Detecting connectivity changes in neuronal networks

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 209, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 388-397

  Berry, Tyrus ^a   Hamilton, Franz ^b   Peixoto, Nathalia ^b   Sauer, Timothy ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study   (United States)

Author keywords

Cox method; Izhikevich model; Microelectrode arrays; Proportional hazard model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL STRUCTURE; ELECTRODE; HYPOTHESIS; IN VITRO STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; SIMULATION; SPIKE WAVE; SPINAL CORD;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; MICE; MICROELECTRODES; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NEURONS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINAL CORD;

EID: 84864400841     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.06.021     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aertsen A., Gerstein G.L. Evaluation of neuronal connectivity: sensitivity of cross-correlation. Brain Res 1985, 340(2):341-354.
2. Aertsen A., Gerstein G.L., Habib M.K., Palm G. Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of "effective connectivity" J Neurophysiol 1989, 61(5):900-917.
3. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Method 1995, 57(1):289-290.
4. Borisyuk G., Borisyuk R., Kirillov A., Kovalenko E., Kryukov V. A new statistical method for identifying interconnections between neuronal network elements. Biol Cybern 1985, 52(5):301-306.
5. Brillinger D.R. The identification of point process systems. Ann Probab 1975, 3(6):909-924.
6. Brillinger D.R. Nerve cell spike train data analysis: a progression of technique. J Am Stat Assoc 1992, 87(418):260-271.
7. Chornoboy E.S., Schramm L.P., Karr A.F. Maximum likelihood identification of neural point process systems. Biol Cybern 1988, 59(4-5):265-275.
8. Cox D.R. The statistical analysis of dependencies in point processes. Stoch Point Process 1972, 55-56.
9. Dahlhaus R., Eichler M., Sandkhler J. Identification of synaptic connections in neural ensembles by graphical models. J Neurosci Methods 1997, 77(1):93-97.
10. Eldawlatly S., Jin R., Oweiss K.G. Identifying functional connectivity in large-scale neural ensemble recordings: a multiscale data mining approach. Neural Comput 2008, 21(2):450-477.
11. Fox J. Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related methods 1997, Sage.
12. Garofalo M., Nieus T., Massobrio P., Martinoia S. Evaluation of the performance of information theory-based methods and cross-correlation to estimate the functional connectivity in cortical networks. PLoS One 2009, 4(8):e6482.
13. Granger C.W.J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969, 37(3):424-438.
14. Izhikevich E.M. Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 2003, 14(6):1569-1572.
15. Izhikevich E.M. Polychronization: computation with spikes. Neural Comput 2006, 18(2):245-282.
16. Lyttle D., Fellous J.M. A new similarity measure for spike trains: sensitivity to bursts and periods of inhibition. J Neurosci Methods 2011, 199(2):296-299.
17. Masud M.S., Borisyuk R. Statistical technique for analysing functional connectivity of multiple spike trains. J Neurosci Methods 2011, 196(1):201-219.
18. Napoletani D., Sauer T.D. Reconstructing the topology of sparsely connected dynamical networks. Phys Rev E 2008, 77(2):026103.
19. Okatan M., Wilson M.A., Brown E.N. Analyzing functional connectivity using a network likelihood model of ensemble neural spiking activity. Neural Comput 2005, 17(9):1927-1961.
20. Ostojic S., Brunel N., Hakim V. How connectivity, background activity, and synaptic properties shape the cross-correlation between spike trains. J Neurosci 2009, 29(33):10234-10253.
21. Rosenblum M.G., Pikovsky A.S. Detecting direction of coupling in interacting oscillators. Phys Rev E 2001, 4:045202.
22. Sacerdote L., Tamborrino M., Zucca C. Detecting dependencies between spike trains of pairs of neurons through copulas. Brain Res 2012, 1434(0):243-256.
23. Shaffer J.P. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annu Rev Psychol 1995, 46:561-584.
24. Sommerlade L., Thiel M., Platt B., Plano A., Riedel G., Grebogi C., Timmer J., Schelter B. Inference of Granger causal time-dependent influences in noisy multivariate time series. J Neurosci Methods 2012, 203(1):173-185.
25. Stevenson I.H., Rebesco J.M., Hatsopoulos N.G., Haga Z., Miller L.E., Kording K.P. Bayesian inference of functional connectivity and network structure from spikes. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2009, 17(3):203-213.
26. Stevenson I.H., Rebesco J.M., Miller L.E., Krding K.P. Inferring functional connections between neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2008, 18(6):582-588.