Embracing change: Practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Hochstenbach Waelen, Ananda ^a,b   Seelen, Henk A M ^a,c  

^a Adelante Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Brain injury; Implementation; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Technology; Therapy; Upper extremity; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

ARM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONVALESCENCE; HAND; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KINESIOTHERAPY; MASS COMMUNICATION; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REHABILITATION; REVIEW;

ARM; COGNITION DISORDERS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EXERCISE THERAPY; HAND; HUMANS; MOTOR SKILLS; PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REHABILITATION; SOFTWARE; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84864448393     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-52     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. European Commission, Stroke research in the European Union Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2007
2. Arm function after stroke: from physiology to recovery. Krakauer JW, Semin Neurol 2005 25 384 395 10.1055/s-2005-923533 16341995
3. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ, Disabil Rehabil 1999 21 357 364 10.1080/096382899297459 10503976
4. The impact of stroke on the performance of grasping: usefulness of kinetic and kinematic motion analysis. Nowak DA, Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008 32 1439 1450 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.021 18582943
5. Quality of life after stroke: the importance of a good recovery. Carod-Artal FJ, Egido JA, Cerebrovasc Dis 2009 27 Suppl 1 204 214 19342853
6. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S, Stroke 2002 33 1840 1844 10.1161/01.STR.0000019289.15440.F2 12105363
7. A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke: the importance of social relationships. Lynch EB, Butt Z, Heinemann A, Victorson D, Nowinski CJ, Perez L, Cella D, J Rehabil Med 2008 40 518 523 10.2340/16501977-0203 18758667
8. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, Cox Steck GA, Spichiger R, Vereeck LE, Putman KD, Van Hoydonck GA, Stroke 1998 29 785 792 10.1161/01.STR.29.4.785 9550512
9. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M, Disabil Rehabil 2003 25 565 571 10.1080/0963828031000137063 12959329
10. World Health Organization, Towards a common language for Functioning Geneva: Disability and Health ICF 2002
11. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Giuliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D, Jama 2006 296 2095 2104 10.1001/jama.296.17.2095 17077374
12. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, Carey LM, Occup Ther Int 2009 16 175 189 10.1002/oti.275 19504501
13. Additional task-related practice improves mobility and upper limb function early after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Blennerhassett J, Dite W, Aust J Physiother 2004 50 219 224 15574110
14. Constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Hakkennes S, Keating JL, Aust J Physiother 2005 51 221 231 10.1016/S0004-9514(05)70003-9 16321129
15. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath RE, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 85 14 18 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00481-7 14970962
16. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J, Clin Rehabil 2004 18 833 862 10.1191/ 0269215504cr843oa 15609840
17. Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data. Truelsen T, Piechowski-Jozwiak B, Bonita R, Mathers C, Bogousslavsky J, Boysen G, Eur J Neurol 2006 13 581 598 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01138.x 16796582
18. Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. Balasubramanian S, Klein J, Burdet E, Curr Opin Neurol 2010 23 661 670 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833e99a4 20852421
19. Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Willmann RD, Kingma H, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 1 10.1186/1743-0003-6-1 19154570
20. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC, Top Stroke Rehabil 2007 14 22 44 10.1310/tsr1406-22 18174114
21. Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke: current status and challenges to clinical acceptance. Lum P, Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, Rymer WZ, Burgar C, Top Stroke Rehabil 2002 8 40 53 10.1310/9KFM-KF81-P9A4-5WW0 14523729
22. Zorg Onderzoek Nederland, Met het oog op toepassing. Beleidsnota Implementatie ZON 1997-1999 Den Haag: ZON 1997
23. What's new in new technologies for upper extremity rehabilitation? Brochard S, Robertson J, Medee B, Remy-Neris O, Curr Opin Neurol 2010 23 683 687 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833f61ce 20852420
24. Interventions to promote upper limb recovery in stroke survivors with severe paresis: a systematic review. Hayward K, Barker R, Brauer S, Disabil Rehabil 2010 32 1973 1986 10.3109/09638288.2010.481027 20964563
25. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 111 121 17876068
26. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 4 D006876 18843735
27. Influence of task-oriented training content on skilled arm-hand performance in stroke: a systematic review. Timmermans AA, Spooren AI, Kingma H, Seelen HA, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 858 870 10.1177/1545968310368963 20921325
28. Hancock B, Trent Focus Group, Trent Focus Group, Trent Focus for Research and Development in Primary Health Care: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Nottingham UK: Trent Focus Group 1998
29. Prins A, Organisatie van kennisgebruik Inventarisatie van voorzieningen voor implementatie van het fundamenteel medisch onderzoek in Nederland Groningen: ZONMW 2011
30. Grol R, Wensing M, Implementatie Maarssen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg. Effectieve verandering in de patintenzorg 2001
31. Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovations. Rogers EM, Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1995 21 324 328 7581733
32. Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 2005
33. Design, implementation and clinical tests of a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation. Rosati G, Gallina P, Masiero S, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 560 569 18198714
34. Advanced technologies in stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Jones M, Mueller J, Morris J, Top Stroke Rehabil 2010 17 323 327 10.1310/tsr1705-323 21131256
35. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities. Riener R, Nef T, Colombo G, Med Biol Eng Comput 2005 43 2 10 10.1007/BF02345116 15742713
36. Design issues for therapeutic robot systems: results from a survey of physiotherapists. Lee M, Rittenhouse M, Hussein AA, J Intell Robot Syst 2005 42 239 252 10.1007/s10846-004-7194-y
37. Advances in the understanding and treatment of stroke impairment using robotic devices. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Top Stroke Rehabil 2005 12 22 35 10.1310/RYT5-62N4-CTVX-8JTE 15940582
38. Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation: translating research into practice. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Top Stroke Rehabil 2004 11 11 19 10.1310/G8XB-VM23-1TK7-PWQU 15592986
39. Acceptability of robot assisted active arm exercise as part of rehabilitation after stroke. Jackson AE, Makower SG, Culmer PR, Holt RJ, Cozens JA, Levesley MC, Bhakta BB, In ICORR IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics: June 2009 1 23-26 103 108
40. Developing a user interface for the iPAM stroke rehabilitation system. Kemna S, Culmer PR, Jackson AE, Makower S, Gallagher JF, Holt R, Cnossen F, Cozens JA, Levesley MC, Bhakta BB, ICORR 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics 2009 2 879 884 23-26 June
41. Translating research into clinical practice: integrating robotics into neurorehabilitation for stroke survivors. Backus D, Winchester P, Tefertiller C, Top Stroke Rehabil 2010 17 362 370 10.1310/tsr1705-362 21131261
42. Arm studio to intensify the upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: concept, acceptance, utilization and preliminary clinical results. Buschfort R, Brocke J, Hess A, Werner C, Waldner A, Hesse S, J Rehabil Med 2010 42 310 314 20461332
43. Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. Dijkers MP, de Bear PC, Erlandson RF, Kristy K, Geer DM, Nichols A, J Rehabil Res Dev 1991 28 33 44 2066869