The Symbolic Interactionist Frame

Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 3-28

  Stryker, Sheldon ^a   Vryan, Kevin D ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

American Sociological Review; Role Theory; Social Behavior; Social Life; Social Process

Indexed keywords

EID: 85125895166     PISSN: 13896903     EISSN: 2542839X     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-36921-X_1     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Adler, Patricia A., & Adler, Peter. (1991). Backboards and blackboards: College athletes and role engulfment. New York: Columbia University Press.
2. Becker, Howard S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
3. Blumer, Herbert. (1937). Social psychology. In E. P. Schmidt (Ed.), Man and society (pp. 144-198). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Blumer, Herbert. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Blumer, Herbert. (1980). Mead and Blumer: The convergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review 45, 409-419.
6. Bryson, Gladys. (1945). Man and society: The Scottish inquiry of the eighteenth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Burawoy, Michael. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8. Burke, Peter J. (1991). Attitudes, behavior, and the self, In J. A. Howard & P. L. Callero (Eds.), The self society interface: Cognition, emotion and action (pp. 189-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Burke, Peter J., & Reitzes, Donald C. (1981). The link between identity and role performance. Social Psychology Quarterly 44, 83-92.
10. Camic, Charles. (1986). The matter of habit. American Journal of Sociology 91, 1039-1087.
11. Charmaz, Kathy. (1995). Grounded theory. In R. Harre, J. A. Smith, & L. Van Langenhore (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology. London, UK: Sage.
12. Cooley, Charles Horton. (1894). The theory of transportation. Baltimore, MD: American Economics Association.
13. Cooley, Charles Horton. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner's.
14. Couch, Carl J. (1994). Why I went into the laboratory: And, what we found. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 16, 21-34.
15. Couch, Carl J., Saxton, Stan L., & Katovich, Michael A. (1986). Studies in symbolic interaction: The Iowa school. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16. Denzin, Norman K. (1990). The spaces of postmodernism: Reading Plummet on Blumer. Symbolic Interaction 13, 145-154.
17. Denzin, Norman K. (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Denzin, Norman K. (1996). The epistemological crisis in the human discipUnes: Letting the old do the work of the new. In A. Colby, R. lessor, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 127-151). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Dewey, John. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3, 357-370.
20. Dewey, John. (1930). Human nature and conduct. New York: Modern Library.
21. Ellis, Carolyn, & Bochner, Arthur P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Fine, Gary Alan. (1992). Agency, structure, and comparative contexts: Toward a synthetic interactionism. Symbolic Interaction 15, 87-107.
23. Fine, Gary Alan. (1998). Morel tales: The culture of mushrooming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Glaser, Barney G., & Strauss, Anselm L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
25. Goffman, Erving. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
26. Goffman, Erving. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Gouldner, Alvin W. (1970). The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.
28. Harris, Scott R. (2001). What can interactionism contribute to the study of inequality? The case of marriage and beyond. Symbolic Interaction 24, 455-480.
29. Heise, David R. (1979). Understanding events: Affect and the construction of social action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Heise, David R. (1986). Modeling symbolic interaction. In J. S. Coleman, S. Lindenberg, & S. Nowak (Eds.), Approaches to social theory (pp. 291-309). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31. Huber, Joan. (1973). Symbolic interaction as a pragmatic perspective: The bias of emergent theory. American Sociological Review 38, 274-284.
32. Irwin, John. (1977). Scenes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33. James, WilUam. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
34. Jasso, Guillermina. (2001). Formal theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 37-68). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
35. Joas, Hans. (1993). Pragmatism and social theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36. Katovich, Michael A., & Reese II, William A. (1987). The regular: Full-time identities and memberships in an urban bar. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 16, 308-343.
37. Kuhn, Manford H. (1964). Major trends in symbolic interaction theory in the past twenty-five years. Sociological Quarterly V, 61-84.
38. Kuhn, Manford H., & McPartland, Thomas S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review 19, 68-76.
39. Lemert, Edwin. (1951). Social pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Maines, David R. (2000). Pragmatism. In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology (pp. 2217-2224). New York: Macmillan.
41. Maines, David R. (2001). The faultline of consciousness: A view of interactionism in sociology. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
