Decision boxes for clinicians to support evidence-based practice and shared decision making: The user experience

Implementation Science

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Giguere, Anik ^a   Légaré, France ^b   Grad, Roland ^c   Pluye, Pierre ^c   Haynes, R B ^d   Cauchon, Michel ^e   Rousseau, François ^b   Argote, Juliana A ^f   Labrecque, Michel ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Université Laval   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSIDAD DEL VALLE   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Clinical topic summary; Communication design; Counselling; Decision support; Evidence based medicine; Knowledge translation; Patient centered care; Risk communication; Usability; User experience

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

ADULT; AGED; COMMUNICATION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84864500281     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-72     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BMJ Publishing group: How much do we know? 2011, from http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ceweb/about/knowledge.jsp.
2. Wennberg JE. Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. Brit Med J 2002, 325:961-964. 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.961, 1124450, 12399352.
3. Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine. J Amer Med Assoc 2008, 300:1814-1816.
4. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Covey J, Matthews E, Pill R. Presenting risk information - A review of the effects of 'framing' and other manipulations on patient outcomes. J Health Commun 2001, 6:61-82. 10.1080/10810730150501413, 11317424.
5. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry M, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Légaré F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 5(10):CD001431.
6. Evans R, Edwards A, Brett J, Bradburn M, Watson E, Austoker J, Elwyn G. Reduction in uptake of PSA tests following decision aids: systematic review of current aids and their evaluations. Patient Educ Couns 2005, 58:13-26. 10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.009, 15950832.
7. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997, 44:681-692. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3, 9032835.
8. Légaré F. Inventory of Shared Decision Making Programs for Healthcare Professionals http://decision.chaire.fmed.ulaval.ca/index.php?id=180&L=2.
9. Harter M, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G. Policy and practice developments in the implementation of shared decision making: an international perspective. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2011, 105:229-233. 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.018, 21620313.
10. Banzi R, Liberati A, Moschetti I, Tagliabue L, Moja L. A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers. J Med Internet Res 2010, 12:e26. 10.2196/jmir.1288, 2956323, 20610379.
11. Haynes B. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the '5 S' evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions. Evid Based Nurs 2007, 10:6-7. 10.1136/ebn.10.1.6, 17218282.
12. Giguere A, Legare F, Grad R, Pluye P, Rousseau F, Haynes RB, Cauchon M, Labrecque M. Developing and user-testing Decision boxes to facilitate shared decision making in primary care - a study protocol. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011, 11:17. 10.1186/1472-6947-11-17, 3060840, 21385470.
13. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. The drug facts box: providing consumers with simple tabular data on drug benefit and harm. Med Decis Making 2007, 27:655-662. 10.1177/0272989X07306786, 17873258.
14. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011, 64:383-394. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026, 21195583.
15. Morville P. User experience Design http://www.semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000029.php.
16. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 1995, 15:25-30. 10.1177/0272989X9501500105, 7898294.
17. Pluye P, Grad RM, Johnson-Lafleur J, Bambrick T, Burnand B, Mercer J, Marlow B, Campbell C. Evaluation of email alerts in practice: Part 2 - validation of the information assessment method. J Eval Clin Pract 2010, 16:1236-1243. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01313.x, 20722882.
18. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ behav hum 1991, 50:179-211.
19. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 2000, 46:186-204.
20. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2006, 5:80-92.
21. The College of Family Physicians of Canada, Canadian Medical Association The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada: National Physician Survey http://www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/nps/2010_Survey/2010nps-e.asp, The College of Family Physicians of Canada, Canadian Medical Association.
22. Grandage KK, Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF. When less is more: a practical approach to searching for evidence-based answers. J Med Libr Assoc 2002, 90:298-304. 116402, 12113514.
23. Wang R, Bartlett G, Grad R, Pluye P. The cognitive impact of research synopses on physicians: a prospective observational analysis of evidence-based summaries sent by email. Inform Prim Care 2009, 17:79-86.
24. Peters E, Dieckmann N, Dixon A, Hibbard JH, Mertz CK. Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Med Care Res Rev 2007, 64:169-190. 10.1177/10775587070640020301, 17406019.
25. Wathen CN, Burkell J. Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tech 2002, 53:134-144.
26. Tseng S, Fogg B. Credibility and computing technology. Communications of the ACM 1999, 42:39-44.
27. Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Nylund HK, Oxman AD. User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63:607-619. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.013, 20434023.
28. Rosenbaum SE. Improving the user experience of evidence: a design approach to evidence-informed healthcare. PhD thesis 2010, The Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oslo, Norway.
29. Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63:620-626. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014, 20434024.
30. Elwyn G, O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Newcombe RG, Politi M, Durand MA, Drake E, Joseph-Williams N, Khangura S, Saarimaki A, et al. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS One 2009, 4:e4705. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004705, 2649534, 19259269.
31. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Communicating data about the benefits and harms of treatment: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2011, 155:87-96.
32. Carling CL, Kristoffersen DT, Flottorp S, Fretheim A, Oxman AD, Schunemann HJ, Akl EA, Herrin J, MacKenzie TD, Montori VM. The effect of alternative graphical displays used to present the benefits of antibiotics for sore throat on decisions about whether to seek treatment: a randomized trial. PLoS Med 2009, 6:e1000140. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000140, 2726763, 19707579.
33. Ancker JS, Senathirajah Y, Kukafka R, Starren JB. Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006, 13:608-618. 10.1197/jamia.M2115, 1656964, 16929039.
34. Epstein RM, Alper BS, Quill TE. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. J Amer Med Assoc 2004, 291:2359-2366.
35. Marriott S, Palmer C, Lelliott P. Disseminating healthcare information: getting the message across. Qual Health Care 2000, 9:58-62. 10.1136/qhc.9.1.58, 1743500, 10848372.
36. Edwards AGK, Evans R, Dundon J, Haigh S, Hood K, Elwyn GJ. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006,
37. Hill S, Spink J, Cadilhac D, Edwards A, Kaufman C, Rogers S, Ryan R, Tonkin A. Absolute risk representation in cardiovascular disease prevention: comprehension and preferences of healthcare consumers and general practitioners involved in a focus group study. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:108. 10.1186/1471-2458-10-108, 2845101, 20199692.