Multicenter study of preservative sensitivity in patients with suspected cosmetic contact dermatitis in Korea

Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 677-681

  Lee, Sang S ^a   Hong, Dong K ^a   Jeong, Nam J ^a   Lee, Jeung H ^a   Choi, Yun Seok ^b   Lee, Ai Young ^b   Lee, Cheol Heon ^c   Kim, Kea J ^d   Park, Hae Y ^d   Yang, Jun Mo ^d   Lee, Ga Young ^d   Lee, Joon ^d   Eun, Hee C ^e   Moon, Kee Chan ^f   Seo, Seong J ^g   Hong, Chang K ^g   Lee, Sang W ^h   Choi, Hae Y ^h   Lee, Jun Y ⁱ  

^a Chungnam National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Dongguk University   (South Korea)

^c Hallym University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^f University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^g Chung Ang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^h Ewha Womans University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

ⁱ The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

allergic contact dermatitis; cosmetics; irritancy; preservatives; sensitivity

Indexed keywords

2 BROMO 2 BROMOMETHYLGLUTARONITRILE; 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; 2 PHENOXYETHANOL; 4 HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID ESTER; 5 CHLORO 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; ALLERGEN; BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE; CARBAMIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE; CHLOROACETAMIDE; CHLOROXYLENOL; CHLORPHENESIN; COSMETIC; CRESOL; DIAZOLIDINYL UREA; DODECYL GALLATE; ETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; GALLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; GALLIC ACID PROPYL ESTER; HYDANTOIN DERIVATIVE; PETROLATUM; PHENYLMERCURIC ACETATE; PYRITHIONE SODIUM; QUATERNIUM 15; SORBIC ACID; THIOMERSAL; TRIAZINE DERIVATIVE; TRIETHANOLAMINE; UNINDEXED DRUG; UREA DERIVATIVE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COSMETIC CONTACT DERMATITIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IRRITANCY PATCH TEST; LABORATORY TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; PRESERVATIVE HYPERSENSITIVITY; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN MANIFESTATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BENZALKONIUM COMPOUNDS; CHLORPHENESIN; COSMETICS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PRESERVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; THIAZOLES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864418079     PISSN: 03852407     EISSN: 13468138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2012.01551.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Goossens A, Beck MH, Haneke E, et al. Adverse cutaneous reactions to cosmetic allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 40: 112-114.
2. Jung YJ, Jugee N, Hong JS, et al. A study of the patch test results with preservative antigens for patients with suspected cosmetic contact dermatitis. Korean J Dermatol 2010; 48: 109-114.
3. Brasch J, Geier J, Henseler T,. Evaluation of patch test results by use of the reaction index-an analysis of data recorded by the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 375-380. (Pubitemid 26004149)
4. Kuss O, Dickel H,. A confidence interval for the reaction index. Contact Dermatitis 2010; 62: 252-253.
5. Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Schnuch A,. The positivity ratio-another parameter to assess the diagnostic quality of a patch test preparation. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 280-282. (Pubitemid 36960371)
6. Boyvat A, Akyol A, Gürgey E,. Contact sensitivity to preservatives in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52: 329-332. (Pubitemid 40839896)
7. KieÄ-SwierczyÅska M, Krecisz B, SwierczyÅska-Machura D,. Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics. Med Pr 2006; 57: 245-249.
8. Tomar J, Jain VK, Aggarwal K, Dayal S, Gupta S,. Contact allergies to cosmetics: testing with 52 cosmetic ingredients and personal products. J Dermatol 2005; 32: 951-955. (Pubitemid 43258817)
9. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T,. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from benzalkonium chloride. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42: 357-358. (Pubitemid 30333251)
10. Fransway AF,. The problem of preservatives in the 1990s. III. Agents with preservative function independent of formaldehyde release. Am J Contact Dermat 1991; 2: 145-174.
11. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, Frosch PJ,. Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides. Results from a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138: 467-476. (Pubitemid 28145516)
12. Willis CM, Stephens CJM, Wilkinson JD,. Experimentally induced irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18: 20-24.
13. Brasch J, Henseler T, Frosch PJ,. Patch test reactions to a preliminary preservative series. Dermatosen 1993; 41: 71-75.
14. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Schnuch A,. Is the irritant benzalkonium chloride a contact allergen? A contribution to the ongoing debate from a clinical perspective Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58: 359-363. (Pubitemid 351733065)
15. Ale S, Maibach HI,. Clinical relevance in allergic contact dermatitis, an algorithmic approach. Dermatosen 1995; 43: 119.
16. Perrenoud D, Bircher A, Hunziker T, et al. Frequency of sensitization to 13 common preservatives in Switzerland. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 30: 276-279. (Pubitemid 24156849)
17. Katsarou A, Lambrinopoulou K, Armenaka M,. The positivity of thimerosal in Greece. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 291-292. (Pubitemid 29490842)
18. Freiman A, Al-Layali A, Sasseville D,. Patch testing with thimerosal in a Canadian center: an 11-year experience. Am J Contact Dermat 2003; 14: 138-143. (Pubitemid 37433428)
19. Suneja T, Belsito DV,. Timerosal in the detection of clinically relevant reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45: 23-27. (Pubitemid 32655688)
20. Kim DH, Kim HI, Park HY, et al. Patch test in the suspected cosmetic contact dermatitis. Korean J Dermatol 1987; 25: 161-168.
21. Lundov MD, Moesby L, Zachariae C, et al. Contamination versus preservation of cosmetics: a review on legislation, usage, infections, and contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2009; 60: 70-78.
22. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menné T, Johansen JD,. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population-prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57: 287-299. (Pubitemid 47568789)
23. Czarnobilska E, Obtulowicz K, Dyga W, Spiewak R,. The most important contact sensitizers in Polish children and adolescents with atopy and chronic recurrent eczema as detected with the extended European Baseline Series. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2011; 22: 252-256.
24. Uter W,; The ESSCA Writing Group. The European Surveillance System of Contact Allergies (ESSCA): results of patch testing the standard series, 2004. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008; 22: 174-181.
25. Timmermans A, De Hertog S, Gladys K, Vanacker H, Goossens A,. 'Dermatologically tested' baby toilet tissues: a cause of allergic contact dermatitis in adults. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57: 97-99. (Pubitemid 47052291)
26. Jong CT, Statham BN, Green CM, et al. Contact sensitivity in the UK, 2004-2005: results of multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57: 165-168. (Pubitemid 47228513)
27. Brown R,. Chlorphenesin sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1981; 7: 162.
28. Burns DA,. Allergic contact sensitivity to chlorphenesin. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 14: 246. (Pubitemid 16114444)
29. Goh CL,. Dermatitis from chlorphenesin in a deodorant. Contact Dermatitis 1987; 16: 287. (Pubitemid 17074224)
30. Wakelin SH, White IR,. Dermatitis from chlorphenesin in a facial cosmetic. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 37: 138-139. (Pubitemid 27443289)
31. Brown VL, Orton DI,. Two cases of facial dermatitis due to chlorphenesin in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52: 48-49. (Pubitemid 40293095)