The response of face-selective cortex with single face parts and part combinations

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2454-2459

  Arcurio, Lindsay R ^a   Gold, Jason M ^a   James, Thomas W ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Face recognition; Feature based processing; FMRI; Object recognition; Occipital face area

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM FACE AREA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864386612     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Avidan G., Harel M., Hendler T., Ben-Bashat D., Zohary E., Malach R. Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. Journal of Neurophysiology 2002, 87(6):3102-3116.
2. Betts L.R., Wilson H.R. Heterogeneous structure in face-selective human occipito-temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(10):2276-2288.
3. Blais C., Jack R.E., Scheepers C., Fiset D., Caldara R. Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(8):e3022.
4. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):433-436.
5. Caldara R., Zhou X., Miellet S. Putting culture under the 'spotlight' reveals universal information use for face recognition. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(3):e9708.
6. Farah M.J., Wilson K.D., Drain M., Tanaka J.W. What is "special" about face perception?. Psychological Review 1998, 105(3):482-498.
7. Gold J., Bennett P.J., Sekuler A.B. Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers. Vision Research 1999, 39(21):3537-3560.
8. Gold J.M., Mundy P.J., Tjan B.S. The perception of a face is no more than the sum of its parts. Psychological Science 2012, 23(4):427-434.
9. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. The human visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:649-677.
10. Haig N.D. Exploring recognition with interchanged facial features. Perception 1986, 15:235-247.
11. James T.W., Huh E., Kim S. Temporal and spatial integration of face, object, and scene features in occipito-temporal cortex. Brain and Cognition 2010, 74(2):112-122.
12. Kanwisher N., Yovel G. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B 2006, 361:2109-2128.
13. Lerner Y., Epshtein B., Ullman S., Malach R. Class information predicts activation by object fragments in human object areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20(7):1189-1206.
14. Liu J., Harris A., Kanwisher N. Perception of face parts and face configurations: an FMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 22(1):203-211.
15. Maurer D., Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 5(6):255-260.
16. McKone E., Kanwisher N., Duchaine B.C. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 11(1):8-15.
17. McKone E., Yovel G. Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2009, 16(5):778-797.
18. Nestor A., Vettel J.M., Tarr M.J. Task-specific codes for face recognition: how they shape the neural representation of features for detection and individuation. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(12):e3978.
19. Nichols D.F., Betts L.R., Wilson H.R. Decoding of faces and face components in face-sensitive human visual cortex. Frontiers in Psychology 2010, 1:28.
20. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):437-442.
21. Pitcher D., Charles L., Devlin J.T., Walsh V., Duchaine B. Triple dissociation of faces, bodies, and objects in extrastriate cortex. Current Biology 2009, 19(4):319-324.
22. Pitcher D., Duchaine B., Walsh V., Yovel G., Kanwisher N. The role of lateral occipital face and object areas in the face inversion effect. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(12):3448-3453.
23. Pitcher D., Walsh V., Duchaine B. The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 209(4):481-493.
24. Pitcher D., Walsh V., Yovel G., Duchaine B. TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing. Current Biology 2007, 17(18):1568-1573.
25. Rhodes G., Byatt G., Michie P.T., Puce A. Is the fusiform face area specialized for faces, individuation, or expert individuation?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(2):189-203.
26. Rivest J., Moscovitch M., Black S. A comparative case study of face recognition: the contribution of configural and part-based recognition systems, and their interaction. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(13):2798-2811.
27. Rossion B. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica 2008, 128(2):274-289.
28. Schyns P.G., Bonnar L., Gosselin F. Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science 2002, 13(5):402-409.
29. Sekuler A.B., Gaspar C.M., Gold J.M., Bennett P.J. Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Current Biology 2004, 14(5):391-396.
30. Tong F., Nakayama K., Moscovitch M., Weinrib O., Kanwisher N. Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2000, 17(1-3):257-280.
31. Yarbus A.L. Eye movements and vision 1967, Plenum Press, New York.