Circumplex Measures of Interpersonal Constructs

Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology: Theory, Research, Assessment, and Therapeutic Interventions

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 313-324

  Locke, Kenneth D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Agency; Communion; Interpersonal circle; Interpersonal circumplex; Inventories; Measures

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864316099     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118001868.ch19     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Adams,R. S.,&Tracey, T. J.G. (2004). Three versions of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales and their fit to the circumplex model. Assessment, 11, 263-270.
2. Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319-345.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
4. Bartz, J. A.,&Hollander, E. (2006). The neuroscience of affiliation: Forging links between basic and clinical research on neuropeptides and social behavior. Hormones and Behavior, 50, 518-528.
5. Blackburn, R., & Renwick, S. J. (1996). Rating scales formeasuring the interpersonal circle in forensic psychiatric patients. Psychological Assessment, 8, 76-84.
6. Bugental, D. B. (2000).Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain-based approach. Psychological Bulletin, 26, 187-209.
7. Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Clark, T. L., & Taulbee, E. S. (1981). A comprehensive and indexed bibliography of the Interpersonal Check List. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 505-525.
9. Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L.,&Morris,M. L. (2000).The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808.
10. Doyle, M., & Dolan, M. (2006). Evaluating the validity of anger regulation problems, interpersonal style, and disturbed mental state for predicting inpatient violence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24, 783-798.
11. Foa, U. G. (1961). Convergences in the analysis of the structure of interpersonal behavior. Psychological Review, 68, 341-353.
12. Gallo, L. C., Smith, T. W., & Cox, C. (2006). Socioeconomic status, psychosocial processes, and perceived health: An interpersonal perspective. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 109-119.
13. Hafkenscheid, A., & Rouckhout, D. (2009). Circumplex structure of the Impact Message Inventory (IMI-C): An empirical test with the dutch version. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 187-94.
14. Hamann, H., Smith, T. W., Smith, K. R., Ruiz, J. M., Kircher, J. C., & Botkin, J. R. (2008). Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/2 gene mutations. Health Psychology, 27, 100-109.
15. Horowitz, L. M. (2004). Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Horowitz, L. M., Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (2000). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems manual.Odessa, FL: The Psychological Corporation.
17. Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. New York: JohnWiley & Sons.
18. Kiesler, D. J., Goldston, C. S., & Schmidt, J. A. (1991). Manual for the Check List of Interpersonal Transactions-Revised (CLOIT-R) and the Check List of Psychotherapy Transactions-Revised (CLOPT-R). Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University.
19. Kiesler, D. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (2006). Manual for the Impact Message Inventory-Circumplex (IMI-C). Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
20. Kiesler, D. J., Schmidt, J. A., &Wagner, C. C. (1997). A circumplex inventory of impact messages: An operational bridge between emotional and interpersonal behavior. In R. Plutchik, & H. R. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 221-244). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. LaForge, R., & Suczek, R. F. (1955). The interpersonal dimension of personality: An interpersonal check list. Journal of Personality, 24, 94-112.
22. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
23. Locke, K. D. (2000). Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249-267.
24. Locke, K. D. (2003). Status and solidarity in social comparison: Agentic and communal values and vertical and horizontal directions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 619-631.
25. Locke, K. D. (2005). Interpersonal problems and interpersonal expectations in everyday life. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 915-931.
26. Locke, K. D. (2006). Interpersonal circumplex measures. In S. Strack (Ed.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (2nd ed., pp. 383-400). New York: Springer.
27. Locke,K. D.,&Christensen, L. (2007).Re-construing the relational self-construal and its relationship with self-consistency. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 389-402.
28. Locke, K. D. (2009). Communal values and perceived self-other similarity. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Interpersonal Theory and Research, Toronto, Canada.
29. Locke, K. D., & Sadler, P. (2007). Self-efficacy, values, and complementarity in dyadic interactions: Integrating interpersonal and socialcognitive theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 94-109.
30. Markey, P.M.,&Markey, C.N. (2007). The interpersonalmeaning of sexual promiscuity. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1199-1212.
31. Moskowitz, D. S. (2009).Coming full circle: Conceptualizing the study of interpersonal behaviour. Canadian Psychology, 50, 33-41.
32. McCrae,R. R.,&Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins' circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586-595.
33. Ojanen, T., Gronroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005) Applying the interpersonal circumplex model to children's social goals: Connections with peer reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41, 699-710.
34. Ruiz, M., Pincus, A., Borkovec, T., Echemendia, R., Castonguay, L., & Raguesa, S. (2004). Validity of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems for predicting treatment outcome: An investigation with the Pennsylvania Practice Research Network. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 213-222.
35. Salzer, S., Pincus, A. L., Hoyer, J., Kreische, R., Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2008). Interpersonal subtypes within generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 292-299.
36. Schmid Mast,M.,&Hall, J. A. (2004). When is dominance related to smiling? Assigned dominance, dominance preference, trait dominance, and gender as moderators. Sex Roles, 50, 387-399.
37. Schmidt, J. A.,Wagner, C. C., & Kiesler, D. J. (1999). Psychometric and circumplex properties of the octant scale impactmessage inventory (IMI-C): A structural evaluation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 325-334.
38. Sodano, S.M.,&Tracey, T. J. G. (2006). Interpersonal traits in childhood and adolescence: Development of the Child and Adolescent Interpersonal Survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 317-329.
39. Tracey, T. J. G. (2005). Interpersonal rigidity and complementarity. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 592-614.
40. Trobst, K. K. (2000). An interpersonal conceptualization and quantification of social support transactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 971-986.
41. Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 409-420.
42. Wiggins, J. S. (1995). Interpersonal Adjective Scales: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
43. Wiggins, J. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. NewYork: Guilford Press.
44. Wiggins, J. S., & Broughton, R. (1991). A geometric taxonomy of personality scales. European Journal of Personality, 5, 343-365.
45. Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517-530.