The LMA Supreme™ in 700 parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery: An observational study

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 59, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 648-654

  Yao, Wei Yu ^a   Li, Shi Yang ^a   Sng, Ban Leong ^b   Lim, Yvonne ^b   Sia, Alex Tiong Heng ^b  

^a Quanzhou Women and Children's Hospital   (China)

^b KK WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; PROPOFOL; ROCURONIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ASPIRATION; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OXYGENATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SORE THROAT;

ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84864459579     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-012-9718-4     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. OK Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme-a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 405-10.
2. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 602-7.
3. OK Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 815-9.
4. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 852-7.
5. OK Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme-a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 79-83.
6. OK Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, et al. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 555-62.
7. OK Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, et al. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 111: 55-62.
8. OK Abdi W, Amathieu R, Adhoum A, et al. Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme and the ETT. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 141-6.
9. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH. LMAClassic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 71-7.
10. OK Abdi W, Dhonneur G, Amathieu R, et al. LMA supreme versus facemask ventilation performed by novices: a comparative study in morbidly obese patients showing difficult ventilation predictors. Obes Surg 2009; 19: 1624-30.
11. Lopez AM, Valero R, Brimacombe J. Insertion and use of the LMA Supreme in the prone position. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 154-7.
12. OK Sharma V, Verghese C, McKenna PJ. Prospective audit on the use of the LMA-Supreme for airway management of adult patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in prone position. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 228-32.
13. OK Braude D, Southard A, Bajema T, Sims E, Martinez J. Rapid sequence airway using the LMA-Supreme as a primary airway for 9 h in a multi-system trauma patient. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1217.
14. OK Sharma B, Sahai C, Sood J, Kumra VP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in two failed obstetric tracheal intubation scenarios. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 338-9.
15. Cook TM, Brooks TS, Van der Westhuizen J, Clarke M. The Proseal LMA is a useful rescue device during failed rapid sequence intubation: two additional cases. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 630-3.
16. Vaida SJ, Gaitini LA. Another case of use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in a difficult obstetric airway. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 905; author reply 905.
17. Bullingham A. Use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for airway maintenance during emergency caesarean section after failed intubation. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 903; author reply 904.
18. OK Awan R, Nolan JP, Cook TM. Use of a ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for airway maintenance during emergency caesarean section after failed tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 144-6.
19. Evans NR, Skowno JJ, Bennett PJ, James MF, Dyer RA. A prospective observational study of the use of the Proseal laryngeal mask airway for postpartum tubal ligation. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005; 14: 90-5.
20. OK Ali A, Canturk S, Turkmen A, Turgut N, Altan A. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26: 1010-4.
21. OK de Caestecker JS, Blackwell JN, Pryde A, Heading RC. Daytime gastro-oesophageal reflux is important in oesophagitis. Gut 1987; 28: 519-26.
22. OK Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1017-20.
23. OK Lim Y, Goel S, Brimacombe Jr. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007; 35: 52-6.
24. Bercker S, Schmidbauer W, Volk T, et al. A comparison of seal in seven supraglottic airway devices using a cadaver model of elevated esophageal pressure. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 445-8.
25. OK Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, Bogusch G, Mager G, Kerner T. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 135-9.
26. OK Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF. ProSeal laryngeal mask protects against aspiration of fluid in the pharynx. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 584-7.
27. OK Vaida SJ, Pott LM, Budde AO, Gaitini LA. Suggested algorithm for management of the unexpected difficult airway in obstetric anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 385-6.
28. OK Mendelson CL. The aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs during obstetric anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1946; 52: 191-205.
29. OK Han TH, Brimacombe J, Lee EJ, Yang HS. The laryngeal mask airway is effective (and probably safe) in selected healthy parturients for elective cesarean section: a prospective study of 1067 cases. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 1117-21.
30. OK Halaseh BK, Sukkar ZF, Hassan LH, Sia AT, Bushnaq WA, Adarbeh H. The use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in caesarean section-experience in 3000 cases. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 1023-8.
31. OK Lyons G. Failed intubation. Six years' experience in a teaching maternity unit. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 759-62.
32. OK Samsoon GL, Young Jr. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 487-90.
33. OK Barnardo PD, Jenkins JG. Failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics: a 6-year review in a UK region. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 690-4.
34. OK Elkington KW. At the water's edge: where obstetrics and anesthesia meet. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 304-8.
35. OK Hunter AR, Moir DD. Confidential enquiry into maternal deaths. Br J Anaesth 1983; 55: 367-9.
36. May WJ, Greiss FC Jr. Maternal mortality in North Carolina: a forty-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 555-60. discussion 560-1.
37. OK Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 1105-11.