The revealing glance: Eye gaze behavior to concealed information

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 642-651

  Schwedes, Charlotte ^a   Wentura, Dirk ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Concealed information test; Eye movements; Familiarity; Fixation duration; Guilty knowledge test; Recollection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECEPTION; EYE FIXATION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RECOGNITION; TIME;

ADULT; DECEPTION; FACE; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864470139     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0173-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allen, J. J., Iacono, W. G., & Danielson, K. D. (1992). The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: A methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences. Psychophysiology, 29, 504-522. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 1992. tb02024. x.
2. Althoff, R. R., & Cohen, N. J. (1999). Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 997-1010.
3. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Dolev, K. (1996). Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: Effects of mental countermeasures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 273-281.
4. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131-151. doi: 10. 1037/0021-9010. 88. 1. 131.
5. Bentin, S., & Deouell, L. Y. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 35-54. doi: 10. 1080/026432900380472.
6. Bradley, M. T., MacLaren, V. V., & Carle, S. B. (1996). Deception and nondeception in guilty knowledge and guilty actions polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 153-160.
7. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
8. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Revth ed.). New York: Academic Press.
9. Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 923-938. doi: 10. 3758/BF03209340.
10. Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531-547.
11. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193146.
12. Fox, E. (2004). Maintenance or capture of attention in anxiety-relates biases? In J. Yiend (Ed.), Cognition, emotion and psychopathology: Theoretical, empirical and clinical directions (pp. 86-105). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hannula, D. E., Althoff, R. R., Warren, D. E., Riggs, L., Cohen, N. J., & Ryan, J. D. (2010). Worth a glance: Using eye movements to investigate the cognitive neuroscience of memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 166. doi: 10. 3389/fnhum. 2010. 00166.
14. Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124-138.
15. Jemel, B., Schuller, A.-M., & Goffaux, V. (2010). Characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural events occurring prior to and up to overt recognition of famous faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2289-2305.
16. Johnson, R. J. (1995). Event-related potential insights into the neurobiology of memory systems. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 10, pp. 135-163). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
17. Johnston, R. A., & Edmonds, A. J. (2009). Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: A review. Memory, 17, 577-596. doi: 10. 1080/09658210902976969.
18. Langleben, D. D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J. A., Gur, R. C., McDonald, S., Ragland, J. D.,Childress, A. R. (2002). Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnetic resonance study. NeuroImage, 15, 727-732.
19. Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-388.
20. Lykken, D. T. (1960). The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 258-262.
21. Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detector industry. American Psychologist, 29, 725-739. doi: 10. 1037/h0037441.
22. Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: Plenum.
23. MacLaren, V. V. (2001). A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 674-683. doi: 10. 1037/0021-9010. 86. 4. 674.
24. Rosenfeld, J. P. (2011). P300 in detecting concealed information. In B. Verschuere, G. Ben Shakhar, & E. Meijer (Eds.), Memory detection: Theory and application of the Concealed Information Test (pp. 63-89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Rugg, M. D. (1995). ERP studies of memory. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind (pp. 132-170). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, C. S., & Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 392, 595-598.
27. Ryan, J. D., Hannula, D. E., & Cohen, N. J. (2007). The obligatory effects of memory on eye movements. Memory, 15, 508-525.
28. Seymour, T. L., & Kerlin, J. R. (2008). Successful detection of verbal and visual concealed knowledge using an RT-based paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 475-490. doi: 10. 1002/acp. 1375.
29. Seymour, T. L., Seifert, C. M., Shafto, M. G., & Mosmann, A. L. (2000). Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 30-37. doi: 10. 1037/0021-9010. 85. 1. 30.
30. Stacey, P. C., Walker, S., & Underwood, J. D. (2005). Face processing and familiarity: Evidence from eye-movement data. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 407-422.
31. Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A., & Collins, D. (2006). The activation of pre-existing and acquired face representations: The N250 ERP as an index of face familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1488-1497.
32. Verschuere, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Meijer, E. (2011). Memory detection: Theory and application of the Concealed Information Test. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Degrootte, T., & Rosseel, Y. (2010). Detecting concealed information with reaction times: Validity and comparison with the polygraph. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 991-1002. doi: 10. 1002/acp. 1601.
34. Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Detecting concealed information in less than a second: Response latency-based measures. In B. Verschuere, G. Ben Shakhar, & E. Meijer (Eds.), Memory detection: Theory and application of the Concealed Information Test (pp. 46-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Webb, S. J., Jones, E. J. H., Merkle, K., Murias, M., Greenson, J., Richards, T.,Dawson, G. (2010). Response to familiar faces, newly familiar faces, and novel faces as assessed by ERPs is intact in adults with autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 77, 106-117.
36. Woodruff, C. C., Hayama, H. R., & Rugg, M. D. (2006). Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Research, 1100, 125-135.
37. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 2002. 2864.