High-accuracy mass spectrometry of fission products with Penning traps

Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Kankainen, A ^a   Aysto J ^a,b   Jokinen, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864397056     PISSN: 09543899     EISSN: 13616471     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/39/9/093101     Document Type: Review

References (114)

1. Lunney D, Pearson J M and Thibault C 2003 Recent trends in the determination of nuclear masses Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 1021-82 (Pubitemid 37244524)
2. Blaum K 2006 High-accuracy mass spectrometry with stored ions Phys. Rep. 425 1-78 (Pubitemid 43135891)
3. Bender M, Bertsch G F and Heenen P-H 2006 Global study of quadrupole correlation effects Phys. Rev. C 73 034322 (Pubitemid 43494221)
4. Satua W, Dobaczewski J and Nazarewicz W 1998 Odd-even staggering of nuclear masses: pairing or shape effect? Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3599-602 (Pubitemid 128629568)
5. Zhang J-Y, Casten R F and Brenner D S 1989 Empirical proton-neutron interaction energies. Linearity and saturation phenomena Phys. Lett. B 227 1-5
6. Van Isacker P, Warner D D and Brenner D S 1995 Test of Wigners spin-isospin symmetry from double binding energy differences Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 4607-10
7. Cakirli R B, Brenner D S, Casten R F and Millman E A 2005 Proton-neutron interactions and the new atomic masses Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 092501 (Pubitemid 40620598)
8. Neidherr D et al 2009 High-precision Penning-trap mass measurements of heavy xenon isotopes for nuclear structure studies Phys. Rev. C 80 044323
9. Peräjärvi K et al 2010 Ultra-high resolution mass separator - application to detection of nuclear weapons tests Appl. Radiat. Isot. 68 450-3
10. Savard G, Becker S, Bollen G, Kluge H J, Moore R B, Otto T, Schweikhard L, Stolzenberg H and Wiess U 1991 A new cooling technique for heavy ions in a Penning trap Phys. Lett. A 158 247-52
11. Kugler E 2000 The ISOLDE facility Hyperfine Interact. 129 23-42 (Pubitemid 32260011)
12. Äystö J 2001 Development and applications of the IGISOL technique Nucl. Phys. A 693 477-94 (Pubitemid 33650903)
13. Mukherjee M et al 2008 ISOLTRAP: An on-line Penning trap for mass spectrometry on short-lived nuclides Eur. Phys. J. A 35 1-29
14. Kolhinen V S et al 2004 JYFLTRAP: a cylindrical Penning trap for isobaric beam purification at IGISOL Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 528 776-87
15. Jokinen A et al 2006 Experimental studies at JYFLTRAP Hyperfine Interact. 173 143-51
16. Eronen T et al 2012 JYFLTRAP: a Penning trap for precision mass spectroscopy and isobaric purification Eur. Phys. J. A 48 46
17. Audi G and Wang M 2011 Preview of AME2013 and NUBASE2013 private communication
18. 238U beam at 345 MeV/nucleon J. Phys. Soc. Japan 79 073201
19. Karvonen P, Moore I D, Sonoda T, Kessler T, Penttilä H, Peräjärvi K, Ronkanen P and Äystö J 2008 A sextupole ion beam guide to improve the efficiency and beam quality at IGISOL Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 266 4794-807
20. Nieminen A, Huikari J, Jokinen A, Äystö J, Campbell P and Cochrane E C A 2001 Beam cooler for low-energy radioactive ions Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 469 244-53 (Pubitemid 32737168)
21. Wang J C et al 2004 The Canadian Penning trap mass spectrometer Nucl. Phys. A 746 651-4 (Pubitemid 39538352)
22. Ringle R, Bollen G, Prinke A, Savory J, Schury P, Schwarz S and Sun T 2009 The LEBIT 9.4 T Penning trap mass spectrometer Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 604 536-47
23. Simon V V et al 2012 Penning-trap mass spectrometry of highly charged, neutron-rich Rb and Sr isotopes in the vicinity of A100 Phys. Rev. C 85 064308
24. Dilling J 2010 Report on recent activities at the TITAN mass spectrometer at ISAC/TRIUMF Hyperfine Interact. 196 219-23
25. Brown L S and Gabrielse G 1986 Geonium theory: physics of a single electron or ion in a Penning trap. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58 233-311
26. Karvonen P et al 2008 Upgrade and yields of the IGISOL facility Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 266 4454-9
