Quantitative spectrometric data-activity relationships (QSDAR) models of endocrine disruptor binding activities

Endocrine Disruption Modeling

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 235-258

  Beger, Richard D ^a   Buzatu, Dan A ^a   Wilkes, Jon G ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR TOXICOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative spectral analysis (CoSA); Comparative structural connectivity spectral analysis (CoSCoSA); Estrogen receptor

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864271926     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420076363     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. R.J. Kavlock, G.P. Daston, C. DeRosa, P. Fenner-Crisp, L.E. Gray, S. Kaattari, G. Lucier, M. Luster, M.J. Mac, C. Maczka, R. Miller, J. Moore, R. Rolland, G. Scott, D.M. Sheehan, T. Sinks, and H.A. Tilson, Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: A report of the U.S. EPAsponsored workshop, Environ. Health Perspect. 104 Suppl. (1996), pp. 715-740.
2. R.M. Blair, H. Fang, W.S. Branham, B.S. Hass, S.L. Dial, C.L. Moland, W. Tong, L. Shi, R. Perkins, and D.M. Sheehan, The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: Structural diversity of ligands, Toxicol. Sci. 54 (2000), pp. 138-153.
3. W.S. Branham, S.L. Dial, C.L. Moland, B.S. Hass, R.M. Blair, H. Fang, L. Shi, W. Tong, R.G. Perkins, and D.M. Sheehan, Phytoestrogens and mycoestrogens bind to the rat uterine estrogen receptor, J. Nutr. 132 (2002), pp. 658-664.
4. H. Fang, W. Tong, W. Branham, C.L. Moland, S.L. Dial, H. Hong, Q. Xie, R. Perkins, W. Owens, and D.M. Sheehan, Study of 202 natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 16 (2003), pp.1338-1358.
5. L.M. Shi, H. Fang, W. Tong, J. Wu, R. Perkins, R. Blair, W. Branham, S.L. Dial, C.L. Moland, and D. Sheehan, QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 41 (2001), pp. 186-195.
6. H. Hong, H. Fang, Q. Xie, R. Perkins, D.M. Sheehan, and W. Tong, Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) model using a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 14 (2003), pp. 373-388.
7. V.P. Palace, K.G. Wauter, R.E. Evans, P.J. Blanchfield, K.H. Mills, S.M. Chalanchuk, D. Godard, M.E. McMaster, and G.R. Tetreault, Biochemical and histopathological effects in pearl dace (Margarisus margarita) chronically exposed to a synthetic estrogen in a whole lake experiment, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 25 (2006), pp. 1114-1125.
8. K.A. Kidd, P.J. Blanchfield, K.H. Mills, V.P. Palace, R.E. Evans, J.M. Lazorchak, and R.W. Flick, Collaspe of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen, PNAS 104 (2007), pp. 8897-8901.
9. J.E. Harries, D. Sheehan, S. Joblin, P. Matthiessen, P. Neall, J.P. Sumpter, T. Taylor, and N. Zaman, Estrogenic activity in five United Kingdom rivers detected by measurement of vitellogenesis in caged male trout, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16 (1997), pp. 534-542.
10. J. Raloff. Hormones: Here’s the beef, Science News 161 (2002), p. 10.
11. R.D. Cramer, J.D. Bunce, and D.E. Patterson, Cross-validation, bootstrapping, and partial least squares compared with multiple regression in conventional QSAR studies, Quant. Struct. Act. Relat. 7 (1988), pp. 18-25.
12. R.D. Cramer, D.E. Paterson, and J.D. Bunce, Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110 (1988), pp. 5959-5967.
13. G. Klopman, Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106 (1984), pp. 7315-7321.
14. G. Klopman, MULTICASE1. A hierarchial computer automated structure evaluation program, Quant. Struct. Act. Rel. 11 (1992), pp. 176-184.
15. C. Hansch and A. Leo, Exploring QSAR — Fundamentals and Applications in chemistry and biology, The American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1995.
16. W. Tong, R. Perkins, L. Xing, W.J. Welsh, and D.M. Sheehan, QSAR models for binding of estrogenic compounds to estrogen receptor α and β subtypes, Endocrinology 138 (1997), pp. 4022-4025.
17. A.R. Katritzky, L. Mu, V.S. Labanov, and M. Karelson, Correlation of boiling points with molecular structure. 1. A training set of 298 diverse organics and a test set of 9 simple inorganics, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996), pp. 10400-10407.
18. T. Fujita, J. Iwasa, and C. Hansch, A new substituent constant, π, derived from partition coefficient, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86 (1964), pp. 5175-5180.
19. S.P. Branbury, Quantitative structure-activity relationship and ecological risk assessment: An overview of predictive aquatic toxicology research, Toxicology 25 (1995), pp. 67-89.
20. A.C. De Dios, J.G. Pearson, and E. Oldfield, Secondary and tertiary structural effects on protein NMR chemical shifts: An ab initio approach, Science 260 (1993), pp. 1491-1496.
21. J.W. Emsley, J. Feeney, and L.H. Sutcliffe, High Resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Volume 1, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965.
22. R.D. Beger, J. Freeman, J. Lay Jr., J. Wilkes, and D.W. Miller, 13C NMR and EI mass spectrometric data-activity relationship (SDAR) model of estrogen receptor binding, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 169 (2000), pp. 17-25.
23. 13C NMR spectra, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22 (2003), pp. 501-509.
