Coming to understand the formal definition of limit: Insights gained from engaging students in reinvention

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 465-493

  Swinyard, Craig ^a   Larsen, Sean ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced mathematical thinking; Calculus; Cognitive development; College mathematics; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864250724     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0465     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bezuidenhout, J. (2001). Limits and continuity: Some conceptions of first-year students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32, 487-500. doi: 10.1080/00207390010022590 (Pubitemid 33307315)
2. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In R. A. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In A. J. Bishop (Managing Ed.) & D. Tall (Vol. Ed.), Mathematics Education Library: Vol. 11. Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153-166). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47203-1-10
4. Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 167-192. doi:10.1016/S0732-3123 (96) 90015-2 (Pubitemid 126175064)
5. Davis, R., & Vinner, S. (1986). The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 281-303.
6. Dorier, J.-L. (1995). Meta level in the teaching of unifying and generalizing concepts in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 175-197. doi:10.1007/BF01274212
7. Dubinsky, E., Elterman, E, & Gong, C. (1988). The student's construction of quantification. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(2), 44-51.
8. Ervynck, G. (1981). Conceptual difficulties for first year university students in the acquisition of limit of a function. In Equipe de Recherche Pedagogique (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 330-333). Grenoble, France: Laboratoire I. M. A. G.
9. Fernandez, E. (2004). The students' take on the epsilon-delta definition of a limit. Primus, 14(1), 43-54. doi:10.1080/10511970408984076
10. Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Graham, K. (1994). Research in calculus learning: Understanding of limits, derivatives, and integrals. In E. Dubinsky & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Research issues in undergraduate mathematics learning: Preliminary analyses and results (pp. 31-45). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
11. Gass, F. (1992). Limits via graphing technology. Primus, 2(1), 9-15. doi: 10.1080/10511979208965644
12. Grabiner, J. (1981). The origins of Cauchy's rigorous calculus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Gravemeijer, K. (1998). Developmental research as a research method. In J. Kilpatrick & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), New ICMI Studies Series: Vol. 4. Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 277-297). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-5196-2-3
14. Gravemeijer, K., Cobb, P., Bowers, J., and Whitenack, J. (2000). Symbolizing, modeling, and instructional design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 225-273). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 111-129. doi:10.1023/A:1003749919816
16. Juter, K. (2006). Limits of functions as they developed through time and as students learn them today. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 407-431. doi: 10.1207/s 15327833mtl0804-3
17. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery (J. Worrall & E. Zahar, Eds.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Monaghan, J. (1991). Problems with the language of limits. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(3), 20-24.
19. Steinmetz, A. (1977). The limit can be understood. MATYC Journal, 11(2), 114-121.
20. Stewart, J. (2001). Calculus: Concepts and contexts (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
21. S winyard, C. (2009). Students 'reasoning about limit in the context of reinventing the formal definition. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
22. Swinyard, C. (2011). Reinventing the formal definition of limit: The case of Amy & Mike. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30, 93-114. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.01.001
23. Tall, D. O. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, limits, infinity, and proof. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 495-511). New York, NY: Macmillan.
24. Tall, D. O., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169. doi:10.1007/BF00305619
25. Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In A. J. Bishop (Managing Ed.) & D. Tall (Vol. Ed.), Mathematics Education Library: Vol. 11. Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 65-81). Boston, MA: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47203-1-5
26. Williams, S. (1991). Models of limit held by college calculus students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 219-236. doi:10.2307/749075