Introduction of the Thin Prep Imaging System™ (TIS): Experience in a high volume academic practice

CytoJournal

Volumn 4, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Chivukula, Mamatha ^a   Saad, Reda S ^a   Elishaev, Esther ^a   White, Susan ^a   Mauser, Nancy ^a   Dabbs, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; LABORATORY TEST; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; SCREENING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY;

EID: 33847219272     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17426413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1742-6413-4-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. D Solomon R Nayar, The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology, definitions, criteria and explanatory notes 12
2. ThinPrep imaging system: operation summary and clinical information.
3. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System. CV Biscotti AE Dawson B Dziura L Galup T Darragh A Rahemullah L Willis-Frank, Am J Clin Pathol 2005 123 2 281 7 10.1309/AGB1-MJ9H-5N43-MEGX 15842055
4. Can we change the way we screen? the ThinPrep Imaging System. AE Dawson, Cancer 102 6 340 4 2004 DEC 25; Review. No abstract available 10.1002/cncr.20721 15540250
5. Comparison of manual and automated methods of liquid-based cytology. A morphologic study. VA Alves M Bibbo FC Schmitt F Milanezi A Longatto Filho, Acta Cytol 2004 48 2 187 93 15085750
6. Screening parameters for ThinPrep and conventional gynecologic cytology via automated monitoring. HD Hoerl JE Shalkham K Cheung SD Hurlbert SL Inhorn DF Kurtycz, Acta Cytol 2000 44 4 618 24 10934956
7. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervicalcytology: acomparison. MS Chacho ME Mattie PE Schwartz, Cancer 99 3 135 40 2003 Jun 25 10.1002/cncr.11102 12811853
8. Implementation of Thin prep imaging system: Impact on Cytology laboratory workload, turn around time and quality parameters. D Underwood AE Dawson, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
9. Detection of abnormal cervicovaginal cytology specimens: A comparison between location-guided (ThinPrep imaging system TIS) and manual screening of Thin prep samples (TP). J Weintraub D Wenger SD Berger, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
10. Validation of accuracy of the ThinPrep imaging system to identify abnormalities. N Qureshi P Ringer, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
11. ThinPrep imaging system (TIS) performance in the diagnosis of uncommon malignancies. D Sabo J Shorie AE Dawson, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
12. Impact of the ThinPrep imaging system on detection rates of cervical abnormalities. N Qureshi P Ringer, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
13. Validation of ThinPrep imaging system assisted screening compared to manual screening of Thin prep pap tests. FS Miller L Nagel MK Moynihan, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
14. Comparison of manual and imaging-directed screening of the Thin prep pap test in a large Metropolitan cytology practice. FS Miller L Nagel MK Moynihan, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
15. ThinPrep imaging system in the detection of High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) of the uterine cervix. K Ricahrd B Dziura S Quinn, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
16. Quality control re-screening in an era of computer-assisted imaging: What can we learn? S Porter N Ray D Underwood AE Dawson, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
17. Validation of the ThinPrep imaging system: A multi-center European study. K Lindfield N Chennete C Boersch R Dachez K Denton E McGoogan J Weintraub ARW Williams, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
18. Impact of the ThinPrep imaging system on the detection of cervical abnormalities. DK Iverson, Acta Cytol 2004 48 5 (Abstract only)
19. Validation of ThinPrep imaging system (TIS) for primary screening in routine clinical practice. AM West MH Saboorian K Vettimattan B Solares H Chen C Vela ST Gokalsan R Ashaq, Acta Cytol 2005 105 5 (Abstract only)
20. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. B Dziura S Quinn K Richard, Acta Cytol 2006 50 3 309 11 16780026