42. McCall, George J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life. New York: Free Press.
43. McPhail, C, & Rexroat, C. (1979). Mead vs. Blumer: The divergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review 44, 449-467.
44. Mead, George Herbert. (1930). Cooley's contribution to American social thought. American Journal of Sociology 35, 693-706.
45. Mead, George Herbert. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Miller, George A. (Ed.). (1973). Communication, language, and meaning: Psychological perspectives. New York: Basic Books.
47. Mullins, Nicholas C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York: Harper and Row.
48. Musolf, Gil Richard. (1993), Some recent directions in symbolic interactionism. In L. T. Reynolds (Ed.), Interactionism: Exposition and Critique (3d ed., pp. 231-283). Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
49. Park, Robert Ezra. (1955). Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology and modern society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
50. Park, Robert Ezra, & Burgess, Ernest W. (1922). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51. Plummer, Ken. (1990). Staying in the empirical world: Symbolic interactionism and postmodernism: A response to Denzin. Symbolic Interaction 13, 155-160.
52. Reynolds, Larry T. (1993). Interactionism: Exposition and critique (3rd ed.). Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
53. Richardson, Laurel. (1991). Speakers whose voices matter: Toward a feminist postmodernist sociological prax. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (pp. 29-38). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
54. Richardson, Laurel. (1997). Fields of play. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
55. Rosenberg, Morris, & Turner, Ralph H. (Eds.) (1981). Social psychology: Sociological perspectives. New York: Basic Books.
56. Schubert, Hans-Joachim. (1998). Introduction. In Charles Horton Cooley, On self and social organization (pp. 1-31). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57. Seeman, Melvin. (1997). The elusive situation in social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly 60, 4-13.
58. Serpe, Richard, & Stryker, Sheldon. (1987). The construction of self and the reconstruction of social relationships. Advances in Group Processes 4, 41-66.
59. Shalin, Dmitri N. (1986). Pragmatism and social interactionism. American Sociological Review 51, 9-29.
60. Snow, David A. (2001). Extending and broadening Blumer's conceptualization of symbolic interactionism. Symbolic Interaction 24, 361-311.
61. Strauss, Anselm L. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62. Strauss, Anselm L. (1994). From whence to whither: Chicago-style interactionism. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 16, 3-8.
63. Stryker, Sheldon. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family 30, 558-564.
64. Stryker, Sheldon. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/ Cummings.
65. Stryker, Sheldon. (1981). Symbolic interactionism: Themes and variations. In M. Rosenberg and R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 3-19). New York: Basic Books.
66. Stryker, Sheldon. (1988). Substance and style: An appraisal of the sociological legacy of Herbert Blumer Symbolic Interaction 11, 33-42.
67. Stryker, Sheldon. (1994). Identity theory: Its development, research base, and prospects. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 16, 9-20.
68. Stryker, Sheldon. (1997). "In the beginning there is society": Lessons from a sociological social psychology. In C. McGarty & A. Haslam (Eds.), Message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 315-327). London: Blackwell.
69. Stryker, Sheldon. (2000). Symbolic interaction theory. In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 3095-3102). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
70. Stryker, Sheldon. (2001a). Social psychology. In P. B. Baltes & N. J. Smelser (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 14,409-14,413) Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
71. Stryker, Sheldon. (2001b). Traditional symbolic interactionism, role theory, and structural symbolic interactionism: The road to identity theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 211-232). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
72. Stryker, Sheldon, & Burke, Peter J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63, 284-297.
73. Thomas, William I. (1927). The behavior pattern and the situation. Publications of the American Sociological Society 22, 1-14.
74. Thomas, William I., & Thomas, Dorothy S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.
75. Thomas, William I., & Znaniecki, Florian. (1918-1920). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
76. Tucker, Charles W, (1966). Some methodological problems of Kuhn's self theory. Sociological Quarterly 7, 345-359.
77. Turner, Ralph H. (1962). Role-taking: Process versus conformity. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 20-40). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
78. Volkart, Edmund H. (Ed.). (1951). Social behavior and personality: Contributions ofW. I. Thomas to theory and social research. Nevi York: Social Science Research Council.
79. Vryan, Kevin D.,Adler, Patricia A., & Adler, Peter, (forthcoming). Identity. In L. J. Reynolds & N. J. Herman (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.