27. Penttilä H et al 2010 Determining isotopic distributions of fission products with a Penning trap Eur. Phys. J. A 44 147-68
28. Eronen T, Elomaa V-V, Hager U, Hakala J, Jokinen A, Kankainen A, Rahaman S, Rissanen J, Weber C and Äystö J 2008 Preparing isomerically pure beams of short-lived nuclei at JYFLTRAP Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 266 4527-31
29. Ramsey N F 1990 Experiments with separated oscillatory fields and hydrogen masers Rev. Mod. Phys. 62 541-52
30. Bollen G, Kluge H-J, Otto T, Savard G and Stolzenberg H 1992 Ramsey technique applied in a Penning trap mass spectrometer Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 70 490-3
31. Kretzschmar M 2007 The Ramsey method in high-precision mass spectrometry with Penning traps: theoretical foundations Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 264 122-45
32. Gräff G, Kalinowsky H and Traut J 1980 A direct determination of the proton electron mass ratio Z. Phys. A 297 35-9
33. König M, Bollen G, Kluge H J, Otto T and Szerypo J 1995 Quadrupole excitation of stored ion motion at the true cyclotron frequency Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 142 95-116
34. 134, 135Sn Phys. Rev. C 71 064321 (Pubitemid 41492619)
35. George S, Blaum K, Herfurth F, Herlert A, Kretzschmar M, Nagy S, Schwarz S, Schweikhard L and Yazidjian C 2007 The Ramsey method in high-precision mass spectrometry with Penning traps: experimental results Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 264 110-21
36. m Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 252501
37. Kellerbauer A, Blaum K, Bollen G, Herfurth F, Kluge H-J, Kuckein M, Sauvan E, Scheidenberger C and Schweikhard L 2003 From direct to absolute mass measurements: a study of the accuracy of ISOLTRAP Eur. Phys. J. D 22 53-64
38. Birge R T 1932 The calculation of errors by the method of least squares Phys. Rev. 40 207-227
39. Elomaa V-V, Eronen T, Hakala J, Jokinen A, Kankainen A, Moore I D, Rahaman S, Rissanen J, Weber C and Äystö J 2009 Systematic studies of the accuracy of the penning trap mass spectrometer JYFLTRAP Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 612 97-102
40. Hager U et al 2006 First precision mass measurements of refractory fission fragments Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 042504 (Pubitemid 43270847)
41. Hager U et al 2007 Precision mass measurements of neutron-rich yttrium and niobium isotopes Nucl. Phys. A 793 20-39
42. Hager U et al 2007 Precision mass measurements of neutron-rich Tc, Ru, Rh, and Pd isotopes Phys. Rev. C 75 064302
43. Rahaman S et al 2007 Precise atomic masses of neutron-rich Br and Rb nuclei close to the r-process path Eur. Phys. J. A 32 87-96
44. Rahaman S et al 2007 Masses of neutron-rich Ni and Cu isotopes and the shell closure at Z = 28, N = 40 Eur. Phys. J. A 34 5-9
45. Rinta-Antila S et al 2007 Decay study of neutron-rich zirconium isotopes employing a Penning trap as a spectroscopy tool Eur. Phys. J. A 31 1-7
46. 78Ni Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 052502
47. +) Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 122501
48. Hakala J et al 2011 Precision mass measurements of neutron-rich Y, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, and Pd isotopes Eur. Phys. J. A 47 129
49. 132Sn: anomalous behaviour of odd-even staggering of binding energies Phys. Rev. Lett. arXiv:1203.0958v3 [nucl-ex]
50. 132Sn studied with JYFLTRAP Phys. Rev. C arXiv:1206.6236v1 [nucl-ex]
51. Stolzenberg H, Becker S, Bollen G, Kern F, Kluge H-J, Otto T, Savard G, Schweikhard L, Audi G and Moore R B 1990 Accurate mass determination of short-lived isotopes by a tandem Penning-trap mass spectrometer Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 3104-7
52. Ames F et al 1999 High-accuracy mass determination of unstable cesium and barium isotopes Nucl. Phys. A 651 3-30
53. Raimbault-Hartmann H et al 2002 High-accuracy mass determination of neutron-rich rubidium and strontium isotopes Nucl. Phys. A 706 3-14
54. 70Cu Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 112501
55. 56 57Cr and the question of shell reincarnation at N = 32 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 31 S1765
