Don't solve the issues!: A plea for ambiguity within empirical ethics

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 448-456

  Molewijk, Bert ^a,b   Widdershoven, Guy A M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Center for Medical Ethics   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; EUROPE; HUMAN; NORWAY; ORGANIZATION; THINKING; UNCERTAINTY;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; EUROPE; HUMANS; NORWAY; THINKING; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84864371723     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: 14692147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180112000229     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Weaver GR, Trevino LK. Normative and empirical business ethics: Separation, marriage of convenience, or marriage of necessity? Business Ethics Quarterly 1994;4(2):129-43.
2. Molewijk B, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W, Dupuis HM, Kievit Empirical data and moral theory. A plea for integrated empirical ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. A European Journal 2004;7(1):55-69.
3. Musschenga AW. Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2005 Oct;30(5):467-90. (Pubitemid 41759201)
4. Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K. The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics. Bioethics 2005 Feb;19(1):49-71. See also articles in the thematic issue of Bioethics, May 2009. (Pubitemid 40215018)
5. See, for example, the specific section for empirical ethics articles in the journal Clinical Ethics.
6. Birnbacher D. Ethics and social science: Which kind of co-operation? Ethical Theory Moral Pract 1999;2:319-36.
7. Hoffmaster B. Philosophical ethics and practical ethics-Never the twain shall meet. In: Hoffmaster B, Freedman B, Fraser G, eds. Clinical Ethics: Theory and Practice. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press; 1989:201-30.
8. See note 1, Musschenga 2005.
9. Van der Scheer L, Widdershoven G. Integrated empirical ethics: Loss of normativity? Medicine, Health Care Philosophy. A European Journal 2004;7(1):71-9.
10. Düwell M. Sozialwissenschaften, Gesellschaftstheorie und Ethik. Jahrbuch fü r Wissenschaft und Ethik 2005; 10: 5-22.
11. See, for example, Molewijk B. Risky business: Individualised evidence-based decision support and the ideal of patient autonomy. An integrated empirical ethics study [Ph.D. thesis]. Leiden University, 2006, Leiden, the Netherlands;
12. Molewijk AC, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W, Dupuis HM, Kievit J. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: A plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Analysis 2003 Mar;11(1):69-92; (Pubitemid 37129587)
13. Widdershoven G, Abma T, Molewijk B. Empirical ethics as dialogical practice. Bioethics 2009;23(4):236-48;
14. Widdershoven G, Molewijk B, Abma T. Improving care and ethics: A plea for interactive empirical ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 2009;9(6 & 7):99-101;
15. Lindemann HM, Verkerk M, Walker MU. Naturalized Bioethics: Toward Responsible Knowing and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009;
16. Abma TA, Baur VE, Molewijk B, Widdershoven GA. Inter-ethics: Towards an interactive and interdependent bioethics. Bioethics 2010 Jun;24(5):242-55.
17. "The program's mission is to train researchers to conceptualize, design, and conduct both normative ethical analyses and empirical research on bioethics issues." Available at http://www.case.edu/med/bioethics/phd/ index.htm (new citation 2 Feb 2011).
18. "The course in 2011, open for PhD students and research master students, aims to give an overview of current debates in practical philosophy, with a special emphasis on the role of different normative theories in applied contexts." Available at www.osze.nl (last accessed 2 Feb 2011).
19. For that reasonwe do not refer here to papers, however interesting, that give sociological descriptions of how the field of ethics, and later bioethics, has turned into a more empirically focused discipline.
20. Molewijk B, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W, Dupuis HM, Kievit J. Empirical data and moral theory: A plea for integrated empirical ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. A European Journal 2004; 7(1):55-69.
21. See note 1, Musschenga 2005.
22. This criticism applies, of course, only to those moral theories that state that they have a normative and prescriptive aim for social practices.
23. See, for example, Zussman R. Intensive Care: Medical Ethics and the Medical Profession. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press; 1992.
24. Flanagan O. Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1991, at 32.
25. See note 1, Borry et al. 2005.
26. Latour B. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1989.
27. See note 4, Molewijk et al. 2003.
28. See note 4, Molewijk 2006.
29. Schneider CE. The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Doctors, and Medical Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. See note 4, Abma et al. 2010.
30. Gergen KJ. Organization theory in the postmodern era. In: Reed M, Hughes M, eds. Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis. London: Sage; 1992.
