-
1
-
-
80051773251
-
Sensitivity and Workload for manual and automated gyencologic screening: Best current estimates
-
in press
-
Renshaw AA, Elsheikh TM,. Sensitivity and Workload for manual and automated gyencologic screening: Best current estimates. Diagn Cytopatholin, in press.
-
Diagn Cytopatholin
-
-
Renshaw, A.A.1
Elsheikh, T.M.2
-
2
-
-
80054084040
-
HSIL, ECA adjusted workload and the ThinPrep Imaging System
-
in press
-
Renshaw AA, Elsheikh TM,. HSIL, ECA adjusted workload and the ThinPrep Imaging System. Diagn Cytopatholin in press.
-
Diagn Cytopatholin
-
-
Renshaw, A.A.1
Elsheikh, T.M.2
-
4
-
-
0031886661
-
Evaluation of the Thinprep Pap test in clinical practice: A seven month 16,314 case experience in northern Vermont
-
Papillo JL, Zarka MA, St. John TL,. Evaluation of the Thinprep Pap test in clinical practice: A seven month 16,314 case experience in northern Vermont. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 203-208.
-
(1998)
Acta Cytol
, vol.42
, pp. 203-208
-
-
Papillo, J.L.1
Zarka, M.A.2
St. John, T.L.3
-
5
-
-
33847219272
-
Introduction of the ThinPrep Imaging systemt (TIS): Experience in a high volume academic practice
-
Chivukula M, Saad RS, Elishaev E, White S, Mauser N, Dabbs DJ,. Introduction of the ThinPrep Imaging systemt (TIS): Experience in a high volume academic practice. Cyto J 2007; 4: 6.
-
(2007)
Cyto J
, vol.4
, pp. 6
-
-
Chivukula, M.1
Saad, R.S.2
Elishaev, E.3
White, S.4
Mauser, N.5
Dabbs, D.J.6
-
6
-
-
13244283148
-
Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System
-
Biscotti CV, Dawson AR, Dziura B,. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 123: 281-287.
-
(2005)
Am J Clin Pathol
, vol.123
, pp. 281-287
-
-
Biscotti, C.V.1
Dawson, A.R.2
Dziura, B.3
-
7
-
-
52249099239
-
Concordance between original screening and final diagnosis using imager vs manual screen of cervical liquid based cytology slides
-
Pacheco MC, Conlye RC, Pennington DW, Bishop JW,. Concordance between original screening and final diagnosis using imager vs manual screen of cervical liquid based cytology slides. Acta Cytol 2008; 52: 575-578.
-
(2008)
Acta Cytol
, vol.52
, pp. 575-578
-
-
Pacheco, M.C.1
Conlye, R.C.2
Pennington, D.W.3
Bishop, J.W.4
-
8
-
-
33744809538
-
Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix
-
Dziura B, Quinn S, Richard K,. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol 2006; 50: 309-311.
-
(2006)
Acta Cytol
, vol.50
, pp. 309-311
-
-
Dziura, B.1
Quinn, S.2
Richard, K.3
-
9
-
-
34047111290
-
Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a high-colume metropolitan laboratory
-
Miller FS, Nagel LE, Kenny-Moynihan MB,. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a high-colume metropolitan laboratory. Diagn Cytopathol 2007; 35: 213-217.
-
(2007)
Diagn Cytopathol
, vol.35
, pp. 213-217
-
-
Miller, F.S.1
Nagel, L.E.2
Kenny-Moynihan, M.B.3
-
10
-
-
77952573741
-
Increasing Cytotech workload above 100 slides/day using the ThinPrep Imaging system leads to significantly worse screening accuracy
-
Elsheikh T, Kirkpatrick JL, Cooper MK, Johnson ML, Hawkins AP, Renshaw AA,. Increasing Cytotech workload above 100 slides/day using the ThinPrep Imaging system leads to significantly worse screening accuracy. Cancer Cytopathol 2010; 118: 75-82.
-
(2010)
Cancer Cytopathol
, vol.118
, pp. 75-82
-
-
Elsheikh, T.1
Kirkpatrick, J.L.2
Cooper, M.K.3
Johnson, M.L.4
Hawkins, A.P.5
Renshaw, A.A.6
-
11
-
-
84864211120
-
Final Rule
-
Clinical Laboraory Improvement Amendments 1988
-
Clinical Laboraory Improvement Amendments 1988. Final Rule. Federal Register 1992; 57: 1257.
-
(1992)
Federal Register
, vol.57
, pp. 1257
-
-
-
12
-
-
77956587343
-
Surrogate indicators of sensitivity in gynecologic cytology: Can they be used to improve the measurement of sensitivity in the laboratory
-
Renshaw AA, Auger M,. Surrogate indicators of sensitivity in gynecologic cytology: Can they be used to improve the measurement of sensitivity in the laboratory. Cyto J 2009; 6: 19.
-
(2009)
Cyto J
, vol.6
, pp. 19
-
-
Renshaw, A.A.1
Auger, M.2
|