A median model for predicting United States population-based EQ-5D health state preferences

Value in Health

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 278-288

  Shaw, James W ^a   Pickard, A Simon ^a   Yu, Shengsheng ^a   Chen, Shijie ^b   Iannacchione, Vincent G ^c   Johnson, Jeffrey A ^d   Coons, Stephen Joel ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b PFIZER INC   (United States)

^c RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^e CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; Health state valuation; Median preferences; United States

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EUROQUOL 5D QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIAN MODEL; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 77149171433     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00675.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5d: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001 33 : 337 343.
2. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990 16 : 199 208.
3. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996 37 : 53 72.
4. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005 43 : 203 220.
5. Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ 2002 11 : 341 353.
6. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997 35 : 1095 1108.
7. Badia X, Roset M, Herdman M, Kind P. A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Med Decis Making 2001 21 : 7 16.
8. Jelsma J, Hansen K, De Weerdt W, et al. How do Zimbabweans value health states? Popul Health Metr 2003 1 : 11.
9. Dobrez D, Cella D, Pickard AS, et al. Estimation of patient preference-based utility weights from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General. Value Health 2007 10 : 266 272.
10. Pickard AS, Shaw JW, Lin HW, et al. A patient-based utility measure of health for clinical trials of cancer therapy based on the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Value Health 2009 12 : 977 988.
11. Patrick DL, Starks HE, Cain KC, et al. Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making 1994 14 : 9 18.
12. Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP. Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper Res 1982 30 : 1043 1069.
13. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behaivor (4th ed). Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1944.
14. Gudex C, ed. Time Trade-Off User Manual: Props and Self-Completion Methods. York, UK : Centre for Health Economics, The University of York, 1994.
15. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, et al. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care 1996 34 : 702 722.
16. Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System. Med Care 2002 40 : 113 128.
17. Stata Corporation. Stata/MP for Windows [Computer Program]. Version 9.2. College Station, TX : Stata Corporation, 2007.
18. Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of Health Surveys. New York : John Wiley and Sons, 1999.
19. Wolter KM. Introduction to Variance Estimation (2nd ed.). New York : Springer, 2007.
20. Rao JNK, Wu CFJ, Yue K. Some recent work on resampling methods for complex surveys. Surv Methodol 1992 18 : 209 217.
21. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York : Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1993.
22. Koenker R, Zhao Q. L-estimation for linear heteroscedastic models. J Nonparametr Stat 1994 3 : 223 235.
23. Giloni A, Sengupta B, Simonoff JS. A mathematical programming approach for improving the robustness of LAD regression. Nav Res Logist 2006 53 : 261 271.
24. Giloni A, Simonoff JS, Sengupta B. Robust weighted LAD regression. Comput Stat Data Anal 2006 50 : 3124 3140.
25. Ellis SP, Morgenthaler S. Leverage and breakdown in L1-regression. J Am Stat Assoc 1992 87 : 143 148.
26. Stevens K, McCabe C, Brazier J, Roberts J. Multi-attribute utility function or statistical inference models: a comparison of health state valuation models using the HUI2 health state classification system. J Health Econ 2007 26 : 992 1002.
27. Lamers LM. The transformation of utilities for health states worse than death: consequences for the estimation of EQ-5D value sets. Med Care 2007 45 : 238 244.
28. Dubois D, Prade H. A review of fuzzy sets aggregation connectives. Info Sci 1985 36 : 85 121.
29. Yager RR. On mean type aggregation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1996 26 : 209 221.
30. Yager RR. Fusion of ordinal information using weighted median aggregation. Int J Approx Reason 1998 18 : 35 52.
31. Black D. On the rationale of group decision-making. J Polit Econ 1948 56 : 23 34.
32. Dowding K. The Median Voter Theorem and Condorcet Problems. Political Analysis and Public Choice. London, England : University of London Press 2006 : 7 14.
33. Arrow KJ. A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J Polit Econ 1950 58 : 328 346.
34. Salomon JA. Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data. Popul Health Metr 2003 1 : 12.
35. Craig BM, Busschbach JJ, Salomon JA. Keep it simple: ranking health states yields values similar to cardinal measurement approaches. J Clin Epidemiol 2009 62 : 296 305.
36. Luce RD. Individual Choice Behavior. New York : John Wiley & Sons, 1959.
37. Saari DG. The profile structure for Luce's choice axiom. J Math Psychol 2005 49 : 226 253.
38. Saari DG. Disposing Dictators, Demystifying Voting Paradoxes. Social Choice Analysis. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2008.