Continuing the dialog: Possibilities for community action research in engineering education

Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 407-411

  Olds, Barbara M ^a   Borrego, Maura ^a   Besterfield Sacre, Mary ^a   Cox, Monica ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; SURVEYS;

COLLABORATIVE WORK; COMMUNITY ACTION; ENGINEERING EDUCATORS; NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING; NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL; NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARDS; SCIENCE , TECHNOLOGY , ENGINEERING , AND MATHEMATICS; STUDENT POPULATIONS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84864299264     PISSN: 10694730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00055.x     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Association of American Universities. (2011). AAU undergraduate STEM education initiative. Retrieved from http://www.aau.edu/policy/article.aspx?id= 12588
2. American Society for Engineering Education. (2009). Retrieved May 14, 2012, from http://www.asee.org/about-us/the-organization/advisory-committees/ CCSSIE/CCSSIEE-Phase1Report-June2009.pdf
3. American Society for Engineering Education. (2012). Innovation with impact. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/InnovationwithImpact
4. The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based Research: An emerging paradigm for education Inquiry. Educational Researcher 32(1), 5-8.
5. Collins, A., Joseph, D., and K. Bielaczyc. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(1), 15-42. (Pubitemid 38202849)
6. Hestenes, D. W. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 141-158.
7. Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., and J. Y. Baek. (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education. London: Routledge.
8. Monks, J. (2009). Who are the part-time faculty? Academe Online (July-August). Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/aaup/pubsres/academe/2009/ja/ feat/monk.htm
9. National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
10. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
11. National Research Council. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
12. National Research Council. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited. Washington, DC: National Academies Press
13. National Science Board. (2007). Moving forward to improve engineering education. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
14. National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
15. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Report to the president: Engage to excel. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/ sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final-feb.pdf
16. President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. (2011). Road Map to Renewal. Retrieved from http://files.jobs-council.com/files/2012/01/JobsCouncil- 2011YearEndReportWeb.pdf
17. Riel, M. (2010). Understanding action research. Retrieved http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/define.html
18. Stainburn, S. (2009, December 30). The case of the vanishing full-time professor. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/ education/edlife/03strategy-t. html