Nuclear spins and moments of Ga isotopes reveal sudden structural changes between N=40 and N=50

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 104, Issue 25, 2010, Pages

  Cheal, B ^a   Mane E ^a   Billowes, J ^a   Bissell, M L ^b   Blaum, K ^c   Brown, B A ^d   Charlwood, F C ^a   Flanagan, K T ^e   Forest, D H ^f   Geppert, C ^g,h   Honma, M ⁱ   Jokinen, A ^j,k   Kowalska, M ^c,l   Krieger, A ^h   Kramer J ^h   Moore, I D ^j,k   Neugart, R ^h   Neyens, G ^b   Nortershauser W ^g,h   Schug, M ^c   Stroke, H H ^m   Vingerhoets, P ^b   Yordanov, D T ^c   Zakova M ^h   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b KU LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR KERNPHYSIK   (Germany)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e 91405 Orsay Campus   (France)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^g GSI HELMHOLTZZENTRUM FÜR SCHWERIONENFORSCHUNG GMBH   (Germany)

^h JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF AIZU   (Japan)

^j UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^k UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^l CERN   (Switzerland)

^m POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLINEAR LASERS; LINEAR PAUL TRAP; MODEL CALCULATIONS; MODEL SPACES; NEAR-DEGENERATE; NUCLEAR SPINS; STRUCTURAL CHANGE; THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT;

GALLIUM; ISOTOPES; LASER SPECTROSCOPY;

SPIN DYNAMICS;

EID: 77953924096     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.252502     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. H.J. Kluge and W. Nörtershäuser, Spectrochim. Acta B Atom. Spectros. SAASBH 0584-8547 58, 1031 (2003). 10.1016/S0584-8547(03)00063-6
2. J. Billowes and P. Campbell, J. Phys. G JPGPED 0954-3899 21, 707 (1995). 10.1088/0954-3899/21/6/003
3. P. Campbell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 082501 (2002). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.082501
4. E. Mané, Eur. Phys. J. A 42, 503 (2009). EPJAFV 1434-6001 10.1140/epja/i2009-10828-0
5. S. Franchoo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3100 (1998). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3100
6. S. Franchoo, Phys. Rev. C 64, 054308 (2001). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.64.054308
7. J. Van Roosbroeck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 112501 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.112501
8. C. Guénaut, Phys. Rev. C 75, 044303 (2007). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.044303
9. D. Verney, Phys. Rev. C 76, 054312 (2007). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.76.054312
10. I. Stefanescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 112502 (2008). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.112502 (Pubitemid 351457203)
11. K.T. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 142501 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.142501
12. N.A. Smirnova, Phys. Rev. C 69, 044306 (2004). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.69.044306 (Pubitemid 38845688)
13. A.F. Lisetskiy, B. Brown, and M. Horoi, Eur. Phys. J. A 25, 95 (2005). EPJAFV 1434-6001 10.1140/epjad/i2005-06-158-1 (Pubitemid 41314809)
14. T. Otsuka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 232502 (2005). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.232502 (Pubitemid 41776897)
15. M. Honma, Phys. Rev. C 80, 064323 (2009). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.064323
16. U. Köster, Eur. Phys. J. A 15, 255 (2002). EPJAFV 1434-6001 10.1140/epja/i2001-10264-2 (Pubitemid 36208678)
17. V. Fedoseyev, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B NIMBEU 0168-583X 204, 353 (2003). 10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01959-6
18. W. Geithner, Hyperfine Interact. HYINDN 0304-3843 129, 271 (2000). 10.1023/A:1012642707147 (Pubitemid 32260027)
19. M.N. Vergnes, Phys. Rev. C 19, 1276 (1979). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.19.1276
20. K. Forssten and M. Brenner, Z. Phys. A ZPAADB 0340-2193 278, 27 (1976). 10.1007/BF01547338
21. N. Yoshinaga, K. Higashiyama, and P.H. Regan, Phys. Rev. C 78, 044320 (2008). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044320
22. I. Stefanescu, Phys. Rev. C 79, 064302 (2009). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064302
23. U. Köster, AIP Conf. Proc. 798, 315 (2005). APCPCS 0094-243X 10.1063/1.2137262 (Pubitemid 44632489)
24. D.E.J. Riedeman, Phys. Rev. C 44, R939 (1991). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.44.R939
25. R.T. Daly and J.H. Holloway, Phys. Rev. 96, 539 (1954). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.96.539
26. J.H.M. Neijzen and A. Dönszelmann, Physica (Amsterdam) 98C, 235 (1980). PHYCE6 0921-4534 10.1016/0378-4363(80)90083-2
27. V.J. Ehlers, Phys. Rev. 176, 25 (1968). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.176.25
28. B.A. Brown (unpublished). The jj44b Hamiltonian was obtained from a fit to about 600 binding energies and excitation energies with a method similar to that used for the JUN45 Hamiltonian. Most of the energy data for the fit came from nuclei with Z = 28 - 30 and N = 48 - 50. With 30 linear combinations of the good J - T two-body matrix elements varied, the rms deviation between experiment and theory for the energies in the fit was about 250 keV.
29. A.R. Farhan and B. Singh, Nuclear Data Sheets 81, 417 (1997). NDTSBA 0090-3752 10.1006/ndsh.1997.0014
30. B. Singh, Nuclear Data Sheets 96, 1 (2002). NDTSBA 0090-3752 10.1006/ndsh.2002.0010
31. C.M. Baglin, Nuclear Data Sheets 109, 2257 (2008). NDTSBA 0090-3752 10.1016/j.nds.2008.09.001
32. N.J. Stone, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 90, 75 (2005). ADNDAT 0092-640X 10.1016/j.adt.2005.04.001 (Pubitemid 41001652)
33. P. Pyykkö, Mol. Phys. 99, 1617 (2001). MOPHAM 0026-8976 10.1080/00268970110069010 (Pubitemid 35236386)