56. Sikler G et al 2005 Mass measurements on neutron-deficient Sr and neutron-rich Sn isotopes with the ISOLTRAP mass spectrometer Nucl. Phys. A 763 45-58 (Pubitemid 41700486)
57. Delahaye P et al 2006 High-accuracy mass measurements of neutron-rich Kr isotopes Phys. Rev. C 74 034331 (Pubitemid 44484415)
58. Guénaut C et al 2007 High-precision mass measurements of nickel, copper, and gallium isotopes and the purported shell closure at N = 40 Phys. Rev. C 75 044303
59. 208Pb Nucl. Phys. A 803 1-29
60. 80Zn Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 262501
61. 132, 134Sn Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 072501 (Pubitemid 351393543)
62. 96, 97Kr Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 032502
63. Breitenfeldt M et al 2010 Approaching the N = 82 shell closure with mass measurements of Ag and Cd isotopes Phys. Rev. C 81 034313
64. Savard G et al 2006 Studies of neutron-rich isotopes with the CPT mass spectrometer and the CARIBU project Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 251 252-9
65. Van Schelt J et al 2012 Mass measurements near the r-process path using the Canadian Penning Trap mass spectrometer Phys. Rev. C 85 045805
66. Ferrer R et al 2010 Penning trap mass spectrometry of neutron-rich Fe and Co isotopes around N = 40 with the LEBIT mass spectrometer Phys. Rev. C 81 044318
67. JYFLTRAP mass database: http://research.jyu.fi/igisol/JYFLTRAP-masses/
68. ISOLTRAP database: http://isoltrap.web.cern.ch/isoltrap/database/isodb. asp
69. Blaum K et al 2004 Population inversion of nuclear states by a Penning trap mass spectrometer Europhys. Lett. 67 586 (Pubitemid 39097376)
70. Hardy J C, Carraz L C, Jonson B and Hansen P G 1977 The essential decay of pandemonium: a demonstration of errors in complex beta-decay schemes Phys. Lett. B 71 307-10
71. Audi G, Wapstra A H and Thibault C 2003 The 2003 atomic mass evaluation: II. Tables, graphs and references Nucl. Phys. A 729 337-676 (Pubitemid 37495859)
72. Audi G, Bersillon O, Blachot J and Wapstra A H 2003 The evaluation of nuclear and decay properties Nucl. Phys. A 729 3-128 (Pubitemid 37495858)
73. Möller P, Nix J R, Myers W D and Swiatecki W J 1995 Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59 185-381
74. Duflo J and Zuker A P 1995 Microscopic mass formulas Phys. Rev. C 52 R23-7
75. Goriely S, Chamel N and Pearson J M 2010 Further explorations of Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov mass formulas: XII. Stiffness and stability of neutron-star matter Phys. Rev. C 82 035804
76. Stoitsov M V, Dobaczewski J, Nazarewicz W, Pittel S and Dean D J 2003 Systematic study of deformed nuclei at the drip lines and beyond Phys. Rev. C 68 054312
77. Stoitsov M V, Dobaczewski J, Nazarewicz W and Borycki P 2006 Large-scale self-consistent nuclear mass calculations Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 251 243-51
78. Dobaczewski J, Stoitsov M V and Nazarewicz W 2004 Skyrme-HFB deformed nuclear mass table AIP Conf. Proc. 726 51 (arXiv:nucl-th/0404077)
79. Heyde Kris and Wood J L 2011 Shape coexistence in atomic nuclei Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 1467-521
80. Lhersonneau G et al 1994 Evolution of deformation in the neutron-rich Zr region from excited intruder state to the ground state Phys. Rev. C 49 1379-90
81. Charlwood F C et al 2009 Nuclear charge radii of molybdenum fission fragments Phys. Lett. B 674 23-7
82. Takahara S, Onishi N, Shimizu Y R and Tajima N 2011 The role of spin-orbit potential in nuclear prolate-shape dominance Phys. Lett. B 702 429-32
83. Weizsäcker C F v 1935 Zur Theorie der Kernmassen Z. Phys. A 96 431-58
84. Bethe H A and Bacher R F 1936 Nuclear physics A. Stationary states of nuclei Rev. Mod. Phys. 8 82-229
85. Fossion R, De Coster C, García-Ramos J E, Werner T and Heyde K 2002 Nuclear binding energies: global collective structure and local shell-model correlations Nucl. Phys. A 697 703-47 (Pubitemid 39659629)
86. Delaroche J P, Girod M, Libert J, Goutte H, Hilaire S, Péru S, Pillet N and Bertsch G F 2010 Structure of even-even nuclei using a mapped collective Hamiltonian and the D1S Gogny interaction Phys. Rev. C 81 014303
