedings of WWWI3, New York, NY, May 2004.
32. G. Shen, Y. Wang, Y. Xiong, B. Y. Zhao, and Z.-L. Zhang. HPTP: Relieving the tension between ISPs and P2P. In Proc of IPTPS, Bellevue, WA, Feb. 2007.
33. Statelog White Paper. Peer-to-peer and bandwidth management. http://www.staselog.com/whitepaper-p2p.pdf, Mar. 2004.
34. A. Venkataramani, R. Kokku, and M. Dahlin. TCP Nice: A mechanism for background transfers. In Proc of OSDI, Boston, MA, Dec. 2002.
35. H. Wang, H. Xie, L. Qiu, A. Silberschatz, and Y. R. Yang. Optimal ISP subscription for Internet multihoming: Algorithm design and implication analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '05, Miami, FL, Apr. 2005.
36. A. Wierzbicki, N. Leibowitz, M. Ripeanu, and R. Wozniak. Cache replacement policies revisited. In Proc of GP2P, Chicago, IL, Apr. 2004.
37. R. Woundy and J. Livingood. Comcast field tests. IETF P2P infrastructure workshop, May 2008.