31. We do not mean that it is necessary to write a theoretical justification of empirical ethics and its metaethical fallacies as such. For a description of three distinctive metaethical fallacies with respect to empirical ethics, see Dodd J, Stern-Gillet S. The is/ought gap, the fact/value distinction and the naturalistic fallacy. Dialogue 1995;34:727-45;
32. de Vries R, Gordijn B. Empirical ethics and its alleged meta-ethical fallacies. Bioethics 2009 May;23(4):193-201.
33. See, for example, Brody B. Assessing empirical research in bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1993;14:211-9; (Pubitemid 23308846)
34. Pellegrino ED. The limitation of empirical research in ethics. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 1995;6:161-2; see note 3, Düwell 2005.
35. Goldenberg MJ. Evidence-based ethics? On evidence-based practice and the "empirical turn" from normative bioethics. BioMedCentral: Medical Ethics 2005 Nov 8;6:E11;
36. Stretch D. Evidencebased ethics. What it should be and what it shouldn't. BMC Med. Ethics 2008 Oct:9-16.
37. See note 8, Molewijk et al. 2004, at 57.
38. See note 1, Weaver, Trevino 1994.
39. See note 1, Weaver, Trevino 1994.
40. See note 4 Molewijk 2006;
41. Lindemann NJ. Moral teachings from unexpected quarters: Lessons for bioethics from the social sciences and managed care. Hastings Center Report 2000;30(1):12-7.
42. McMillan J, Hope T. The possibility of empirical psychiatric ethics. In: Widdershoven G, McMillan J, Hope T, van der Scheer L. Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:9-22.
43. See note 1, Musschenga 2005.
44. See also Hurst S. What "empirical turn in bioethics"? Bioethics 2010;24(8):439-44;
45. Frith L. Symbiotic empirical ethics: A practical methodology. Bioethics 2010 Oct 6; available online.
46. For example, see note 8, Molewijk et al. 2004; Molewijk and colleagues have distinguished and described the following goals: description, interpretation, explanation, evaluation, reform, development of moral theory, and development of methodology.
47. Van der Scheer, Thiel, Delden, and Widdershoven (2004) studied 33 completed empirical ethics research projects and found that fewer than half of the original empirical ethics project descriptions explicitly contained information on the relationship between the empirical and the normative. Furthermore, even the projects that explicitly mentioned the problematic relationship between the empirical and the normative often remained unclear about the specific features of that relationship. During the interviews with empirical ethics researchers, the researchers often could not state whether something was a purely empirical or normative distinction. See van der Scheer L, van Thiel G, van Delden J, Widdershoven G. Ethiek en empirie: Theorie en methodologie van empirisch ethisch onderzoek [Ethics and empiricism: Theory and methodology of empirical ethics research]. Report of the Caphri Research School funded by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), Maastricht University; 2004.
48. "Ideally, empirical research in bioethics should meet standards for empirical and normative validity similar to those used in the source disciplines for these methods, and articulate these aspects clearly and appropriately. More modestly, criteria to ensure that none of these standards are completely left aside would improve the quality of empirical bioethics research and partly clear the air of critiques addressing its theoretical justification, when its rigour in the particularly difficult context of interdisciplinarity is what should be at stake." See note 28, Hurst 2010:444.
49. Van Willigenburg T, van den Burg W, eds. Reflective Equilibrium: Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1998;
50. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Press of Harvard University; 1971;
51. van Delden JJM, van Thiel GJM. Reflective equilibrium as a normative-empirical model in bioethics. In: van den Burg W, van Willigenburg T, eds. Reflective Equilibrium. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1998:251-9.
52. Gadamer HG. Wahrheit und Methode. Tü bingen: J.C.B. Mohr; 1960. See note 3, van der Scheer, Widdershoven 2004. See note 4,Widdershoven, Abma, Molewijk 2009 and Widdershoven, Molewijk, Abma 2009.
53. Daniels N. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
54. de Vries M, van Leeuwen E. Reflective equilibrium and empirical data: Third person moral experiences in empirical medical ethics. Bioethics 2010;24(9):490-8.
55. Abma TA, Molewijk B, Widdershoven GAM. Good care in ongoing dialogues: Responsive evaluation and moral deliberation. Health Care Analysis 2009;17(3):217-35.