87. Nikšić T, Li Z P, Vretenar D, Próchniak L, Meng J and Ring P 2009 Beyond the relativistic mean-field approximation. III. Collective Hamiltonian in five dimensions Phys. Rev. C 79 034303
88. Vingerhoets P et al 2010 Nuclear spins, magnetic moments, and quadrupole moments of Cu isotopes from N = 28 to N = 46: probes for core polarization effects Phys. Rev. C 82 064311
89. Otsuka T, Suzuki T, Fujimoto R, Grawe H and Akaishi Y 2005 Evolution of nuclear shells due to the tensor force Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 232502 (Pubitemid 41776897)
90. Cheal B et al 2010 Nuclear spins and moments of Ga isotopes reveal sudden structural changes between N = 40 and N = 50 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 252502
91. Otsuka T, Matsuo T and Abe D 2006 Mean field with tensor force and shell structure of exotic nuclei Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 162501 (Pubitemid 44583243)
92. Otsuka T 2008 private communication
93. 208Pb Nucl. Phys. A 399 11-50
94. Goriely S, Chamel N and Pearson J M 2009 Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov nuclear mass formulas: crossing the 0.6 MeV accuracy threshold with microscopically deduced pairing Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 152503
95. 78Ni: a hint from the structure of neutron-rich copper isotopes Phys. Rev. C 81 061303
96. 133Sn Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 1020-3
97. 133Sn Nature 465 454-7
98. Friedman W A and Bertsch G F 2007 Neutron-proton pairing reexamined Phys. Rev. C 76 057301
99. Dobaczewski J, Magierski P, Nazarewicz W, Satua W and Szymaski Z 2001 Odd-even staggering of binding energies as a consequence of pairing and mean-field effects Phys. Rev. C 63 024308 (Pubitemid 33231930)
100. Duguet T, Bonche P, Heenen P-H and Meyer J 2001 Pairing correlations: II. Microscopic analysis of odd-even mass staggering in nuclei Phys. Rev. C 65 014311
101. Bertsch G, Dobaczewski J, Nazarewicz W and Pei J 2009 Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov theory of polarized Fermi systems Phys. Rev. A 79 043602
102. Bertulani C A, Lü H F and Sagawa H 2009 Odd-even mass difference and isospin dependent pairing interaction Phys. Rev. C 80 027303
103. 132Sn Phys. Rev. C 66 054313
104. Chabanat E, Bonche P, Haensel P, Meyer J and Schaeffer R 1998 A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities part II. nuclei far from stabilities Nucl. Phys. A 635 231-56 (Pubitemid 128186273)
105. Schunck N, Dobaczewski J, McDonnell J, Moré J, Nazarewicz W, Sarich J and Stoitsov M V 2010 One-quasiparticle states in the nuclear energy density functional theory Phys. Rev. C 81 024316
106. Dobaczewski J, Flocard H and Treiner J 1984 Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov description of nuclei near the neutron-drip line Nucl. Phys. A 422 103-39
107. Dobaczewski J, Nazarewicz W and Stoitsov M V 2002 Nuclear ground-state properties from mean-field calculations Eur. Phys. J. A 15 21-6 (Pubitemid 36211031)
108. Arnould M and Takahashi K 1999 Nuclear astrophysics Rep. Prog. Phys. 62 395
109. Pfeiffer B, Kratz K-L, Thielemann F-K and Walters W B 2001 Nuclear structure studies for the astrophysical r-process Nucl. Phys. A 693 282-324 (Pubitemid 33650893)
110. Wanajo S, Goriely S, Samyn M and Itoh N 2004 The r-process in supernovae: impact of new microscopic mass formulae Astrophys. J. 606 1057 (Pubitemid 38614748)
111. Schatz H 2006 The importance of nuclear masses in the astrophysical rp-process Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 251 293-9
112. Arnould M, Goriely S and Takahashi K 2007 The r-process of stellar nucleosynthesis: astrophysics and nuclear physics achievements and mysteries Phys. Rep. 450 97-213
113. Seeger P A, Fowler W A and Clayton D D 1965 Nucleosynthesis of heavy elements by neutron capture Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 11 121
114. Bouquelle V, Cerf N, Arnould M, Tachibana T and Goriely S 1996 Single and multi-event canonical r-process: astrophysics and nuclear physics considerations Astron. Astrophys. 305 1005 (available at http://articles.adsabs. harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle-query?1996A%26A...305.1005B&data-type= PDF-HIGH&whole-paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf)