The science of opinion: Survey methods in research;La science de l'opinion: Les méthodes d'enquete dans le domaine de la recherche

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 59, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 736-742

  Bryson, Gregory L ^a   Turgeon, Alexis F ^b   Choi, Peter T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ATTITUDE; DATA PROCESSING; HYPOTHESIS; INTERNAL BIAS; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OBSERVATION UNIT; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SAMPLE; STANDARDIZATION; STUDY DESIGN; SURVEY METHOD;

DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84864423773     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-012-9727-3     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe. Conference of European Statisticians. Statistical standards and studies - No. 53. Terminology on statistical metadata. United Nations, Geneva, 2000. Available from URL: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/53meta daterminology.pdf (accessed March 2012).
2. Lohr SL. Sampling: Design and Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press; 1999.
3. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, Mail, and MixedMode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
4. th edition, 2011 AAPOR. Available from URL: www.aapor.org/(accessed March 2012).
5. Burns KE, Duffett M, Kho ME, et al. ACCADEMY Group. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ 2008; 179: 245-52.
6. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, et al. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002; 324: 1183.
7. Story DA, Gin V, na Ranong V, Poustie S, Jones D. ANZCA Trials Group. Inconsistent survey reporting in anesthesia journals. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 591-5.
8. Huston P. Reporting on surveys: information for authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ 1996; 154: 1695-704.
9. Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15: 261-6.
10. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2004; 6: e34.