A shortcut to mean-based time tradeoff tariffs for the EQ-5D?

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 569-577

  Rand Hendriksen, Kim ^a,b   Augestad, Liv Ariane ^a   Dahl, Fredrik A ^a   Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø ^b   Stavem, Knut ^a  

^a AKERSHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; health state valuation; QALY; time trade off; TTO

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIOECONOMICS; TIME;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS; VALUE OF LIFE;

EID: 84864259782     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11431607     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 ; 4 (3). 174-84 (Pubitemid 29338769)
2. Drummond MF Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press ; 2007:
3. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997 ; 35 (11). 1095-108 (Pubitemid 127453463)
4. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005 ; 43 (3). 203-20 (Pubitemid 40353904)
5. Lamers LM. The transformation of utilities for health states worse than death: consequences for the estimation of EQ-5D value sets. Med Care. 2007 ; 45 (3). 238-44
6. Shaw JW, Pickard AS, Yu S, et al. A median model for predicting United States population-based EQ-5D health state preferences. Value Health. 2010 ; 13 (2). 278-88
7. Craig BM, Oppe M. From a different angle: a novel approach to health valuation. Soc Sci Med. 2010 ; 70 (2). 169-74
8. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ. 1996 ; 5 (2). 141-54 (Pubitemid 126484860)
9. Robinson A, Dolan P, Williams A. Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: what lies behind the numbers?. Soc Sci Med. 1997 ; 45 (8). 1289-97 (Pubitemid 27387166)
10. Patrick DL, Starks HE, Cain KC, Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA. Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making. 1994 ; 14 (1). 9-18 (Pubitemid 24032677)
11. Dolan P, Roberts J. Modelling valuations for Eq-5d health states: an alternative model using differences in valuations. Med Care. 2002 ; 40 (5). 442-6
12. Tilling C, Devlin N, Tsuchiya A, Buckingham K. Protocols for time tradeoff valuations of health states worse than dead: a literature review. Med Decis Making. 2010 ; 30 (5). 610-9
13. Dolan P, Roberts J. To what extent can we explain time tradeoff values from other information about respondents?. Soc Sci Med. 2002 ; 54 (6). 919-29 (Pubitemid 34155330)
14. Devlin NJ, Tsuchiya A, Buckingham K, Tilling C. A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: feasibility study of the "lead time" approach. Health Econ. 2011 ; 20 (3). 348-61
15. Stalmeier PF, Busschbach JJ, Lamers LM, Krabbe PF. The gap effect: discontinuities of preferences around dead. Health Econ. 2005 ; 14 (7). 679-85 (Pubitemid 40960224)
16. Torrance GW. Health states worse than death. Third International Conference on System Science in Health Care ; 1984 ; 1984. 1085.
17. Norman R, Cronin P, Viney R, et al. International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: a review and analysis. Value Health. 2009 ; 12 (8). 1194-200
18. Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP. Application of multiattribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper Res. 1982 ; 30 (6). 1043-69