A coarse-grained model for synergistic action of multiple enzymes on cellulose

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Asztalos, Andrea ^a,b,c   Daniels, Marcus ^d   Sethi, Anurag ^a,e   Shen, Tongye ^a,e,f   Langan, Paul ^d,g   Redondo, Antonio ^e   Gnanakaran, Sandrasegaram ^e  

^a CENTER FOR NONLINEAR STUDIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^c Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^d LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^e LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^g OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based model; Cellulose degradation; Endo cellulase; Exo cellulase; Spatial heterogeneity; Synergy

Indexed keywords

AGENT-BASED MODEL; CELLULOSE DEGRADATION; ENDO-CELLULASE; EXO-CELLULASE; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; SYNERGY;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; GLUCOSE; HYDROGEN BONDS; REACTION RATES;

CELLULOSE;

CATALYSIS; CELLULOSE; DEGRADATION; ENZYME; GLUCOSE; HETEROGENEITY; HYDROLYSIS; REACTION RATE; STOCHASTICITY; SUBSTRATE; SYNERGISM;

EID: 84864411037     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-55     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Goldemberg J, Science 2007 315 5813 808 810 10.1126/science.1137013 17289989
2. Cellulase for commodity products from cellulosic biomass. Himmel ME, Ruth MF, Wyman CE, Curr Opin Biotechnol 1999 10 4 358 364 10.1016/S0958-1669(99) 80065-2 10449322 (Pubitemid 29373950)
3. Fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Lynd LR, Cushman JH, Nichols RJ, Wyman CE, Science 1991 251 4999 1318 1323 10.1126/science.251.4999.1318 17816186
4. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2005 44 22 3358 3393 10.1002/anie.200460587 15861454 (Pubitemid 40793591)
5. Cleavage of cellulose by a CBM33 protein. Forsberg Z, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Bunaes AC, Stenstrm Y, MacKenzie A, Sorlie M, Horn SJ, Eijsink VG, Protein Sci 2011 20 9 1479 1483 10.1002/pro.689 21748815
6. Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. Davies G, Henrissat B, Structure 1995 3 9 853 859 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00220-9 8535779
7. IUBMB, Enzyme Nomenclature Academic, San Diego 1992
8. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002 66 3 506 577 table of contents 10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002 12209002 (Pubitemid 35005827)
9. Crystalline cellulose degradation: new insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Teeri TT, Trends Biotechnol 1997 15 5 160 167 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01032-9 (Pubitemid 27219573)
10. Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases: why so efficient on crystalline cellulose? Teeri TT, Koivula A, Linder M, Wohlfahrt G, Divne C, Jones TA, Biochem Soc Trans 1998 26 2 173 178 9649743 (Pubitemid 28263691)
11. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Zhang YH, Lynd LR, Biotechnol Bioeng 2004 88 7 797 824 10.1002/bit.20282 15538721 (Pubitemid 40003769)
12. Cross-synergistic interactions between components of the cellulase systems of Talaromyces emersonii, Fusarium solani, Penicillium funiculosum and Trichoderma koningii. Coughlan M, Moloney A, McCrae S, Wood T, Biochem Soc Trans 1987 15 263 264
13. The 1,4-b-glucan cellobiohydrolases of Trichoderma reesei. Fgerstam L, Pettersson L, FEBS Lett 1980 119 97 100 10.1016/0014-5793(80)81006-4
14. Synergism of Cellulases from Trichoderma reesei in the Degradation of Cellulose. Henrissat B, Driguez H, Viet C, Schulein M, Nat Biotech 1985 3 8 722 726 10.1038/nbt0885-722
15. The Cellulases Endoglucanase I and Cellobiohydrolase II of Trichoderma reesei Act Synergistically To Solubilize Native Cotton Cellulose but Not To Decrease Its Molecular Size. Kleman-Leyer KM, Siika-Aho M, Teeri TT, Kirk TK, Appl Environ Microbiol 1996 62 8 2883 2887 16535380 (Pubitemid 26260095)
16. Hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose by cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase II from Trichoderma reesei: adsorption, sugar production pattern, and synergism of the enzymes. Medve J, Karlsson J, Lee D, Tjerneld F, Biotechnol Bioeng 1998 59 5 621 634 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980905)59:5<621::AID- BIT13>3.0.CO;2-C 10099380 (Pubitemid 28350464)
17. Petterson LG, Symposium on Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose SITRA, Helsinski 1975
18. Xu Q, Adney W, Sing S-Y, Himmel ME: Industrial Enzymes: Structure Springer Netherlands, Function and Applications 2007
19. Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS, Biotechnol Adv 2009 27 6 833 848 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.06.005 19577626
20. A mechanistic model of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Levine SE, Fox JM, Blanch HW, Clark DS, Biotechnol Bioeng 2010 107 1 37 51 10.1002/bit.22789 20506540
21. Kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: analytical description of a mechanistic model. Okazaki M, Moo-Young M, Biotechnol Bioeng 1978 20 5 637 663 10.1002/bit.260200503 417746 (Pubitemid 8324169)
22. A functionally based model for hydrolysis of cellulose by fungal cellulase. Zhang YH, Lynd LR, Biotechnol Bioeng 2006 94 5 888 898 10.1002/bit.20906 16685742 (Pubitemid 44186896)
23. Cellulose hydrolysis in evolving substrate morphologies II: Numerical results and analysis. Zhou W, Hao Z, Xu Y, Schuttler HB, Biotechnol Bioeng 2009 104 2 275 289 10.1002/bit.22388 19526467
24. Cellulose hydrolysis in evolving substrate morphologies I: A general modeling formalism. Zhou W, Schuttler HB, Hao Z, Xu Y, Biotechnol Bioeng 2009 104 2 261 274 10.1002/bit.22389 19575461
25. Cellulose hydrolysis in evolving substrate morphologies III: time-scale analysis. Zhou W, Xu Y, Schuttler HB, Biotechnol Bioeng 2010 107 2 224 234 10.1002/bit.22814 20518068
26. A mechanistic model for enzymatic saccharification of cellulose using continuous distribution kinetics I: depolymerization by EGI and CBHI. Griggs AJ, Stickel JJ, Lischeske JJ, Biotechnol Bioeng 2012 109 3 665 675 10.1002/bit.23355 22034153
27. A mechanistic model for enzymatic saccharification of cellulose using continuous distribution kinetics II: cooperative enzyme action, solution kinetics, and product inhibition. Griggs AJ, Stickel JJ, Lischeske JJ, Biotechnol Bioeng 2012 109 3 676 685 10.1002/bit.23354 22034106
28. fA cellular automaton model of crystalline cellulose hydrolysis by cellulases. Warden AC, Little BA, Haritos VS, Biotechnol Biofuels 2011 4 1 39 10.1186/1754-6834-4-39 22005054
29. Applications of computational science for understanding enzymatic deconstruction of cellulose. Beckham GT, Bomble YJ, Bayer EA, Himmel ME, Crowley MF, Curr Opin Biotechnol 2011 22 2 231 238 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.11.005 21168322
30. The energy landscape for the interaction of the family 1 carbohydrate-binding module and the cellulose surface is altered by hydrolyzed glycosidic bonds. Bu L, Beckham GT, Crowley MF, Chang CH, Matthews JF, Bomble YJ, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Nimlos MR, J Phys Chem B 2009 113 31 10994 11002 10.1021/jp904003z 19594145
31. Molecular modeling suggests induced fit of Family I carbohydrate-binding modules with a broken-chain cellulose surface. Nimlos MR, Matthews JF, Crowley MF, Walker RC, Chukkapalli G, Brady JW, Adney WS, Cleary JM, Zhong L, Himmel ME, Protein Eng Des Sel 2007 20 4 179 187 10.1093/protein/gzm010 17430975 (Pubitemid 351321299)
32. Interactions of the complete cellobiohydrolase I from Trichodera reesei with microcrystalline cellulose \beta. Zhong L, Matthews JF, Crowley MF, Rignall T, Talon C, Cleary JM, Walker RC, Chukkapalli G, McCabe C, Nimlos MR, et al. Cellulose 2008 15 261 273 10.1007/s10570-007-9186-0
33. Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocreajecorina). Martinez D, Berka RM, Henrissat B, Saloheimo M, Arvas M, Baker SE, Chapman J, Chertkov O, Coutinho PM, Cullen D, et al. Nat Biotechnol 2008 26 5 553 560 10.1038/nbt1403 18454138 (Pubitemid 351668043)
34. High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Divne C, Stahlberg J, Teeri TT, Jones TA, J Mol Biol 1998 275 2 309 325 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1437 9466911 (Pubitemid 28030006)
35. The crystal structure of the catalytic core domain of endoglucanase I from Trichoderma reesei at 3.6 A resolution, and a comparison with related enzymes. Kleywegt GJ, Zou JY, Divne C, Davies GJ, Sinning I, Stahlberg J, Reinikainen T, Srisodsuk M, Teeri TT, Jones TA, J Mol Biol 1997 272 3 383 397 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1243 9325098 (Pubitemid 27410052)
36. Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei. Rouvinen J, Bergfors T, Teeri T, Knowles JK, Jones TA, Science 1990 249 4967 380 386 10.1126/science.2377893 2377893
37. Technical communication: survey and analysis of commercial cellulase preparations suitable for biomass conversion to ethanol. Nieves RA, Ehrman CI, Adney WS, Elander RT, Himmel ME, World J Microbiol Biotechnol 1998 14 301 304 (Pubitemid 28167304)
38. Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Percival Zhang YH, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR, Biotechnol Adv 2006 24 5 452 481 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.03.003 16690241 (Pubitemid 44082013)
39. Parallel-up structure evidences the molecular directionality during biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose. Koyama M, Helbert W, Imai T, Sugiyama J, Henrissat B, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997 94 17 9091 9095 10.1073/pnas.94.17. 9091 9256440 (Pubitemid 27357787)
40. A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation. Gillespie DT, Physica A 1992 188 404 425 10.1016/0378-4371(92)90283-V
41. Studies of the cellulolytic system of the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Substrate specificity and transfer activity of endoglucanase I. Claeyssens M, van Tilbeurgh H, Kamerling JP, Berg J, Vrsanska M, Biely P, Biochem J 1990 270 1 251 256 2396985 (Pubitemid 20275604)
42. The endo-1,4 - glucanase I from Trichoderma reesei. Biely P, VrAnskÁ M, Claeyssens M, Eur J Biochem 1991 200 1 157 163 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb21062.x 1879420
43. The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Divne C, Stahlberg J, Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Pettersson G, Knowles JK, Teeri TT, Jones TA, Science 1994 265 5171 524 528 10.1126/science.8036495 8036495 (Pubitemid 24264997)
44. Identification of two functionally different classes of exocellulases. Barr BK, Hsieh YL, Ganem B, Wilson DB, Biochemistry 1996 35 2 586 592 10.1021/bi9520388 8555231 (Pubitemid 26032711)
45. High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. Igarashi K, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Penttila M, Samejima M, J Biol Chem 2009 284 52 36186 36190 10.1074/jbc.M109.034611 19858200
46. A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions. Gillespie DT, J Comput Phys 1976 22 403 434 10.1016/0021-9991(76)90041-3 (Pubitemid 8008311)
47. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. Gillespie DT, J Phys Chem 1977 81 25 2340 2361 10.1021/j100540a008
48. Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Analysis of domain function in two cellobiohydrolases by limited proteolysis. Tomme P, Van Tilbeurgh H, Pettersson G, Van Damme J, Vandekerckhove J, Knowles J, Teeri T, Claeyssens M, Eur J Biochem 1988 170 3 575 581 10.1111/j.1432-1033. 1988.tb13736.x 3338453
49. Hydrogen Bond Dissociation and Reformation in Methanol Oligomers Following Hydroxyl Stretch Relaxation. Gaffney KJ, Davis PH, Piletic IR, Levinger NE, Fayer MD, J Phys Chem A 2002 106 50 12012 12023 10.1021/jp021696g
50. A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (cel7A) and endoglucanase I (cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei. Eriksson T, Karlsson J, Tjerneld F, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2002 101 1 41 60 10.1385/ABAB:101:1:41 12008866 (Pubitemid 34460685)
51. Acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergistic action between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I. Valjamae P, Sild V, Nutt A, Pettersson G, Johansson G, Eur J Biochem 1999 266 2 327 334 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00853.x 10561572
52. Cellulose- and xylan-degrading thermophilic anaerobic bacteria from biocompost. Sizova MV, Izquierdo JA, Panikov NS, Lynd LR, Appl Environ Microbiol 2011 77 7 2282 2291 10.1128/AEM.01219-10 21317267
53. Surface diffusion of cellulases and their isolated binding domains on cellulose. Jervis EJ, Haynes CA, Kilburn DG, J Biol Chem 1997 272 38 24016 24023 10.1074/jbc.272.38.24016 9295354 (Pubitemid 27410986)
54. Cellulose hydrolysis by the cellulases from Trichoderma reesei: adsorptions of two cellobiohydrolases, two endocellulases and their core proteins on filter paper and their relation to hydrolysis. Nidetzky B, Steiner W, Claeyssens M, Biochem J 1994 303 Pt 3 817 823 7980450 (Pubitemid 24326016)
55. The cellulose-binding domain of the major cellobiohydrolase of Trichoderma reesei exhibits true reversibility and a high exchange rate on crystalline cellulose. Linder M, Teeri TT, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996 93 22 12251 12255 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12251 8901566 (Pubitemid 26367128)
56. The interaction of carbohydrate-binding modules with insoluble non-crystalline cellulose is enthalpically driven. Boraston A, Biochem J 2005 385 479 484 15487986 (Pubitemid 40165081)
57. Cellulose hydrolysis by the cellulases from Trichoderma reesei: a new model for synergistic interaction. Nidetzky B, Steiner W, Hayn M, Claeyssens M, Biochem J 1994 298 Pt 3 705 710 8141786 (Pubitemid 24085199)