Evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction with the same group of patients

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 1018, 2012, Pages

  Qi, L P ^a   Li, Y ^a   Tang, L ^a   Li, Y L ^a   Li, X T ^a   Cui, Y ^a   Sun, Y S ^a   Zhang, Xiao Peng ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY CANCER HOSPITAL AND INSTITUTE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOISE; RADIATION DOSE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; THORACIC NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864306046     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/66327067     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. IMV Medical Information Division. CT market summary report. Des Plaines, IL: IMV Medical Information Division; 2007.
2. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619-28. (Pubitemid 38252854)
3. Linton OW, Mettler FA Jr. National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:321-9. (Pubitemid 36909472)
4. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-84. (Pubitemid 350190758)
5. Nakaura T, Awai K, Oda S, Yanaga Y, Namimoto T, Harada K, et al. A low-kilovolt (peak) high-tube current technique improves venous enhancement and reduces the radiation dose at indirect multidetector-row CT venography: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35:141-7.
6. Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M. CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. Radiology 2006;241:899-907. (Pubitemid 46190558)
7. O'Connor OJ, Vandeleur M, McGarrigle AM, Moore N, McWilliams SR, McSweeney SE, et al. Development of low-dose protocols for thin-section CT assessment of cystic fibrosis in pediatric patients. Radiology 2010;257:820-9.
8. Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K, Deak P, Kalender WA, Uder M, et al. High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest. Invest Radiol 2009;44:728-33.
9. Graser A, Wintersperger BJ, Suess C, Reiser MF, Becker CR. Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:695-701. (Pubitemid 44651492)
10. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Kamath RS, Halpern EF, Saini S. Radiation from "extra" images acquired with abdominal and/or pelvic CT: effect of automatic tube current modulation. Radiology 2004;232:409-14. (Pubitemid 38971280)
11. Yanagawa M, Honda O, Yoshida S, Kikuyama A, Inoue A, Sumikawa H, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for pulmonary CT: image quality of the cadaveric lung on standard- and reduced-dose CT. Acad Radiol 2010;17:1259-66.
12. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:191-9.
13. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, et al. Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:655-60.
14. Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image qualitY in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:1095-9.
15. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:713-9.
16. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, van Persijn van Meerten E, Rodriguez R, et al. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography: appendix C. Contract no. FIGM-C T2000-20078-CT-TIP. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: European Commission; 2004.
17. Kubo T, Lin PJ, Stiller W, Takahashi M, Kauczor HU, Ohno Y, et al. Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:335-43. (Pubitemid 351196603)
18. McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM Jr. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 2006;26:503-12. (Pubitemid 43515321)
19. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, Hsieh J, Pien HH, Digumarthy SR, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 2011;259:565-73.
20. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, Hsieh J, Pien H, Singh S, et al. Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:40-5.
21. Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, Kolokythas O, Koprowicz KM. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2012;22:138-43.