Empirical analysis of anticipatory standardization processes: A case study

Information Systems and e-Business Management

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 325-350

  Umapathy, Karthikeyan ^a   Purao, Sandeep ^b   Bagby, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Activities; DSN framework; ICT standards; Roles; Standardization process; Web services

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864409753     PISSN: 16179846     EISSN: 16179854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10257-011-0169-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams R, Rivaldo R, Germoglio G, Santos F, Chen Y, Milojicic DS (2008) Improving distributed service management using Service Modeling Language (SML). Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS). IEEE, pp 863-866.
2. ATLAS. ti. (2005) ATLAS. ti. Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
3. Barros A, Dumas M, Oaks P (2005) A critical overview of the web services choreography description language (WS-CDL). http://www. bptrends. com/publicationfiles/03-05%20WP%20WS-CDL%20Barros%20et%20al. pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2009.
4. Cargill CF (1997) Open systems standardization: a business approach. Prentice Hall, NJ.
5. Choi B, Raghu TS, Vinze A, Dooley KJ (2009) Process model for e-business standards development: a case of ebXML standards. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 56(3): 448-467.
6. Feuerlicht G (2005) Design of service interfaces for e-business applications using data normalization techniques. Inf Syst E-Bus Manag 3(4): 363-376.
7. Fomin V, Keil T, Lyytinen K (2003) Theorizing about standardization: integrating fragments of process theory in light of telecommunication standardization wars. Sprouts: working papers on information environments. Systems and organizations 3(Winter).
8. Gebauer J, Tang Y, Baimai C (2008) User requirements of mobile technology: results from a content analysis of user reviews. Inf Syst E-Bus Manag 6(4): 361-384.
9. Hill JL (2003) ICT standardization: changing the world for a better tomorrow. Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, pp 21-23.
10. ISO (2010) Discover ISO: why standards matter. http://www. iso. org/iso/about/discover-iso_why-standards-matter. htm. Accessed 8 Apr 2010.
11. Kretschmer T, Muehlfeld K (2004, October) Co-opetition in standard-setting: the case of the compact disc. NET institute working paper no. 04-14.
12. Krippendorff K (2003) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
13. Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker W, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 225-258.
14. Lehr W (1992) Standardization: understanding the process. J Am Soc Inf Sci 43(8): 550-555.
15. Li M-S, Cabral R, Doumeingts G, Popplewell K (2006) Enterprise interoperability research roadmap. http://cordis. europa. eu/ist/ict-ent-net/ei-roadmap_en. htm. Accessed 9 Apr 2010.
16. Lombard M, Snyder-Duch J, Bracken CC (2002) Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Hum Commun Res 28(4): 587-604.
17. Lyytinen K, Keil T, Fomin V (2008) A framework to build process theories of anticipatory information and communication technology (ICT) standardizing. Int J IT Stand Stand Res 6(1): 1-38.
18. Neuendorf KA (2001) The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
19. Purao S, Bagby J, Umapathy K (2008) Standardizing web services: overcoming Design by Committee. IEEE congress on services-part I. IEEE Computer Society, pp 223-230.
20. Sheldon S, Kevin V (2006) The symbolic interactionist frame. In: Delamater J (ed) Handbook of social psychology. Springer, New York, pp 3-28.
21. Simon HA (1977) The new science of management decision. Prentice Hall PTR, NJ.
22. Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
23. SML (2009, May 12) Service modeling language. http://www. w3. org/TR/2009/REC-sml-20090512/. Accessed 2 Sept 2010.
24. SOAP (2003, 24 June 2003) Simple object access protocol (SOAP) Version 1. 2. http://www. w3. org/TR/soap12-part1/. Accessed 19 Feb 2005.
25. Stemler S (2001) An overview of content analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 7(17). http://pareonline. net/getvn. asp?v=7& n=17.
26. Umapathy K (2006) Assessment of web services specifications to support long-running conversations. Workshop on information technologies and systems (WITS). doi: http://ssrn. com/abstract=1025493.
27. Umapathy K (2009) An investigation of W3C standardization processes using rational discourse. AIS special interest group on pragmatist IS research (SIGPrag) meeting. doi: http://sprouts. aisnet. org/9-70/.
28. Virili F (2003) Design, sense-making and negotiation activities in the "web services" standardization process. MIS quarterly special issue workshop on standard making: a critical research frontier for information systems.
29. W3C-Process (2005, 14 October) World wide web consortium process document. http://www. w3. org/2005/10/Process-20051014/. Accessed 26 Jan 2009.
30. W3C-XMLWG (2000) XML protocol working group. http://www. w3. org/2000/xp/Group/. Accessed 16 Jan 2006.
31. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
32. Weiss M, Cargill C (1992) Consortia in the standards development process. J Am Soc Inf Sci (JASIS) 43(8): 559-565.
33. Welser HT, Gleave E, Fisher D, Smith M (2007) Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. J Soc Struct 8(2): 1-21.
34. WS Arch (2005, 11 February 2004) Web services architecture. http://www. w3. org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-arch-20040211/. Accessed 17 Feb 2005.
35. WS-CDL (2005, 9 November) Web services choreography description language (WS-CDL). Candidate recommendation. http://www. w3. org/TR/ws-cdl-10/. Accessed 30 Apr 2008.
36. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
37. Zhao K, Xia M, Shaw MJ (2005) Vertical e-business standards and standards developing organizations: a conceptual framework. Electron Mark 15(4): 289-300. doi: 10. 1080/10196780500302690.