24. 13C NMR quantitative spectrometric dataactivity relationship (QSDAR) models of steroid binding to the corticosteroid binding globulin, J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 15 (2001), pp. 659-669.
25. 13C NMR quantitative spectrometric data-activity relationship (QSDAR) models to the aromatase enzyme, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41 (2001), pp. 1360-1366.
26. 13C NMR data, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41 (2001), pp. 1322-1329.
27. 13C NMR spectral data to model a diverse set of estrogens, Int. Elec. J. Mol. Des. 2 (2003), pp. 435-453.
28. R. Bursi, T. Dao, T. van Wilk, M. de Gooyer, E. Kellenbach, and P. Verwer, Comparative spectra analysis (CoSA): Spectra as three-dimensional molecular descriptors for the prediction of biological activities, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39 (1999), pp. 861-867.
29. C.L. Waller, T.I. Opera, K. Chae, H.K. Park, K.S. Korach, S.C. Laws, T.E. Wiese, W.R. Kelce, and L.E. Gray Jr., Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 9 (1996), pp. 1240-1248.
30. G.G.J.M. Kuiper, B. Carlsson, K. Grandien, E. Enmark, J. Haggblad, S. Nilsson, and J.-A. Gustafsson. Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors α and β, Endocrinology 138 (1997), pp. 63-870.
31. Integrated Spectral Data Base System for Organic Compounds. Available at www.aist.go.jp/RIODB/SDBS/.
32. NIST MS database software version 1.6.
33. 1H FT NMR Spectra Edition 1, C.J. Pouchert and J. Behnke, eds., vol. 1-3, Aldrich Chemical Company, Milwaukee, WI, 1993.
34. Spectral Data for Steroids, M. Frenkel and K.N. Marsh, eds., Thermodynamics Research Center, College Station, TX, 1994.
35. A. Bax and S. Grzesiek, Methodological advances in protein NMR, Acc. Chem. Res. 26 (1993), pp. 131-138.
36. W.P. Aue, E. Bartholdi, and R.R. Ernst, Two-dimensional spectroscopy. Application to nuclear magnetic resonance, J. Chem. Phys. 64 (1976), pp. 2229-2246.
37. G. Bodenhausen and D.J. Ruben, Natural abundance nitrogen-15 NMR by enhanced heteronuclear spectroscopy, Chem. Phys. Lett. 69 (1980), pp. 185-189.
38. A. Bax, R.H. Griffey, and B.L. Hawkins, Sensitivity-enhanced correlation of 15N and 1H chemical shifts in natural-abundance samples via multiple quantum coherence, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 (1983), pp. 7188-7190.
39. A. Bax and M.F. Summers, 1H and 13C Assignments from sensitivity-enhanced detection of heteronuclear multiple-bond connectivity by 2D multiple quantum NMR, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108 (1986), pp. 2093-2094.
40. A. Kumar, R.R. Ernst, and K. Wuthrich, A two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser enhancement (2D NOE) experiment for the elucidation of complete proton-proton cross-relaxation networks in biological macromolecules, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comms. 95 (1980), pp. 1-6.
41. R.D. Beger, D. Buzatu, and J.G. Wilkes, Combining NMR spectral and structural data to form models of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls binding to the AhR, J. Comp. Aided Molec. Design 16 (2002), pp. 727-740.
42. R.D. Beger, D. Buzatu, J.G. Wilkes, and J.O. Lay Jr., Developing comparative structural connectivity spectra analysis (CoSCoSA) models of steroid binding to the corticosteroid binding globulin, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2002), pp. 1123-1131.
43. R.D. Beger and J.G. Wilkes, Comparative structural connectivity spectra analysis (CoSCoSA) models of steroids binding to the aromatase enzyme, J. Mol. Recog. 15 (2002), pp. 154-162.
44. W. Bremser, HOSE — A novel substructure code, Anal. Chim. Acta. 103 (1978), pp. 355-365.
45. H. Fang, W. Tong, R. Perkins, A. Soto, N. Prechtl, and S.D. Sheehan, Quantitative comparison of in vitro assays for estrogenic assays, Environ. Health Perspect. 139 (1998), pp. 723-729.
46. R.D. Beger, D.A. Buzatu, and J.G. Wilkes, Combining NMR spectral information with associated structural features to form computationally non-intensive, rugged, and objective models of biological activity, in Drug Discovery Handbook Volume 1. Pharmaceutical Development and Research Handbook, S.C. Gad, ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2005, pp. 227-286.
47. R.L.L. Compadre, R.A. Pearlstein, A.J. Hopfinger, and J.K. Seydel, A quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of some 4-aminophenyl sulfone antibacterial agents using linear free energy and molecular modeling methods, J. Med. Chem. 30 (1987), pp. 900-906.
48. S.D. Pickett and M.J.E. Sternberg, Empirical scale of side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding, J. Mol. Biol. 231 (1993), pp. 825-839.
49. M. Karplus and J.N. Kushick, Method for estimating the configurational entropy of macromolecules, Macromolecules 14 (1981), pp. 325-332.
50. 13C NMR spectra for dioxins, furans, and PCBs using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23 (2004), pp. 24-31.
51. J.G. Wilkes, B.S. Hass, D. Buzatu, L.M. Pence, J.C. Archer, R.D. Beger, L. Schnackenberg, M.K. Halbert, L. Jennings, and R.L. Kodell, QSDAR prediction of TEF values for 1,2,3,4,7-PCDD and 1,3,7,8-TCDD is experimentally verified by CALUX-derived binding values, Toxicol. Sci. 102 (2008), pp. 187-195.