A new parallel tool for classification of remotely sensed imagery

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 46, Issue , 2012, Pages 208-218

  Bernabé, Sergio ^a   Plaza, Antonio ^a   Reddy Marpu, Prashanth ^b   Atli Benediktsson, Jon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

Google maps engine; Graphics processing units (GPUs); Information extraction; Parallel processing; Satellite image classification

Indexed keywords

GOOGLE MAPS; GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNITS; INFORMATION EXTRACTION; PARALLEL PROCESSING; SATELLITE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION;

C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); COMPUTER GRAPHICS; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; PIXELS; REMOTE SENSING; WEBSITES;

PROGRAM PROCESSORS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE RESOLUTION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PIXEL; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

EID: 84864323267     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ball, G., Hall, D., 1965. ISODATA, A Novel Method of Data Analysis and Classification. Technical Report AD-699616, Stanford University.
2. Beaulieu J.M., Goldberg M. Hierarchy in picture segmentation: a stepwise optimal approach. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1989, 11:150-163.
3. Benediktsson J.A., Pesaresi M., Arnason K. Classification and feature extraction for remote sensing images from urban areas based on morphological transformations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2003, 41:1940-1949.
4. Benediktsson J.A., Palmason J.A., Sveinsson J.R. Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2005, 42:480-491.
5. Bernabé S., Plaza A. A new system to perform unsupervised and supervised classification of satellite images from Google maps. Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Satellite Data Compression, Communications, and Processing 2010, vol. 7810:1-10.
6. Bruzzone L., Chi M., Marconcini M. A novel transductive SVM for the semisupervised classification of remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2006, 44:3363-3373.
7. Camps-Valls G., Bruzzone L. Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2005, 43:1351-1362.
8. Chang C.-I. Hyperspectral Imaging: Techniques for Spectral Detection and Classification 2003, Kluwer, New York.
9. Chanussot J., Benediktsson J.A., Fauvel M. Classification of remote sensing images from urban areas using a fuzzy probabilistic model. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2006, 3:40-44.
10. Chellappa R., Jain A. Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications 1993, Academic, New York.
11. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1977, 39:1-38.
12. Foody G.M. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 2002, 90:185-201.
13. Gamba P., Dell'Acqua F., Ferrari A., Palmason J.A., Benediktsson J.A. Exploiting spectral and spatial information in hyperspectral urban data with high resolution. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2004, 1:322-326.
14. Hartigan J.A., Wong M.A. Algorithm as 136: a k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics) 1979, 28:100-108.
15. Jia X., Richards J.A., Ricken D.E. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction 1999, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
16. King R.L. Putting information into the service of decision making: the role of remote sensing analysis. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data 2003, 25-29.
17. Landgrebe D.A. Signal Theory Methods in Multispectral Remote Sensing 2003, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
18. Plaza A., Valencia D., Plaza J., Martinez P. Commodity cluster-based parallel processing of hyperspectral Imagery. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 2006, 66(3):345-358.
19. Paz A., Plaza A. Clusters versus GPUs for parallel automatic target detection in remotely sensed hyperspectral images. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2010, 2010:1-18.
20. Plaza A., Chang C.-I. High Performance Computing in Remote Sensing 2007, Chapman & Hall, CRC Press, Boca Raton, (450 pp).
21. Plaza A., Chang C.-I. Clusters versus FPGA for parallel processing of hyperspectral imagery. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 2008, 22(4):366-385.
22. Plaza A., Benediktsson J.A., Boardman J., Brazile J., Bruzzone L., Camps-Valls G., Chanussot J., Fauvel M., Gamba P., Gualtieri J.A., Marconcini M., Tilton J.C., Trianni G. Recent advances in techniques for hyperspectral image processing. Remote Sensing of Environment 2009, 113:110-122.
23. Richards J.A. Analysis of remotely sensed data: the formative decades and the future. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2005, 43:422-432.
24. Serra J. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology 1982, Academic, New York.
25. Setoain J., Prieto M., Tenllado C., Tirado F. GPU for parallel on-board hyperspectral image processing. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 2008, 22(4):424-437.
26. Setoain J., Prieto M., Tenllado C., Plaza A., Tirado F. Parallel morphological endmember extraction using commodity graphics hardware. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2007, 43:441-445.
27. Soille P. Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications 2003, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
28. Tarabalka Y., Haavardsholm T.V., Kasen I., Skauli T. Real-time anomaly detection in hyperspectral images using multivariate normal mixture models and GPU processing. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing 2009, 4:1-14.